A Rogers1, F B Rogers2, C W Schwab3, E Bradburn4, J Lee5, D Wu6, J A Miller7. 1. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. arogers2@lghealth.org. 2. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. frogers2@lghealth.org. 3. The Trauma Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Charles.schwab@uphs.upenn.edu. 4. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. ehbradburn@carilionclinic.org. 5. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. jclee@lghealth.org. 6. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. dwu2@lghealth.org. 7. Lancaster General Health, 555 N. Duke St., Lancaster, PA, 17602, USA. jvmiller@lghealth.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has determined that a 5 % pre-hospital undertriage [UT; defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 and not sent to a trauma center] is an acceptable rate for pre-hospital transfer to a non-trauma center. We sought to determine if this level of undertriage is acceptable within a mature Level II trauma center as a measure of the adequacy of its trauma activation system. METHODS: Our trauma activation system encompasses anatomic, physiologic, and mechanism of injury criteria. We defined UT as ISS > 15 and no trauma activation. All UT patients during the period 2000-2010 were compared to properly triaged patients (CT). The variables examined were mortality, emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, complications, Coumadin use, and age >64 years. RESULTS: There were 18,324 patients admitted, with 1,156 (6.3 %) UT. UT is associated with an increase in mortality [odds ratio (OR) 3.0; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.4-3.8; p < 0.001), longer ED LOS (OR 54.5; 95 % CI 45.5-63.5; p < 0.001), and longer hospital LOS (OR 1.7; 95 % CI 1.4-2.1; p < 0.001). In addition, UT patients had a two-fold increase in complications (OR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.6-2.5; p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥65 years, Revised Trauma Score (RTS) > 7.0, and one or more co-morbidities, UT patients had 2.18 times higher odds of mortality than their CT counterparts (OR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.57-3.01; p < 0.001). Patients on pre-hospital Coumadin (OR 3.61; 95 % CI 3.04-4.30; p < 0.001) and age >64 years (OR 4.93; 95 % CI 4.36-5.58; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of being undertriaged. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trauma activation criteria may not be adequate to identify the at-risk severely injured trauma patient. Further refinement of in-house trauma triage protocols is necessary if trauma centers are to improve outcomes following trauma.
PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has determined that a 5 % pre-hospital undertriage [UT; defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 and not sent to a trauma center] is an acceptable rate for pre-hospital transfer to a non-trauma center. We sought to determine if this level of undertriage is acceptable within a mature Level II trauma center as a measure of the adequacy of its trauma activation system. METHODS: Our trauma activation system encompasses anatomic, physiologic, and mechanism of injury criteria. We defined UT as ISS > 15 and no trauma activation. All UT patients during the period 2000-2010 were compared to properly triaged patients (CT). The variables examined were mortality, emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, complications, Coumadin use, and age >64 years. RESULTS: There were 18,324 patients admitted, with 1,156 (6.3 %) UT. UT is associated with an increase in mortality [odds ratio (OR) 3.0; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.4-3.8; p < 0.001), longer ED LOS (OR 54.5; 95 % CI 45.5-63.5; p < 0.001), and longer hospital LOS (OR 1.7; 95 % CI 1.4-2.1; p < 0.001). In addition, UT patients had a two-fold increase in complications (OR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.6-2.5; p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥65 years, Revised Trauma Score (RTS) > 7.0, and one or more co-morbidities, UT patients had 2.18 times higher odds of mortality than their CT counterparts (OR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.57-3.01; p < 0.001). Patients on pre-hospital Coumadin (OR 3.61; 95 % CI 3.04-4.30; p < 0.001) and age >64 years (OR 4.93; 95 % CI 4.36-5.58; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of being undertriaged. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Standard trauma activation criteria may not be adequate to identify the at-risk severely injured traumapatient. Further refinement of in-house trauma triage protocols is necessary if trauma centers are to improve outcomes following trauma.
Authors: Robert A Cherry; Eric Bradburn; Pamela A Nichols; Theresa M Snavely; Susan Janine Boehmer; David T Mauger Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Amelia Rogers; Frederick Rogers; Eric Bradburn; Margaret Krasne; John Lee; Daniel Wu; Mathew Edavettal; Michael Horst Journal: Am Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Barbara Haas; David Gomez; Brandon Zagorski; Therese A Stukel; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Avery B Nathens Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Michael M Dinh; Matthew Oliver; Kendall J Bein; Susan Roncal; Christopher M Byrne Journal: Emerg Med Australas Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: B K Dodson; M Braswell; A P David; J S Young; L M Riccio; Y Kim; J F Calland Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.341