Literature DB >> 26816668

All-arthroscopic treatment of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Clemens Gwinner1, Arnd Hoburg1, Sophie Wilde1, Imke Schatka2, Björn Dirk Krapohl3, Tobias M Jung4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture from its tibial insertion is a rare condition. Despite the further technical advent in refixation of avulsion fractures, the reported failure rate of current approaches remains high and the optimal surgical technique has not been elucidated yet. The purpose of the current study is to present an all-inside arthroscopic reconstruction technique for bony tibial avulsion fractures of the PCL and initial clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Patients underwent a thorough clinical and radiological examination of both knees at 3, 6, 12, 18, and if possible also at 24 months. Clinical evaluation included subjective and objective IKDC 2000, Lysholm score, and KOOS score. Radiographic imaging studies included CT scans for assessment of osseous integration and anatomic reduction of the bony avulsion. In addition to that posterior stress radiographs of both knees using the Telos device (Arthrex, Naples, USA) were conducted to measure posterior tibial translation.
RESULTS: A total of four patients (1 female, 3 male; ø 38 (± 18) years), who underwent arthroscopic refixation of a PCL avulsion fracture using the Tight Rope device were enrolled in this study. Mean follow up was 22 [18-24] months. The mean subjective IKDC was 72.6% (± 9.9%). Regarding the objective IKDC three patients accounted for grade A, one patient for grade C. The Lysholm score yielded 82 (± 6.9) points. The KOOS score reached 75% (± 13%; symptoms 76%, pain 81%, function 76%, sports 66%, QoL 64%). All patients showed complete osseous integration and anatomic reduction of the bony avulsion. The mean posterior tibial translation at final follow up was 2.8 [0-7] mm.
CONCLUSIONS: All-arthroscopic treatment of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament provides satisfactory clinical results in a preliminary patient cohort. It is a reproducible technique, which minimizes soft tissue damage and obviates a second surgery for hardware removal. Further clinical studies with larger patient cohorts and a control group are needed to further confirm these preliminary results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tight Rope; posterior cruciate ligament; tibial avulsion fracture

Year:  2016        PMID: 26816668      PMCID: PMC4717297          DOI: 10.3205/iprs000081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW        ISSN: 2193-8091


Introduction

Avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are an infrequent injury in the Western world. Notably, its incidence is much higher in countries like India or China with more frequent two-wheeler related injuries [1]. The PCL serves as a primary restraint against posterior tibial translation and adjusts rotational movement in near extension. Once injured, a malfunctioning posterior cruciate ligament carries the potential for long-term sequelae, including persistent instability, decreased activity level and degenerative changes [2], [3], [4]. According to current literature, an early surgical treatment of displaced bony avulsion of the PCL is regarded necessary in order to restore knee stability and to prevent mal- or non-union [4], [5], [6]. Several surgical techniques of open reduction and internal screw or Kirschner wire fixation with direct visualization via a posterior approach have been regarded as suitable [1]. Due to its deep location and the complexity of the adjacent anatomy, minimally invasive and arthroscopic techniques are gaining interest [7], [8]. This growing popularity has prompted a rapid increase in arthroscopic techniques, albeit a paucity of studies exists regarding their clinical outcome. Despite comparable biomechanical properties of open and arthroscopic techniques, direct clinical advantages and disadvantages have yet not been fully elucidated [9]. The aim of the current study is to determine preliminary clinical and radiological parameters of an all-arthroscopic approach for isolated PCL avulsion fractures using the Tight Rope device (Arthrex, Naples, USA) [10].

Material and methods

Inclusion criteria comprised patients with tibial avulsion fractures type II or III as described by White et al. [11]. Only fractures within the first three weeks after injuries were included. Contrarily, we excluded patients, whose radiographs did not include a true lateral view of the tibia as determined by proper superimposition of the femoral condyles. All patients had to give informed consent to participate. The minimum follow up period was two years. Diagnosis in all cases was established by history, clinical examination and radiographic evaluation. Knee radiographs in standing anteroposterior, standing lateral and a computertomography were performed to further delineate the fracture pattern. Posterior stress radiography (GA II stress device; Telos, Weiterstadt, Germany) was not used in the acute setting to prevent additional dislocation of the bony avulsion.

Surgical technique

The patient is placed in supine position and after a thorough physical examination a tourniquet is applied to the patient’s thigh. Preoperative intravenous antibiotics are administered and the leg is prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. An initial diagnostic arthroscopy is performed, using the routine high anterolateral and anteromedial portals. Additional posteromedial portals are created as needed to obtain visual access to the tibial fracture site of the posterior cruciate ligament. The posterior capsule is partly detached from its tibial footprint, frayed soft tissue is debrided and the extent of the bony avulsion is documented. Subsequent to the diagnostic arthroscopy, a 15 mm long pretibial incision is performed about 10 mm distal to the tibial tuberosity. A tibial PCL guide (Fa. Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is introduced and the avulsion fracture is reduced by direct arthroscopic visualization. A 2.4 mm guidewire is inserted aiming for the midpart of the avulsion. Additional guidewires to provide temporary reduction are applied according to the size of the bony avulsion. After that, the central guidewire is overdrilled with a 4.5 mm cannulated drill. Guidewire placement and drilling direction are both controlled fluoroscopically. Once the dorsal cortex is perforated, a Tight Rope is shuttled transtibially and pulled through the bony avulsion. Terminatory, the Tight Rope is flipped under arthroscopic guidance and traction is applied to the pretibial sutures. With the tibia drawn anteriorly, the Tight Rope is tightened until complete reduction is achieved.

Rehabilitation

Postoperative care consists of immobilization of the operated knee in a straight PTS splint (posterior tibial support; Medi, Bayreuth, Germany) in order to avoid posterior tibial translation for a total of four weeks. The patient is encouraged to start isometric quadriceps contraction immediately after surgery. Partial weight bearing and gradual passive mobilization is performed during this period in prone position. Adjoining, free passive range of motion and full weight bearing is gradually established and active range of motion exercises initiated. At this stage, the straight PTS splint is changed into a controlled hinge PCL orthesis, which again generates an anterior directed force on the proximal aspect of the tibia to avoid posterior tibial translation for another six weeks. Return to sports and heavy labor is performed at six months according to the patient’s functional recovery.

Clinical and radiological assessment

Clinical and radiological evaluation was obtained preoperatively, after three, and six months as well as one and two years after surgery, subsequently. At the time of follow up, the same advanced musculoskeletal physician, who was not part of the initial surgical team, performed a thorough physical examination of both knees. Clinical evaluation was assessed by the subjective and objective IKDC 2000, Lysholm score and the KOOS score. Radiographic imaging studies included CT scans and anteroposterior as well as posterior stress radiographs of both knees (Figure 1 (Fig. 1)). Anatomic healing of the bony avulsions and posterior tibial translation were evaluated by an advanced musculoskeletal radiologist using a PACS workstation (Centricity RIS-I 4.2 Plus, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Posterior tibial translation was measured by the use of the Telos device at 90° of flexion with a posteriorly directed force of 150 N at the level of the tibial tubercle. Posterior tibial displacement was measured according to Jacobsen [12] as well as Staubli and Jakob [13] (Figure 2 (Fig. 2)).
Figure 1

Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs six month after surgery showing anatomically reduction and union of the bony avulsion

Figure 2

Measurement of the posterior tibial translation, using Telos stress device; as described by [12], [13]. Perpendicular to the tangent of the tibial plateau (A), the midpoints between the most posterior contours of the medial and lateral femoral condyles (B) and tibial plateaus (C) are established. The distance between these two points is regarded as the posterior tibial translation and is subsequently assessed in relation to that of the uninjured contralateral knee.

Results

Four patients (1 female, 3 male; 41.5 (± 13.8) years) met our inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. All patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological examination at a mean time of follow up of 22 [18-24] months. At time of follow-up, mean subjective IKDC was 72.6% (± 9.9%). Regarding the objective IKDC, three patients accounted for grade A, one patient for grade C. The Lysholm score yielded 82 (± 6.9) points. The KOOS score reached 75% (± 13%; symptoms 76%, pain 81%, function 76%, sports 66%, QoL 64%), respectively (Figure 3 (Fig. 3)). There were no complications, such as neurovascular injuries, superficial or deep infections. Two patients underwent additional meniscal surgery within the initial arthroscopy.
Figure 3

KOOS score [%] of the patient cohort

Radiological assessment confirmed proper reduction and complete osseous healing of the bony avulsion in all cases. The mean posterior tibial translation was 2.8 (0–7) mm at time of follow up. Three out of the four patients returned to their pre-injury level of knee function and sports. Notably, no revision surgery or implant removal had to be performed.

Discussion

The results of the study indicate that the presented all-arthroscopic technique using a Tight Rope device appears to be a feasible and reproducible alternative for PCL avulsion fractures. Even though bony avulsions only account for a small sub-group of all PCL injuries, accurate reduction seems mandatory to enable physiological joint biomechanics and to prevent further osteoarthritic progression and to minimize failure of concomitant meniscal or ligament repair. According to current literature, two approaches are mainly used for the surgical treatment of displaced tibial avulsion fractures of the PCL; an open and an arthroscopic one. Both appear to have advantages and disadvantages. Previous literature commonly recommended an open approach using the traditional posterior, posterolateral or the posteromedial approach [14]. However, open exposure of the bony avulsion can be difficult as a result of the anatomical insertion site of the PCL deep within the posterior tibial plateau and the close proximity of the popliteal neurovascular bundle. Furthermore, postoperative scar tissue and inevitably weakness of the gastrocnemius muscle may restrict postoperative range of motion [14]. Recently, arthroscopic approaches are gaining interest, as they are able to address concomitant lesions, such as chondral or meniscal tears. In addition, they are less invasive due to decreased exposure of the posterior capsule or muscle and therefore reducing both soft tissue damage and postoperative scar formation. However, arthroscopic approaches are far from being accepted. In 1988 Martinez-Moreno and Blanco-Blanco were the first to describe a percutaneous fixation technique under arthroscopic guidance [15]. Even though their technique has never been reported as a clinical application, they were soon followed by Littlejohn and Geissler, who presented an arthroscopically, percutaneous fixation technique in a clinical setting [16]. Hereinafter arthroscopic techniques using suture anchors or suture fixation were established [5], [7], [17], [18], [19], [20]. More recently, transtibial shuttle techniques were introduced with encouraging results [21], [22]. Both authors concluded that the assessed all-inside suspensory devices present an easy to handle technique, which offers a homogenous distribution of pressure to the avulsion site and can be extended to fragments of any size. On the basis of the growing popularity of the Tight Rope device in AC joint repair [23], [24] the presented technique has been implemented [10]. The findings of the current study complement the work of the aforementioned authors and the presented techniques offers several advantages. Firstly, it obviates hardware removal. Additionally, it appears to be a reproducible technique and reduction of the bony avulsion can be assessed both by fluoroscopy and arthroscopic guidance. Due to the arthroscopic procedure, it allows for inspection and treatment of concomitant injuries, as required in our patient cohort. Furthermore, the fracture can be measured suitably and interposed tissue can be removed from the fracture gap. Even in cases of a comminuted fracture pattern the Tight Rope device appears to be suitable, due to the broad tibial insertion site of the PCL. The present study has several limitations. The small number of patients has to be taken into consideration as it limits the ability to draw firm conclusions. Against this background the presented results should be regarded as preliminary and should mainly proof the feasibility and reproducibility. However, there are also some limitations to the presented technique. One of the disadvantages is that the 4.5 mm drill hole might break smaller or thinner bony avulsions. Thus the size of the avulsion should be measured carefully prior surgery. Especially in patients with significant osteoporosis, further research is required to determine whether or not this method is suitable. Another drawback is, that due to the bony reduction, this technique is not able to address occult intraligamentous injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. Inoue et al. [25] stated that occult midsubstance injuries do not significantly affect postoperative posterior translation of the affected knee. Nevertheless, one patient had a side-to-side difference of 7 mm in posterior tibial translation, even though she had documented anatomical healing of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament, which leaves room for further discussion of occult midsubstance injuries in bony ligament avulsions. Future studies could overcome these shortfalls if aiming at a larger patient cohort and if using a control group, which undergoes fracture reduction via an open approach. Due to the PCL attachment deep within the popliteal fossa, arthroscopic fixation can be both challenging and demanding [26]. Additionally, the adherence of the PCL to the posterior capsule increases the risk to embed the joint capsule or local fat tissue into the fracture gap. Due to the inferior visualization of an open approach, arthroscopic surgery of bony avulsions of the PCL provides superior anatomic reduction and union of the fracture fragments with decreased morbidity. Of note, it is mandatory from our perspective, that the surgeon is experienced in creating posterior arthroscopic portals and approaching the posterior compartment. In conclusion, the presented all-arthroscopic treatment of PCL avulsion fractures is feasible and results in good clinical outcomes with well-documented radiographic healing. It is a reproducible technique, which minimizes soft tissue damage and obviates a second surgery for hardware removal. Further clinical studies, with larger patient cohorts and a long-term follow up are needed to further confirm these preliminary results.

Notes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Institute for Radiology of the Charité – Medical University of Berlin for their continuous support and image allocation.
  26 in total

1.  Arthroscopic suture fixation for bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S J Kim; S J Shin; S K Cho; H K Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: a mechanical comparison.

Authors:  Sandra Umeda Sasaki; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; Marco Martins Amatuzzi; César Augusto Martins Pereira
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for chronic acromioclavicular joint instability.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Adeleke Ifesanya; Stephan Pauly; Norbert P Haas
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; R P Jakob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

5.  Avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. An experimental percutaneous rigid fixation technique under arthroscopic control.

Authors:  J L Martinez-Moreno; E Blanco-Blanco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Effects of microendoscopy-assisted reduction and screw fixation through a single mini-incision on posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Dezhi Tang; Liangqi Kang; Zhenqi Ding; Mo Sha; Jiayuan Hong
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The effect of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral contact pressures in the knee joint under simulated muscle loads.

Authors:  Thomas J Gill; Louis E DeFrate; Conrad Wang; Christopher T Carey; Shay Zayontz; Bertram Zarins; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Single-tunnel suture fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture.

Authors:  Jianchao Gui; Liming Wang; Yiqiu Jiang; Qin Wang; Zhong Yu; Qianglong Gu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  M D Boynton; B R Tietjens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures.

Authors:  Anna Katsman; Eric J Strauss; Kirk A Campbell; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Open Posterior Approach versus Arthroscopic Suture Fixation for Displaced Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jae-Gwang Song; Kyung-Wook Nha; Se-Won Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01

3.  Suspension button constructs restore posterior knee laxity in solid tibial avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Philipp Forkel; Louis Buchmann; Jan J Lang; Rainer Burgkart; Andreas B Imhoff; Julian Mehl; Matthias J Feucht; Patrizia Lutz; Andreas Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.