| Literature DB >> 26820153 |
Tzu-Hao Li1,2, Chia-Chang Huang2,3, Ying-Ying Yang2,3,4, Kuei-Chuan Lee2,5, Shie-Liang Hsieh2,6, Yun-Cheng Hsieh2,5, Lin Alan2, Han-Chieh Lin2,5, Shou-Dong Lee7, Chang-Youh Tsai1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: By blocking TNFα-related effects, thalidomide not only inhibits hepatic fibrogenesis but improves peripheral vasodilatation and portal hypertension in cirrhotic rats. Nonetheless, the investigation of thalidomide's effects on splanchnic and collateral microcirculation has been limited. Our study explored the roles of intestinal and mesenteric TNFα along with inflammasome-related pathway in relation to cirrhosis and the splanchnic/collateral microcirculation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26820153 PMCID: PMC4731147 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primer of rat gene used for quantitative realtime PCR analysis.
| Gene name | Primers sequences |
|---|---|
| TNFα | For:5′-gctcacaatgtctgtgcttagag-3′; Rev:5′-gcagtagccacagctccag-3′ |
| IL-1β | For:5′-tgtgatgaaagacggcacac-3′; Rev:5′-cttcttctttgggtattgtttgg-3′ |
| NLRP3 | For:5′-cagcgatcaacaggcgagac-3′;Rev:5′-agagatatcccagcaaacctatcca-3′ |
| VEGF | For: 5′-ctacctccaccatgccaagt-3′; Rev:5′-gcagtagctgcgctgataga-3′. |
| CD31 | For:5′-cttcaccatccagaaggaagagac-3′; Rev:5′-cactggtattccatgtctctggtg-3′ |
| Angiopoetin-1 | For: 5′-gggaggttggactgtaat-3′; Rev:5′-ctttatcccattcagttt-3′. |
| iNOS | For: 5′-agcatcacccctgtgttccaccc-3′; Rev:5′-tggggcagtctccattgcca-3′. |
| eNOS | For: 5′-ctgctgcccgagatatcttc-3′; Rev:5′-cag gta ctg cag tcc ctcct-3′ |
| 18S | For:5′-gtaacccgttgaaccccatt-3′; Rev:5′-ccatccaatcggtagtagcg-3 |
Hemodynamics in BDL rats with thalidomide treatment.
| BDL-cirrhotic rats(n = 6) | Sham rats(n = 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle (C-V) | Thalidomide (C-T) | Vehicle (S-V) | Thalidomide (S-T) | |
| Body weight (g) | 385±8 | 390±10 | 410±9.7 | 400±13 |
| Mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg) | 96.8±5.7 | 101.2±4.6 | 118±9 | 109±12 |
| Heart rate ( | 341±16 | 329±17 | 238±19 | 227±28 |
| Superior mesenteric arterial blood flow (SMA flow, mL/min) | 11±1.7 | 8.2±0.9 | 5.4±0.8 | 5.6±1.4 |
| Superior mesenteric arterial resistance (SMA resistance, mmHg/mL/min/100g) | 7.4±2 | 10.8±1.3 | - | - |
| Portal venous pressure (PVP, mmHg) | 16±1.9 | 12.5±2.2 | - | - |
| Portal systemic shunting (PSS, %) | 80±14 | 67.2±5 | - | - |
*P<0.05
#P<0.001
because non-cirrhotic sham rats do not develop PPS and our recent study reported that 1-month thalidomide did not change the PVP, only MAP, SMA flow were evaluated to survey whether thalidomide affected the relatively normal splanchnic circulation. SMA resistance is calculated from the formula of (MAP-PVP)/SMA flow. So, the SMA resistance of sham rats cannot be calculated without PVP data.
Plasma, Hepatic and Mesenteric Levels of Various Pathogenic Factors.
| BDL-cirrhotic rats(n = 6) | BDL-cirrhotic rats(n = 6) | BDL-cirrhotic rats(n = 6) | sham rats(n = 6) | sham rats(n = 6) | sham rats(n = 6) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle(C-V) | Thalidomide(C-T) | Vehicle(C-V) | Thalidomide(C-T) | Vehicle(C-V) | Thalidomide(C-T) | Vehicle(S-V) | Thalidomide(S-T) | Vehicle(S-V) | Thalidomide(S-T) | Vehicle(S-V) | Thalidomide(S-T) | |
| Serum (pg/mL) | Hepatic tissue (pg/g) | Mesenteric tissue (pg/g) | Serum (pg/mL) | Hepatic tissue (pg/g) | Mesenteric tissue (pg/g) | |||||||
| TNFα | 21.3±2.9 | 15.4±1.8 | 385±17 | 264±11 | 306±22 | 241±19 | 10.5±0.9 | 9.4±1.8 | 213± 6.8 | 198.2 ±10.3 | 201.2± 8.8 | 193.5±9.8 |
| IL-1β | 42.1±3.8 | 37.5±7.4 | 523±46 | 318±9 | 497±35 | 327±58 | 23.5±1.7 | 22.1±3.1 | 302.5±18.4 | 289.2 ±2.7 | 195.1±10.6 | 186.1±17.4 |
| Caspase-1 | 168.4±22.3 | 157.3±29.5 | 311±32 | 196±16 | 242±16 | 131±17 | 83.5±7.3 | 79.8±10.6 | 168.6±5.4 | 151.6±12.8 | 105.3±7.5 | 99.3±12.3 |
| VEGF | 16.8±3.1 | 15.4±2.1 | 172±8 | 124±7 | 256±14 | 174±23 | 9.3±0.9 | 8.2±1.1 | 102.3±3.2 | 99.6±8.1 | 123.1±4.2 | 114.1±18.2 |
δ P < 0.05 vs. C-T rats
Fig 1Dose-response curves and area under curves (AUC) of in situ perfusion of cirrhotic microvessels.
Chronic thalidomide treatment improves vasoconstrictive hypo-responsiveness to arginine vasopressin (AVP) (A,B) and attenuates vasodilatory hyper-responsiveness to acetycholine (ACh) (C,D) in superior mesenteric arteries (SMA) and portosystemic collateral vessels (PS collaterals); #: P < 0.05 vs. C-V group.
Fig 2In vivo and in vitro effects of thalidomide treatment on mesenteric and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)-induced angiogenesis.
Representative CD31 immunofluoresence (IF) staining angiogenesis images (A) and bar graphs of vascular length (B) and area (C) in mesenteric window. Representative images and bar graph of HUVECs tube formation (D,E) and migration (F,G) assays after 36hr of treatment; †: P<0.05 vs. S-V; δ: p< 0.05 vs. C-T rats;#: p < 0.01 vs. VEGF+TNFα; *: p < 0.05 vs. buffer group.
Fig 3Effects of thalidomide treatment on various cirrhotic vascular/mesenteric/intestinal inflammatory, angiogenic and vasodilatory markers.
Protein and mRNA expressions in splenorenal shunts (BDL) and left renal vein (sham). (A,B), and mesenteric tissues (C,D); (E).H-E staining for severity of mucosal injury (suzuki score) of small intestine; (F). IHC staining for inflammasome expression (NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1β) of ileum. †p<0.05 vs. S-V rats; δ p< 0.05 vs. C-T rats. Genes were normalized to 18S RNA as an internal control.
Fig 4Acute effects of thalidomide on various cirrhotic vascular/mesenteric/intestinal inflammatory and angiogenic markers in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) system.
Various protein (A-B), mRNA (C) and cytokines (D) levels in supernatant of HUVECs with different treatments. #: p < 0.01 vs. VEGF+TNFα; *: p < 0.05 vs. buffer group.
Fig 5Schematic representative hypothesis of chronic thalidomide treatment effects on cirrhotic rats of our study.
TNFα: tumor necrosis factor-α; IVC: inferior vena cava; SMV: superior mesenteric vein; eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO: nitric oxide.