Literature DB >> 26819354

Comorbidity in severe asthma requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy: cross-sectional data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and the British Thoracic Difficult Asthma Registry.

Joan Sweeney1, Chris C Patterson2, Andrew Menzies-Gow3, Rob M Niven4, Adel H Mansur5, Christine Bucknall6, Rekha Chaudhuri7, David Price8, Chris E Brightling9, Liam G Heaney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of systemic corticosteroid-induced morbidity in severe asthma.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study.
SETTING: The primary care Optimum Patient Care Research Database and the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry. PARTICIPANTS: Optimum Patient Care Research Database (7195 subjects in three age- and gender-matched groups)-severe asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) treatment step 5 with four or more prescriptions/year of oral corticosteroids, n=808), mild/moderate asthma (GINA treatment step 2/3, n=3975) and non-asthma controls (n=2412). 770 subjects with severe asthma from the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry (442 receiving daily oral corticosteroids to maintain disease control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence rates of morbidities associated with systemic steroid exposure were evaluated and reported separately for each group.
RESULTS: 748/808 (93%) subjects with severe asthma had one or more condition linked to systemic corticosteroid exposure (mild/moderate asthma 3109/3975 (78%), non-asthma controls 1548/2412 (64%); p<0.001 for severe asthma versus non-asthma controls). Compared with mild/moderate asthma, morbidity rates for severe asthma were significantly higher for conditions associated with systemic steroid exposure (type II diabetes 10% vs 7%, OR=1.46 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.91), p<0.01; osteoporosis 16% vs 4%, OR=5.23, (95% CI 3.97 to 6.89), p<0.001; dyspeptic disorders (including gastric/duodenal ulceration) 65% vs 34%, OR=3.99, (95% CI 3.37 to 4.72), p<0.001; cataracts 9% vs 5%, OR=1.89, (95% CI 1.39 to 2.56), p<0.001). In the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry similar prevalence rates were found, although, additionally, high rates of osteopenia (35%) and obstructive sleep apnoea (11%) were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral corticosteroid-related adverse events are common in severe asthma. New treatments which reduce exposure to oral corticosteroids may reduce the prevalence of these conditions and this should be considered in cost-effectiveness analyses of these new treatments. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma; Drug reactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26819354     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  65 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of severe asthma: a phenotype-based approach.

Authors:  Thomas L Jones; Daniel M Neville; Anoop J Chauhan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  Targeting patients with asthma for omalizumab therapy: choosing the right patient to get the best value for money.

Authors:  Abir Al Said; Breda Cushen; Richard W Costello
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  2016 Respiratory Effectiveness Group Annual Summit Report-impact & influence of real-world respiratory evidence.

Authors:  Alison Chisholm; Nemr Eid; Bernardino Alcázar-Navarrete; Aji Barot; George Christoff; David B Price
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A genome-wide scan for pleiotropy between bone mineral density and nonbone phenotypes.

Authors:  Maria A Christou; Georgios Ntritsos; Georgios Markozannes; Fotis Koskeridis; Spyros N Nikas; David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel; Evangelos Evangelou; Evangelia E Ntzani
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 5.  Asthma and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Overlap: What Has the Evidence Taught Us?

Authors:  Bharati Prasad; Sharmilee M Nyenhuis; Ikuyo Imayama; Aminaa Siddiqi; Mihaela Teodorescu
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Asthma: From Diagnosis to Endotype to Treatment.

Authors:  Katharine M Lodge; Martin D Knolle; Akhilesh Jha
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  R Brett McQueen; Danielle N Sheehan; Melanie D Whittington; Job F M van Boven; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Immune Modulation in Asthma: Current Concepts and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Marek Lommatzsch
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 9.  Mepolizumab for severe refractory eosinophilic asthma: evidence to date and clinical potential.

Authors:  Francesco Menzella; Mirco Lusuardi; Carla Galeone; Sofia Taddei; Nicola Facciolongo; Luigi Zucchi
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Omalizumab for Severe Allergic Asthma Treatment in Italy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from PROXIMA Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Walter Canonica; Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo; Paola Rogliani; Pierachille Santus; Claudia Pitotti; Sergio Di Matteo; Chiara Martinotti; Giacomo Matteo Bruno
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.