N Colgrave1. 1. Tobruk Lines Health Centre, Holsworthy Barracks, Sydney, NSW, 2173, Australia. ncolgrav@med.usyd.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify and review literature relevant to the medical response to the 921 earthquake in order to analyse Taiwan's immediate and long-term management of the medical issues arising from the disaster. METHODS: Pubmed and Google Scholar searches were conducted in June 2008 to identify papers relevant to the topic. These were reviewed and the findings of each collated to develop a critical review of Taiwan's response to the earthquake. Pubmed and Google Scholar searches were conducted again in March 2010 to verify the currency of the literature reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 14 papers were identified and reviewed. Many concluded that while disaster response efforts were initiated quickly, the inexperience of the authorities, the timing and location of the earthquake, and the associated destruction of vital infrastructure, meant much of the initial rescue planning and coordination was improvised. This resulted in poor response times by emergency teams, inefficient mobilisation of military and medical resources, poor cooperation between authorities and a failure to fully utilise international assistance when it arrived. CONCLUSION: Taiwan was unprepared for a disaster of the magnitude of the 921 earthquake. The government has since taken initiatives to ensure Taiwan is better prepared for any future large scale disaster, including the establishment of the National Institute for Disaster Management. There is a paucity of literature on the medical response to the disaster. Only one new paper of relevance to the topic has been listed on Pubmed or Google Scholar in recent years.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify and review literature relevant to the medical response to the 921 earthquake in order to analyse Taiwan's immediate and long-term management of the medical issues arising from the disaster. METHODS: Pubmed and Google Scholar searches were conducted in June 2008 to identify papers relevant to the topic. These were reviewed and the findings of each collated to develop a critical review of Taiwan's response to the earthquake. Pubmed and Google Scholar searches were conducted again in March 2010 to verify the currency of the literature reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 14 papers were identified and reviewed. Many concluded that while disaster response efforts were initiated quickly, the inexperience of the authorities, the timing and location of the earthquake, and the associated destruction of vital infrastructure, meant much of the initial rescue planning and coordination was improvised. This resulted in poor response times by emergency teams, inefficient mobilisation of military and medical resources, poor cooperation between authorities and a failure to fully utilise international assistance when it arrived. CONCLUSION: Taiwan was unprepared for a disaster of the magnitude of the 921 earthquake. The government has since taken initiatives to ensure Taiwan is better prepared for any future large scale disaster, including the establishment of the National Institute for Disaster Management. There is a paucity of literature on the medical response to the disaster. Only one new paper of relevance to the topic has been listed on Pubmed or Google Scholar in recent years.
Authors: Edbert B Hsu; Matthew Ma; Fang Yue Lin; Michael J VanRooyen; Frederick M Burkle Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2002 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.040