Literature DB >> 26815839

[Quo vadis, modern intensive care medicine? Outdated considerations regarding risks and side effects].

G Duttge1.   

Abstract

Modern intensive care medicine is faced with large challenges which are not solely caused by medical-technical progress, but above all by the demographic and value-related changes of society and its citizens. Thereby, three central problem areas are of particular interest: the fragile effectiveness of a patient's right to self-determination at the end of life, the uncertainties regarding the demarcation of futility, and the question of the influence of economic considerations (rationing) in view of the different levels for the allocation of duties and execution of duties. This article contains the revised version of the lecture from June 18, 2015 on the occasion of the 47th annual joint conference of DGIIN (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) and ÖGIAIN (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) on the general subject: "quality and humanity".

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance directives; Healthcare rationing; Medical futility; Organisational management; Personal autonomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26815839     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-015-0125-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  8 in total

1.  [The historical development of intensive care in Germany. Contemporary views. 17. Review of intensive care medicine. Progress or frustration?].

Authors:  H Burchardi
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Quality assurance and quality management in intensive care].

Authors:  K Notz; R Dubb; A Kaltwasser; C Hermes; S Pfeffer
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  [Rationalization and rationing at the bedside. A normative and empirical status quo analysis].

Authors:  D Strech
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  [Ethics and monetary values. Influence of economical aspects on decision-making in intensive care].

Authors:  J Boldt; T Schöllhorn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  [Rationing, prioritisation, rationalizing: Significance in everyday intensive care].

Authors:  P Gretenkort
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  [Inadequate ICU-admissions : A 12-month prospective cohort study at a German University Hospital].

Authors:  K Bangert; J Borch; S Ferahli; S A Braune; G de Heer; S Kluge
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 0.840

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Therapy escalation for the potential organ donor : Are all intensive care measures also ethically justifiable?]

Authors:  S-O Kuhn; K Hahnenkamp
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  [Quality of dying processes after commencement of the German Living Will Act : Experiences of a surgical intensive care unit].

Authors:  S Strauss; D Kuppinger; W H Hartl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.