Literature DB >> 26816982

Osseous Metastases in Gynaecological Epithelial Malignancies: A Retrospective Institutional Study and Review of Literature.

Saptarshi Ghosh1, Pamidimukkala Bramhananda Rao2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osseous metastasis in gynaecological epithelial tumours is an extremely rare phenomenon occurring in less than 1% of these cancers. AIM: To analyse the clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with gynaecological epithelial cancers with bone metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single institutional retrospective study done with the data available from January 2008 to January 2015. Out of 1686 patients with epithelial gynaecological malignancies there were a total 18 (1.07%) patients with osseous metastasis. Clinico-pathologic characteristics were tabulated in Microsoft Excel 2013 and data were analysed using SPSS software Version 21. A p-value< 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Survival analysis was done by using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to find out the difference in survivals.
RESULTS: Out of the 18 gynaecological epithelial cancer patients with bone metastases, 12 had cervical cancer, three had ovarian cancer, two had endometrial carcinoma and one patient had vulvar malignancy. Twelve patients had squamous cell histology, while the rest had adenocarcinoma. The mean interval from primary diagnosis of cancer to the detection of bone metastases was 31.9 months (range, 1 - 60 months). Solitary bone lesion was present in seven patients. The most common site of bone metastasis was lumbar vertebra. Extra-osseous metastasis was present in 12 patients. The mean follow-up period was 8.3 months. During the follow-up period 12 out of the 18 patients died. There was significant difference in survival (p = 0.005) between patients with solitary bone metastasis and patients with multiple osseous metastases. Near significant survival difference (p = 0.056) was also noted in patients with extra-osseous metastases when compared to the patients without. Improved survival was also found in patients with controlled local disease (p = 0.003) when compared to patients with local failure.
CONCLUSION: Bone metastasis in gynaecological epithelial malignancies is a rare phenomenon, but with grave prognosis. Multiple sites of bone involvement, recurrence at the primary tumour site and presence of other non-osseous metastases are poor prognostic indicators. Treatment in these patients should be tailored according to the patient's need.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastases; Epithelial tumours; Prognostic indicators

Year:  2015        PMID: 26816982      PMCID: PMC4717735          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15063.6925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  16 in total

1.  Bone metastasis from epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Russell D Petty; Fiona Gilbert; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Orla McNally; David Parkin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Bone metastases from gynaecological epithelial cancers.

Authors:  L Gottwald; A Dukowicz; J Piekarski; B Misiewicz; M Spych; P Misiewicz; S Kazmierczak-Lukaszewicz; M Moszynska-Zielinska; A Cialkowska-Rysz
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Bone metastasis from gynecologic carcinomas: a clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  F W Abdul-Karim; M Kida; W B Wentz; J R Carter; K Sorensen; M Macfee; J Zika; J T Makley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Predictors of recurrence in surgical stage II endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C M Feltmate; L R Duska; Y Chang; C E Flynn; N Nikrui; E Kiggundu; A Goodman; A F Fuller; J F McIntyre
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Bone metastasis in cervical cancer patients over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Duangmani Thanapprapasr; Adisak Nartthanarung; Puchong Likittanasombut; Nathpong Israngura Na Ayudhya; Chuenkamon Charakorn; Umaporn Udomsubpayakul; Thanya Subhadarbandhu; Sarikapan Wilailak
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  [Efficacy of operative treatment for pathological fractures in bone metastases in relation to length and comfort of survival].

Authors:  J Dutka; P Sosin; M Urban
Journal:  Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol       Date:  2000

7.  Carcinoma of uterine cervix with isolated metastasis to fibula and its unusual behavior: report of a case and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Pasricha; Anu Tiwari; Tanu Aggarwal; Punita Lal
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.805

Review 8.  Metastatic bone involvement in vulvar cancer: report of a rare case and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Tolia; N Tsoukalas; K Platoni; M Dilvoi; P Pantelakos; N Kelekis; V Kouloulias
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.196

9.  Distant metastases in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  G Cormio; C Rossi; A Cazzolla; L Resta; G Loverro; P Greco; L Selvaggi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 10.  Cancer treatment-related bone disease.

Authors:  Sue A Brown; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.807

View more
  3 in total

1.  Survival in patients with carcinomas presenting with bone metastasis at diagnosis: a SEER population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Manaf H Younis; Lorena Fuentes-Rivera; Spencer Summers; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.

Authors:  Ekta Dhamija; Akhil Baby; Neerja Bhatla; Vishnu Prasad Pulappadi; Mukesh Kumar; Sunesh Kumar; Lalit Kumar; Dayanand Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

3.  A clinicopathologic study of endometrial cancer metastatic to bone: Identification of microsatellite instability improves treatment strategies.

Authors:  Jennifer McEachron; Carolyn Chatterton; Victoria Hastings; Constantine Gorelick; Katherine Economos; Yi-Chun Lee; Marguax J Kanis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.