| Literature DB >> 26817722 |
Abstract
Plomin, DeFries, Knopik, and Neiderhiser (2016, this issue) are correct in their assertion that many discoveries of behavior genetics have proven to be robust and replicable. I note, in contrast, that more specific assertions about the role of genetics in the development of behavior have failed to replicate. Reflecting on why more general findings replicate better than specific ones sheds light on the difficulties of studying complex human development and on the role played by genes in determining its course.Entities:
Keywords: behavior genetics; genetic influence; phenotypic null hypothesis; replication; significance testing
Year: 2016 PMID: 26817722 DOI: 10.1177/1745691615617442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci ISSN: 1745-6916