Literature DB >> 2681842

Intraoperative transcranial Doppler: limitations of the method.

A Bass1, W C Krupski, P A Schneider, S M Otis, R B Dilley, E F Bernstein.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the transcranial Doppler is a useful technique for intraoperative neuromonitoring, we prospectively used it to study 83 patients undergoing carotid end-arterectomy. A 2 MHz pulsed-wave, range-gated transcranial Doppler was positioned at the transtemporal window after induction of general anesthesia. Mean middle cerebral artery velocity, intraarterial blood pressure, end-tidal PCO2, heart rate, and a spectral array of electroencephalographic activity were recorded continuously throughout the operation. Internal carotid artery back pressure was measured routinely. On completion of the endarterectomy, duplex ultrasound examinations and arteriograms were uniformly obtained to assess technical adequacy. Forty-nine of the 83 patients (60%) had complete preoperative and intraoperative transcranial Doppler examinations. Eleven (13%) had incomplete assessments because of small or absent transtemporal windows. Twenty-three (27%) had unsuccessful monitoring because of technical difficulties, primarily because of inability to maintain probe position--with loss of mean middle cerebral artery velocity recording. In the patients with complete studies, transcranial Doppler failed to provide information that altered surgical therapy. All monitoring modalities were normal in the one patient (1.2%) who sustained an operative stroke. We conclude that at this time, transcranial Doppler has not been useful to routinely monitor the intraoperative events during carotid endarterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2681842     DOI: 10.1067/mva.1989.15567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the effect of end-tidal carbon dioxide on regional cerebral oxygen saturation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Ki; Jin-Ho Rhim; Jae-Hong Park; Young-Jin Han; Yong-Pil Cho; Tae-Won Kwon; Byung-Moon Choi; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Amaraporn Rerkasem; Saritphat Orrapin; Dominic Pj Howard; Sothida Nantakool; Kittipan Rerkasem
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  Cerebral haemodynamics and depression in the elderly.

Authors:  H Tiemeier; S L M Bakker; A Hofman; P J Koudstaal; M M B Breteler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery and carotid artery stump pressure during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  B Romner; D Bergqvist; B Lindblad
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 5.  Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Martijn S Marsman; Jørn Wetterslev; Abdelkarime Kh Jahrome; Christian Gluud; Frans L Moll; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Martijn S Marsman; Jørn Wetterslev; Abdelkarime Khodadade Jahrome; Christian Gluud; Frans L Moll; Amine Karimi; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Eversion technique versus conventional endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in carotid surgery: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Martijn S Marsman; Jorn Wetterslev; Patrick W H E Vriens; Ronald L A W Bleys; Abdelkarime Kh Jahrome; Frans L Moll; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.