Literature DB >> 26818497

Why Don't We Move Slower? The Value of Time in the Neural Control of Action.

Bastien Berret1, Frédéric Jean2.   

Abstract

To want something now rather than later is a common attitude that reflects the brain's tendency to value the passage of time. Because the time taken to accomplish an action inevitably delays task achievement and reward acquisition, this idea was ported to neural movement control within the "cost of time" theory. This theory provides a normative framework to account for the underpinnings of movement time formation within the brain and the origin of a self-selected pace in human and animal motion. Then, how does the brain exactly value time in the control of action? To tackle this issue, we used an inverse optimal control approach and developed a general methodology allowing to squarely sample infinitesimal values of the time cost from experimental motion data. The cost of time underlying saccades was found to have a concave growth, thereby confirming previous results on hyperbolic reward discounting, yet without making any prior assumption about this hypothetical nature. For self-paced reaching, however, movement time was primarily valued according to a striking sigmoidal shape; its rate of change consistently presented a steep rise before a maximum was reached and a slower decay was observed. Theoretical properties of uniqueness and robustness of the inferred time cost were established for the class of problems under investigation, thus reinforcing the significance of the present findings. These results may offer a unique opportunity to uncover how the brain values the passage of time in healthy and pathological motor control and shed new light on the processes underlying action invigoration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Movement time is a fundamental characteristic of neural motor control, but the principles underlying its formation remain little known. This work addresses that question within the inverse optimal control framework where the challenge is to uncover what optimality criterion underlies a system's behavior. Here we rely on the "cost of time" theory that finds its roots into the brain's tendency to discount the actual value of future reward. It asserts that the time elapsed until action completion entails a cost, thereby making slow moves nonoptimal. By means of a thorough theoretical analysis, the present article shows how to sample the infinitesimal values of the time cost without prior assumption about its hypothetical nature and emphasizes its sigmoidal shape for reaching.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/361056-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action vigor; cost of time; movement time; optimal control; reaching; saccade

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26818497      PMCID: PMC6604817          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1921-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  65 in total

Review 1.  Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information.

Authors:  S B Laughlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Minimum Principles in Motor Control.

Authors:  Sascha E. Engelbrecht
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model.

Authors:  E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; Y Uno; H Gomi; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The role of execution noise in movement variability.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The cost of cortical computation.

Authors:  Peter Lennie
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking.

Authors:  H J RALSTON
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1958

8.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.

Authors:  P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-06

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  A Berardelli; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Comparing smooth arm movements with the two-thirds power law and the related segmented-control hypothesis.

Authors:  Magnus J E Richardson; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  21 in total

1.  Control of movement vigor and decision making during foraging.

Authors:  Tehrim Yoon; Robert B Geary; Alaa A Ahmed; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A feedback information-theoretic transmission scheme (FITTS) for modeling trajectory variability in aimed movements.

Authors:  Julien Gori; Olivier Rioul
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Vigor of reaching movements: reward discounts the cost of effort.

Authors:  Erik M Summerside; Reza Shadmehr; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Thomas R Reppert; Erik M Summerside; Tehrim Yoon; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Human Stiffness Perception and Learning in Interacting With Compliant Environments.

Authors:  Chie Takahashi; Morteza Azad; Vijaykumar Rajasekaran; Jan Babič; Michael Mistry
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Movement vigor as a traitlike attribute of individuality.

Authors:  Thomas R Reppert; Ioannis Rigas; David J Herzfeld; Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Oleg Komogortsev; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reinforcement learning control of a biomechanical model of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Florian Fischer; Miroslav Bachinski; Markus Klar; Arthur Fleig; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Stochastic optimal feedforward-feedback control determines timing and variability of arm movements with or without vision.

Authors:  Bastien Berret; Adrien Conessa; Nicolas Schweighofer; Etienne Burdet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Unifying Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off and Cost-Benefit Trade-Off in Human Reaching Movements.

Authors:  Luka Peternel; Olivier Sigaud; Jan Babič
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Time-order-errors and duration ranges in the Episodic Temporal Generalization task.

Authors:  Ezequiel Mikulan; Manuel Bruzzone; Manuel Serodio; Mariano Sigman; Tristán Bekinschtein; Adolfo M García; Lucas Sedeño; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.