IMPORTANCE: Public education campaigns in tobacco control play an important role in changing tobacco-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. The Oklahoma Tobacco Stops with Me campaign has been effective in changing attitudes overall and across subpopulations towards secondhand smoke risks. OBJECTIVE: Investigate campaign impact on secondhand smoke policy and risk attitudes. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional data analyzed with univariate and multivariable models. SETTING: Random-digit dialing surveys conducted in 2007 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Oklahomans 18-65 years old. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: 1) Support for smokefree bars; 2) risk assessment of secondhand smoke (very harmful, causes heart disease, causes sudden infant death); and 3) likelihood of protecting yourself from secondhand smoke. RESULTS: With Tobacco Stops with Me exposure, from 2007 to 2015, Oklahomans demonstrated significant increases in: 1) supporting smokefree bars (23.7% to 55%); 2) reporting beliefs that SHS causes heart disease (58.5% to 72.6%), is very harmful (63.8% to 70.6%) and causes sudden infant death (24% to 34%); and 3) reporting they are very likely to ask someone not to smoke nearby (45% to 52%). Controlling for demographics, smokers and males showed reduced attitude change. In uncontrolled comparisons, high-school graduates faired better than non-diploma individuals, who lacked significant attitude changes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tobacco Stops with Me achieved its mission to more closely align public perception of SHS with well-documented secondhand smoke risks. Efforts to target women were particularly successful. Smokers may be resistant to messaging; closing taglines that reinstate individual choice may help to reduce resistance/reactance (e.g., adding Oklahoma Helpline contact information).
IMPORTANCE: Public education campaigns in tobacco control play an important role in changing tobacco-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. The OklahomaTobacco Stops with Me campaign has been effective in changing attitudes overall and across subpopulations towards secondhand smoke risks. OBJECTIVE: Investigate campaign impact on secondhand smoke policy and risk attitudes. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional data analyzed with univariate and multivariable models. SETTING: Random-digit dialing surveys conducted in 2007 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Oklahomans 18-65 years old. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: 1) Support for smokefree bars; 2) risk assessment of secondhand smoke (very harmful, causes heart disease, causes sudden infant death); and 3) likelihood of protecting yourself from secondhand smoke. RESULTS: With Tobacco Stops with Me exposure, from 2007 to 2015, Oklahomans demonstrated significant increases in: 1) supporting smokefree bars (23.7% to 55%); 2) reporting beliefs that SHS causes heart disease (58.5% to 72.6%), is very harmful (63.8% to 70.6%) and causes sudden infant death (24% to 34%); and 3) reporting they are very likely to ask someone not to smoke nearby (45% to 52%). Controlling for demographics, smokers and males showed reduced attitude change. In uncontrolled comparisons, high-school graduates faired better than non-diploma individuals, who lacked significant attitude changes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tobacco Stops with Me achieved its mission to more closely align public perception of SHS with well-documented secondhand smoke risks. Efforts to target women were particularly successful. Smokers may be resistant to messaging; closing taglines that reinstate individual choice may help to reduce resistance/reactance (e.g., adding Oklahoma Helpline contact information).
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Cheryl G Healton; Kevin C Davis; Peter Messeri; James C Hersey; M Lyndon Haviland Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: James C Hersey; Jeff Niederdeppe; W Douglas Evans; James Nonnemaker; Steven Blahut; Matthew C Farrelly; Debbie Holden; Peter Messeri; M Lyndon Haviland Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.018