Literature DB >> 26817989

Hospitalization for transurethral bladder resection reduces quality of life in Danish patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder tumour.

Karin Mogensen1, Karl B Christensen2, Marie-Louise Vrang1, Gregers G Hermann1.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) on patients' quality of life (QoL) and to validate a tool to quantify problems associated with TURBT in a Danish population. Materials and methods A prospective study was carried out using a combination of questionnaires and interviews. The study included 165 consecutive patients undergoing a TURBT owing to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) from 1 May 2011 to 30 April 2012. Seven patients were selected for interviews. The Danish translation of the QLQ-NMIBC24 Quality of Life Questionnaire for NMIBC, from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), was used. The interviews were semi-structured. The reliability of the subscales quantifying QoL as defined by the EORTC was tested by computing Cronbach's coefficient alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. The interviews were analysed using the phenomenological method. Results The questionnaire was returned by 121 (77%) patients at a mean of 12 days after hospital discharge. Over half had substantial voiding problems and one-third had emotional concerns. These results were confirmed by the interviews. The mean ± SD score for urinary symptoms was 45.21 ± 23.9 and the mean score for the future worries subscale was 39.9 ± 29.9. Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.84 for the urinary symptom subscale and 0.93 for the future worries subscale, which satisfied the reliability criterion for clinical use. Conclusions This first prospective study on QoL following TURBT in patients with NMIBC shows that TURBT has a significant impact on QoL. The Danish version of the EORTC questionnaire QLQ-NMIBC24 has been validated and confirmed in a Danish population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; QoL; TURBT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26817989     DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1132762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the quality of life and sexual functions of patients followed-up for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: preliminary results of the prospective-descriptive study.

Authors:  Deniz Bolat; Serdar Çelik; Mehmet Erhan Aydın; Özgü Aydoğdu; Bülent Günlüsoy; Tansu Değirmenci; Çetin Dinçel
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  Patient-reported outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Manish I Patel; Margaret-Ann Tait; David P Smith; Daniel S J Costa; Shomik Sengupta; Madeleine T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Humanistic and Economic Burden of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of Two Systematic Literature Reviews.

Authors:  Lauren J Lee; Christina S Kwon; Anna Forsythe; Carla M Mamolo; Elizabeth T Masters; Ira A Jacobs
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  Can routine outpatient follow-up of patients with bladder cancer be improved? A multicenter prospective observational assessment of blue light flexible cystoscopy and fulguration.

Authors:  Reza Zare; Magnus Grabe; Gregers G Hermann; Per-Uno Malmström
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-09

5.  Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Authors:  Samantha J Mason; James W F Catto; Amy Downing; Sarah E Bottomley; Adam W Glaser; Penny Wright
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.