| Literature DB >> 26817815 |
Anita Ramesh1, Julie Bristow2, Sari Kovats3, Steven W Lindsay4, Dominic Haslam5, Elena Schmidt6, Clare Gilbert7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the extent to which climate may affect the abundance of Musca sorbens, a putative vector of trachoma. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified by systematically searching online databases including CAB abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Medline, Web of Science and BIOS Online, references from key articles, and the websites of relevant international agencies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26817815 PMCID: PMC4730668 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1330-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Prevalence of Active Trachoma in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific Islands (Trachoma Atlas, Accessed August 2015)
Fig. 2The Life Cycle Of Musca sorbens, the Eye-Seeking Fly Implicated in Trachoma Transmission. (Rothamsted Research Visual Communications Unit, Reproduced with Permission)
Fig. 3Potential Effects of Climatic Factors and Mediators on Fly Abundance, Fitness, and Trachoma Transmission (Factors Found to be Associated with M. Sorbens from Retrieved Papers Marked in Bold)
Fig. 4PRISMA Process of Paper Selection
Effects of Climatic Factors on the Abundance of M. sorbens, High Quality Studies
| Authors, Study Type, and Location | Climate Exposure(s), Measure(s) | Fly Outcomes | Methods | Results (Prevalence/Odds Ratio, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI)) | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors: Toyama & Ikeda, 1981 [ | Tempera-ture: 12 mm below surface of dung pat | Adult: abundance | Method: Flies trapped for 5 min using cone traps baited with fresh cow dung pats; Frequency: Bi-weekly for 11 months then weekly for an additional 14 months. | Adult | Direct effects: Summer (i.e., higher temperature) is significantly associated with greater abundance of all life stages of |
| Type: Field study | Season: Summer (May - October) and winter (November – April); year unstated | Indirect effects: Crusts on dung pats at higher summer temperatures reduce breeding potential of parasites which predate developing | |||
| Location: Dairy farm, Oahu, Hawaii, USA | Egg and larval abundance | Method: Dung pat infestation rates: 20 randomly selected dung pats were examined for eggs and 20 for larvae. Frequency: Weekly between 10:00–20:00 h, for 15 months. | Significantly more dung pats with eggs and larvae found in summer ( | ||
| Larval abundance | Method: Dung pat larval examinations: 4 dung pats more than 3 days old were collected and examined. Frequency Monthly for 13 months. | ||||
| Authors: Taye et al., 2007 [ | t, November 2003 and February | Adult abundance | Method: Human landing catches on young children: counts of fly-eye contacts over 10 min outdoors, a short break, then 10 min indoors between 8:30 and 13:00. Frequency: Bi-weekly for 11 months then weekly for an additional 14 months. | Almost all eye-seeking | Direct effects: Medium altitude is significantly associated with greater abundance of adult |
| Type: Field study | Altitude: <2000 m | ||||
| 2200–2500 m | |||||
| >3000 m | |||||
| Location: 12 villages in Gurage zone, Ethiopia. | Season: May, August, November 2003 and February 2004 | Adult abundance | Method: Modified WHO-exit traps baited with beef 10 traps over 25 h, 1.5 m above ground in playground, plantation, pits, shade, and indoors Frequency: Weekly between the hours of 10:00 and 20:00, for 15 months. |
|
Effects of Climatic Factors on the Abundance of M. sorbens, Moderate Quality Studies (from Hafez and Attia, 1958 [22])
| Authors, Study Type, and Location | Climate Exposure(s), Measure(s) | Fly Outcomes | Methods | Results (Prevalence / Odds Ratio, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI)) | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors: Hafez and Attia, 1958 [ | Temperature | Egg incubation period | Humidity maintained at 100 % RH. Between 53 and 60 eggs were studied at 5.5 °C, 16 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C, 32 °C, 36 °C, 40 °C and 43 °C. | Eggs failed to hatch at 5.5 °C or 43 °C . Eggs took an average of 5.28 h to hatch at 40 °C and 25.3 h at 16 °C. | Within temperature limits that permitted hatching, incubation period was inversely proportional to temperature. Optimal hatching occurred at 28C. No statistical measures. |
| Type: Lab study | |||||
| Location: Taliba, Egypt. | Egg hatching percentage | Eggs were fertile and secured from copulated females. | At 16 °C 95 % of eggs hatched. At 28 °C 100 % of eggs hatched. At 36 °C 90 % of eggs At 40 °C 65 % of eggs hatched. | ||
| Larvae Duration of larval period | Larvae were reared on 15 g milk/bran larval diet, 10 eggs in each 10 cc tube. They were then emptied onto a drier pupation medium. | At 16 °C the mean duration of the larval period was 268.95 ± 0.94 h. At 40C it was 73.05 ± 0.71 h. | Larval period duration was inversely proportional to temperature. Failure to provide drier pupation medium prolonged the larval period duration by several days. No statistical measures. | ||
| Pupae Duration of pupal period | Humidity maintained at 70 % RH. 42–58 pupae were studied at temperatures of 16 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C, 32 °C, 36 °C and 40 °C. | At 16 °C the mean duration of the pupal period was 14.9 ± 0.2 h. At 36 °C it was 3.86 ± 0.02 h. | Pupal period duration was inversely proportional to temperature. | ||
| Adult Percentage adult emergence | Humidity maintained at 70 % RH. 90–115 pupae were studied at temperatures of 16 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C, 32 °C, 36 °C and 40 °C. | 66.6 % of adults emerged at 16 °C. 94.7 % emerged at 24 °C and 28 °C.90 % emerged at 32 °C. None emerged at 40 °C. | Maximum emergence occurred between 24C and 28C. 40C temperatures prevent emergence. No statistical measures. | ||
| Authors: Hafez and Attia, 1958 [ | Relative Humidity | Egg incubation period | Temperature maintained at 31–32 °C. No information given on numbers used. | At 100 % humidity eggs took 6.3–6.6 h to hatch. At 95 % humidity eggs took 6.6–7.1 h to hatch. At 90 % humidity eggs took 7.1–6.6 h to hatch. At 85 % humidity no eggs hatched. | Eggs did not hatch at humidities below 85 %, and took longer to hatch at lower humidities. Fewer eggs hatched at lower humidities. Low humidities damaged eggs through dehydration, causing shrinkage. No statistical measures. |
| Type: Lab study | |||||
| Location: Taliba, Egypt. | Egg hatching percentage | Temperature maintained at 31–32 °C. No information given on numbers used. | At 100 % humidity 100 % of eggs hatched. At 90 % humidity 58 % of eggs hatched. At 85 % humidity no eggs hatched. | ||
| Egg structure | Fertile eggs laid within 15 min of the start of the experiment were placed in a desiccator. | Egg length/width: When RH was increased from 0 to 100 % length increased from 1.369 mm to 1.465 mm (average elongation 7 %) and width increased from 0.298 mm to 0.312 mm (average increase in width of 4.7 %). | |||
| Egg weight (water loss): When exposed to 30 % RH, eggs lost 30 % of their weight in first 60 min (20 % in first 30 min, 10 % in last 30 min). Water loss decreased with increasing exposure to low RH. | |||||
| Pupae Duration of pupal period | Temperatures of 280 and 360 %. | The pupal phase lasted 106–118 h at 28 °C regardless of humidity, and between 90 and 93 h at 36 °C regardless of humidity. | Relative humidity has no significant effect on duration of the pupal phase. | ||
| No information given on numbers used. |
The Effect of Climatic Factors and Seasonality on M. sorbens Abundance. Low Quality Studies
| Reference and Study Location | Fly Outcome | Methods | Results | Climatic or Seasonal Effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author(s): Ponghis (1957) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Traps (type unstated) | Mean monthly catches were highest in June and October, when |
|
| Location: 2 villages, Southern Morocco | Frequency: 1 x / week, June – December (1956) | |||
| Other details: Traps baited with human faeces, fruit, or vegetables. Precautions taken to eliminate effects of secondary factors (e.g., timing of trap deployment). | ||||
| Author(s): Miranpuri and Lahkar (1980) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Fly nets |
|
|
| Frequency: 4 x / month, 2 h twice per day (8–10 am; 13–15 pm); 1974–5 (exact period unstated). | ||||
| Location: Cattle sheds, Assam, India | ||||
| Author(s): Amin et al. (1998) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Cone traps | Relative distribution of fly species by season. Mean monthly catches were highest in April, February and August, and lowest in November, September and July. From databases: April: Av max temp: 28 °C and av ppt 3 mm. June Av max temp: 35 °C and av ppt 0 mm |
|
| Frequency: 1 x / month, December 1994 – November 1995 | ||||
| Location: Al Amargh, Cairo (outskirts), Egypt. | Other details: Traps baited with meat, fish, or liver “near fly breeding sites”. | |||
| Author(s): Khan et al. (1965) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Method not stated |
|
|
| Frequency: 3 x / day, 30 min each (duration not provided) | ||||
| Location: India (National Study) | Other details: Altitude (m) per location: 11 m (Bombay) - >2000 m (Simla). | |||
| Author(s): Rechav (1989) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Hand net |
|
|
| Frequency: 1 x month, collected between 11 am – 12 pm each day over 14 months (years unstated). |
| |||
| Location: Cattle sheds, Transvaal, South Africa | Other details: 10 ml of fresh blood was poured on 12 cows. | |||
| Author(s): Sukhova (1963) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Fly traps |
|
|
| Location: South, Southwest and Northern Turkey. | Frequency: Time / duration not provided; day and night trapping reported. | |||
| Author(s): Tawfik (1969) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Wire mesh cone traps | Daily temperature: |
|
| Location: Cairo (outskirts), Egypt. | Frequency: 2 x / month, hourly catches on two consecutive days | |||
| Other details: Traps baited with rotten fish. | ||||
| Season/temperature/humidity: | ||||
| Author(s): Hafez and Attia (1958) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: method not reported | Mean monthly catches were highest in April, February and August, and lowest in November, September and July. |
|
| Frequency: 1 x / week, entire year (1957) | ||||
| Location: Cairo (outskirts), Egypt. | Other details: Flies ‘attracted to children’s’ eyes’ were collected. | |||
| Author(s): Koe (1975) | Adult abundance | Collection type: Traps (method not reported) |
|
|
| Location: 1 county, Central China | Frequency: 1 x / month, April - November 1963 | |||
| Other details: Fermented bran and sugar bait-trap method. | ||||
| Author(s): Wang at al. (2000) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Cylindrical traps |
|
|
| Frequency: 3 x / month, June to November (1998) and March to November (1999), between 8 am to 4 pm | ||||
| Location: Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, Southern China | Other details: traps baited with fish, fermented bean curd and sugar. | Mean monthly catches were highest in October1998 and August 1999. | ||
| Author(s): Liu at al. (2010) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Traps (method not reported) | Mean monthly catches appear to peak from June to August, with the highest peaks in July. |
|
| Location: Ankang City, Shaanxi Province, Western China | Frequency: Time and duration of catches unknown, January - December 2008. | |||
| Author(s): He at al. (2011) [ | Adult abundance | Collection type: Conical traps |
|
|
| Location: Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, Southern China | Frequency: 1 x / month, September 2005 - August 2010 | |||
| Other details: Traps baited with vinegar and sugar; deployed 9 am–12 pm and 3–4 pm. |
Fig. 5Temperature Optima for Different Life Stages of M. sorbens, High and Moderate Quality Studies. 1. Shortest egg hatching time, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 2. Highest percentage egg hatching, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 3. Shortest larval period, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 4. Shortest duration of pupal period, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 5. Highest percentage of pupal hatching, Hafex & Attia 1958 [21, 22]
Fig. 6Humidity Optima for Different Life Stages of M. sorbens, High and Moderate Quality Studies. 1. Shortest egg hatching time, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 2. Highest percentage egg hatching, Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]. 3. Pupal phase duration was independent of humidity at humidities studied by Hafez & Attia 1958 [21, 22]