Literature DB >> 26815581

Transfusion practice in dogs and cats: an Internet-based survey.

Tiffany A Jagodich1, Marie K Holowaychuk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare current canine and feline transfusion practices at private referral hospitals (PRH) and veterinary teaching hospitals (VTH), including information regarding blood donor screening; blood product collection, storage, and administration; recipient screening; and monitoring during transfusions.
DESIGN: Internet-based survey.
SUBJECTS: Sixty-five board-certified specialist veterinarians, 3 veterinarians, and 5 veterinary technicians from 53 PRH and 20 VTH.
METHODS: A survey was disseminated via email LIST-SERVs; 1 survey response per hospital was included. MAIN
RESULTS: Survey results revealed that PRH more commonly obtained canine and feline blood products solely from blood banks (P < 0.05) and VTH more commonly used hospital-run donor programs (P < 0.05). Canine cryo-poor plasma was more likely to be stored by VTH compared to PRH (P = 0.018) and VTH were more likely to store canine fresh platelet products for >72 hours (P = 0.046). The use of client-owned canine donors (P = 0.043), administration of precollection 1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin to canine donors (P = 0.041), and storage of blood products in a dedicated refrigerator (P = 0.003) and -20°C or -80°C freezer (P = 0.044) were more common in VTH than PRH. However, the use of a refrigerator freezer (P = 0.001), single bag canine collection systems (P = 0.021), and agglutination cards for feline blood typing (P = 0.032), as well as warming of blood products prior to administration (P = 0.021) were more commonly reported by PRH compared to VTH.
CONCLUSIONS: Although some transfusion practices including the method and length of storage of blood products, use and screening of blood donors, and administration methods varied between VTH and PRH, most transfusion practices were similar. The information reported from this survey could aid the development of future veterinary transfusion consensus statements. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood bank; blood donor; blood product; cross-match; fresh frozen plasma; packed red blood cells

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26815581     DOI: 10.1111/vec.12451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)        ISSN: 1476-4431


  4 in total

1.  In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units.

Authors:  C Blasi Brugué; Rui R F Ferreira; I Mesa Sanchez; Rita M C Graça; Inês M Cardoso; Augusto J F de Matos; Rafael Ruiz de Gopegui
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Hemostatic Activity of Canine Never-Frozen Liquid Plasma Collected for Transfusion.

Authors:  Daniela Proverbio; Roberta Perego; Luciana Baggiani; Eva Spada
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Alloimmunization in dogs after transfusion: A serial cross-match study.

Authors:  Lisa Herter; Christiane Weingart; Nina Merten; Nicole Bock; Roswitha Merle; Barbara Kohn
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.175

4.  Accuracy of point-of-care crossmatching methods and crossmatch incompatibility in critically ill dogs.

Authors:  Hayden Marshall; Shauna L Blois; Anthony C G Abrams-Ogg; Alexa M Bersenas; Kristiina Ruotsalo; Gabrielle Monteith
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.175

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.