D Mercadante1, M Colnaghi1, V Polimeni1, E Ghezzi1, M Fumagalli1, D Consonni2, F Mosca1. 1. NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 2. Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for respiratory support in late preterm infants treated with sustained lung inflation (SLI) at birth. STUDY DESIGN: In this controlled trial, we randomly assigned infants born at 34(+0) to 36(+6) weeks of gestation to receive SLI (25 cmH2O for 15 s) at birth, followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or assistance according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The primary outcome was the need for any type of respiratory support. The secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for respiratory distress and length of stay. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcomes were calculated for the SLI group in reference to the control group. RESULTS:A total of 185 infants were enrolled: 93 in the SLI group and 92 in the control group. No difference was found in the need for any type of respiratory support between the infants treated with SLI and the control group (10.6 vs 8.7%, RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.99). The NICU admission for respiratory distress and the length of stay did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Providing SLI at birth in late preterm infants does not affect their need for respiratory support.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for respiratory support in late preterm infants treated with sustained lung inflation (SLI) at birth. STUDY DESIGN: In this controlled trial, we randomly assigned infants born at 34(+0) to 36(+6) weeks of gestation to receive SLI (25 cmH2O for 15 s) at birth, followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or assistance according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The primary outcome was the need for any type of respiratory support. The secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for respiratory distress and length of stay. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcomes were calculated for the SLI group in reference to the control group. RESULTS: A total of 185 infants were enrolled: 93 in the SLI group and 92 in the control group. No difference was found in the need for any type of respiratory support between the infants treated with SLI and the control group (10.6 vs 8.7%, RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.99). The NICU admission for respiratory distress and the length of stay did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Providing SLI at birth in late preterm infants does not affect their need for respiratory support.
Authors: Jeroen J van Vonderen; Stuart B Hooper; Helmut D Hummler; Enrico Lopriore; Arjan B te Pas Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Noah H Hillman; Matthew W Kemp; Peter B Noble; Suhas G Kallapur; Alan H Jobe Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Arjan B te Pas; Melissa Siew; Megan J Wallace; Marcus J Kitchen; Andreas Fouras; Robert A Lewis; Naoto Yagi; Kentaro Uesugi; Susan Donath; Peter G Davis; Colin J Morley; Stuart B Hooper Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Graeme R Polglase; David G Tingay; Risha Bhatia; Clare A Berry; Robert J Kopotic; Clinton P Kopotic; Yong Song; Edgardo Szyld; Alan H Jobe; Jane J Pillow Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Haresh Kirpalani; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Martin Keszler; Peter G Davis; Elizabeth E Foglia; Arjan Te Pas; Melissa Fernando; Aasma Chaudhary; Russell Localio; Anton H van Kaam; Wes Onland; Louise S Owen; Georg M Schmölzer; Anup Katheria; Helmut Hummler; Gianluca Lista; Soraya Abbasi; Daniel Klotz; Burkhard Simma; Vinay Nadkarni; Francis R Poulain; Steven M Donn; Han-Suk Kim; Won Soon Park; Claudia Cadet; Juin Yee Kong; Alexandra Smith; Ursula Guillen; Helen G Liley; Andrew O Hopper; Masanori Tamura Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matteo Bruschettini; Colm Pf O'Donnell; Peter G Davis; Colin J Morley; Lorenzo Moja; Maria Grazia Calevo Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-03-18
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Ian Maconochie; Jasmeet Soar; Theresa M Olasveengen; Robert Greif; Myra H Wyckoff; Eunice M Singletary; Richard Aickin; Katherine M Berg; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; Jonathan Wyllie; David Zideman; Robert W Neumar; Gavin D Perkins; Maaret Castrén; Peter T Morley; William H Montgomery; Vinay M Nadkarni; John E Billi; Raina M Merchant; Allan de Caen; Raffo Escalante-Kanashiro; David Kloeck; Tzong-Luen Wang; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 6.251