Literature DB >> 26814719

Transdermal Diagnosis of Malaria Using Vapor Nanobubbles.

Ekaterina Lukianova-Hleb, Sarah Bezek, Reka Szigeti, Alexander Khodarev, Thomas Kelley, Andrew Hurrell, Michail Berba, Nirbhay Kumar, Umberto D'Alessandro, Dmitri Lapotko.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles spp.; Plasmodium falciparum; bloodless; diagnosis; haemozoin; hemozoin; laser; malaria; malaria pigment; nanobubble; noninvasive; parasites; vector-borne infections

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26814719      PMCID: PMC4734538          DOI: 10.3201/eid2202.151829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
In Response: The letter by Rebelo et al. () that questions our previously described noninvasive malaria diagnostics (,) misinterprets both articles. The main objection comes to our alleged call for “large-scale studies in humans”; no such statement appeared in our 2014 article (), and in the 2015 article (), we clearly stated that large-scale studies will be considered after the optimization of a new prototype and improving its sensitivity. The authors’ final questioning of our eligibility for resources is a nonscientific opinion. Concerning the quality of the standard clinical diagnosis, both thin blood film analysis and rapid diagnostic test results were obtained in a certified US clinical laboratory and returned consistent data. The lack of re-evaluation of the patient and the diagnostic timing are indeed limitations but were caused by the clinical restrictions. Our goal in the 2015 article () was to demonstrate the first noninvasive diagnosis of malaria in a human, which was achieved. The additional parameters discussed in the letter were not the subject of this study. Their letter further misinterprets our 2014 study, stating that parasitemia was virtual in that article; in fact, we studied actual infections among mice (). The criticism of Rebelo et al. might have been fueled by their own limited detection of hemozoin with flow cytometry and microscopy (), in which they used parasite cultures and an unspecified number of malaria patients. That the methods they used might not have performed well does not mean that the novel technology we described, based upon a different mechanism, would have the same limitations in detecting hemozoin. In conclusion, we agree with the need for optimization of the technology and additional testing. We are currently developing and testing our technology in a malaria-endemic country. Nevertheless, the letter by Rebello et al. does not alter the fact that our novel noninvasive malaria diagnostic technology worked in a human.
  4 in total

1.  Haemozoin detection in infected erythrocytes for Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnosis-prospects and limitations.

Authors:  Maria Rebelo; Howard M Shapiro; Teresa Amaral; José Melo-Cristino; Thomas Hänscheid
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.112

2.  Hemozoin-generated vapor nanobubbles for transdermal reagent- and needle-free detection of malaria.

Authors:  Ekaterina Y Lukianova-Hleb; Kelly M Campbell; Pamela E Constantinou; Janet Braam; John S Olson; Russell E Ware; David J Sullivan; Dmitri O Lapotko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transdermal Diagnosis of Malaria Using Vapor Nanobubbles.

Authors:  Ekaterina Lukianova-Hleb; Sarah Bezek; Reka Szigeti; Alexander Khodarev; Thomas Kelley; Andrew Hurrell; Michail Berba; Nirbhay Kumar; Umberto D'Alessandro; Dmitri Lapotko
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Transdermal Diagnosis of Malaria Using Vapor Nanobubbles.

Authors:  Maria Rebelo; Rita Grenho; Agnes Orban; Thomas Hänscheid
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.