| Literature DB >> 26813920 |
Monika Mishra1, Kamal Kumar Gupta2, Sarita Kumar1.
Abstract
Helicoverpa armigera Hübner is one of the most important agricultural crop pests in the world causing heavy crop yield losses. The continued and indiscriminate use of synthetic insecticides in agriculture for their control has received wide public apprehension because of multifarious problems, including insecticide resistance, resurgence of pest species, environmental pollution, and toxic hazards to humans and nontarget organisms. These problems have necessitated the need to explore and develop alternative strategies using eco-friendly and biodegradable plant products. In view of this, the efficacy of Thevetia neriifolia methanol stem extract was evaluated against the early fourth instars of H. armigera as an antifeedant and stomach poison agent. Feeding of larvae with the diet containing 0.005%-5.0% extract resulted in 2.06%-37.35% antifeedant index; the diet with 5.0% extract caused 54.3% reduced consumption. The negative impact of extract on larval feeding resulted in 37.5%-77.7% starvation, causing adverse effects on the larval weight. Choice between control and experimental diet resulted in feeding preference of larvae for the control diet, leading to 7.3%-42.9% reduced consumption of extract-containing diet. The only exception was the diet with 0.005% extract, which could not cause any deterrence. The midgut histological architecture of H. armigera larvae fed with 0.005%-0.05% extract-containing diet with negligible antifeedant potential showed significant damage, shrinkage, and distortion and vacuolization of gut tissues and peritrophic membrane, causing the disintegration of epithelial, goblet, and regenerative cells; the damage increased with the increase in concentration. These changes in the gut caused negative impact on the digestion and absorption of food and thus nutritional deficiency in the larvae, which could probably affect their growth and development. This study reveal the appreciable stomach poison potential of T. neriifolia stem methanol extract against H. armigera larvae, which can be explored as an eco-friendly pest control strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Helicoverpa armigera; Thevetia neriifolia; antifeedant; histopathology; midgut epithelium; starvation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26813920 PMCID: PMC4722878 DOI: 10.4137/IJIS.S29127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Insect Sci ISSN: 1179-5433
Antifeedant no-choice assay against early IV instars of Helicoverpa armigera when fed on 1 g artificial diet containing stem methanol extract of Thevetia neriifolia.
| CONCENTRATION OF EXTRACT (%) | FINAL WEIGHT OF DIET (g) MEAN ± SE | DIET INGESTED (g) MEAN ± SE | ANTIFEEDENT INDEX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.578 ± 0.025a | 0.421 ± 0.0246a | – |
| 0.005 | 0.596 ± 0.011a | 0.404 ± 0.011a | 1.20 ± 0.26a |
| 0.01 | 0.624 ± 0.002a | 0.376 ± 0.002a | 2.06 ± 0.89a,b |
| 0.05 | 0.664 ± 0.042a,b | 0.336 ± 0.042a,b | 5.64 ± 1.04a,b |
| 0.1 | 0.666 ± 0.009b | 0.334 ± 0.009b | 11.37 ± 1.36b |
| 0.5 | 0.667 ± 0.017b | 0.333 ± 0.017b | 11.54 ± 2.48b |
| 1.0 | 0.677 ± 0.010b | 0.323 ± 0.010b | 11.81 ± 1.15b |
| 5.0 | 0.808 ± 0.008b | 0.192 ± 0.008c | 13.17 ± 2.06b |
Notes: Mean ± SE, calculated for five replicates, each replicate with 10 larvae. Figures in each column followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s all pair wise multiple comparison test).
Food preference (choice) assay against early IV instars of Helicoverpa armigera when fed on 1 g artificial diet containing stem methanol extract of Thevetia neriifolia.
| CONCENTRATION OF EXTRACT (%) | ASSAY | FINAL DIET WEIGHT (g) MEAN ± SE | DIET INGESTED (g) MEAN ± SE | % RELATIVE CONSUMPTION | CHOICE/PREFERENCE INDEX | ANTIFEEDENT INDEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.005 | Treated | 0.567 ± 0.0454a | 0.433 ± 0.0454a | 50.92 | 1.03 | −1.80 ± 0.57a |
| Control | 0.583 ± 0.0407a | 0.417 ± 0.0407a | 49.05 | |||
| 0.01 | Treated | 0.682 ± 0.0312a | 0.318 ± 0.0312b | 48.25 | 0.93 | 3.49 ± 0.92a |
| Control | 0.659 ± 0.0378a | 0.341 ± 0.0378b | 51.75 | |||
| 0.05 | Treated | 0.809 ± 0.0370c | 0.191 ± 0.0370c | 46.35 | 0.86 | 7.28 ± 1.16a |
| Control | 0.779 ± 0.0130c | 0.221 ± 0.0130c | 53.64 | |||
| 0.1 | Treated | 0.733 ± 0.0261d | 0.267 ± 0.0261d | 46.11 | 0.86 | 7.77 ± 1.23a,b |
| Control | 0.688 ± 0.0158d | 0.312 ± 0.0158d | 53.88 | |||
| 0.5 | Treated | 0.821 ± 0.0165e | 0.179 ± 0.0165e | 44.52 | 0.80 | 10.94 ± 1.09b |
| Control | 0.777 ± 0.0146e1 | 0.223 ± 0.0146e1 | 55.47 | |||
| 1.0 | Treated | 0.703 ± 0.0147f | 0.297 ± 0.0147f | 38.17 | 0.62 | 23.65 ± 2.36c |
| Control | 0.519 ± 0.0086f1 | 0.481 ± 0.0086f1 | 61.82 | |||
| 5.0 | Treated | 0.909 ± 0.0041g | 0.091 ± 0.004g | 28.52 | 0.40 | 42.94 ± 2.14d |
| Control | 0.772 ± 0.0166g1 | 0.228 ± 0.0166g1 | 71.47 |
Notes:
Mean ± SE, calculated for five replicates, each replicate with 10 larvae.
Means followed by the same letter for a specific concentration regimen are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test).
Figure in each column followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s all pair wise multiple comparison test).
Starvation Index of early IV instars of Helicoverpa armigera when fed on 1 g artificial diet containing stem methanol extract of Thevetia neriifolia.
| CONCENTRATION OF EXTRACT (%) | INITIAL WEIGHT (g/LARVA) MEAN ± SE | FINAL WEIGHT (g/LARVA) MEAN ± SE | DIFFERENCE IN MEAN WEIGHT (g/LARVA) | % CHANGE IN WEIGHT | STARVATION INDEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0625 ± 0.0018a | 0.2834 ± 0.0036a | 0.2209 ± 0.0036a | (++) 353.52 | – |
| Starved | 0.0634 ± 0.0043a | 0.0538 ± 0.0041b | 0.0096 ± 0.0027b | (−) 13.07 | 91.67 ± 3.74a |
| 0.005 | 0.0689 ± 0.0030a | 0.2033 ± 0.0090c | 0.1344 ± 0.0103c | (++) 194.92 | 37.52 ± 2.04b |
| 0.01 | 0.0672 ± 0.0065a | 0.1957 ± 0.0088c,d | 0.1285 ± 0.0235c,d | (+) 191.22 | 40.08 ± 5.89b,c |
| 0.05 | 0.0664 ± 0.0018a | 0.1899 ± 0.0107d | 0.1234 ± 0.0105d | (++) 185.78 | 42.29 ± 1.85c |
| 0.1 | 0.0696 ± 0.0025a | 0.1692 ± 0.0064e | 0.0933 ± 0.0062e | (++) 134.05 | 55.35 ± 4.32d |
| 0.5 | 0.0647 ± 0.0061a | 0.1388 ± 0.0112f | 0.0741 ± 0.0049f | (+) 114.52 | 63.68 ± 2.94e |
| 1.0 | 0.0622 ± 0.0025a | 0.1080 ± 0.0035g | 0.0458 ± 0.0028g | (++) 73.63 | 75.96 ± 5.85f |
| 5.0 | 0.0671 ± 0.0028a | 0.1089 ± 0.0023g | 0.0418 ± 0.0033g | (++) 62.32 | 77.70 ± 1.38f |
Notes: Mean ± SE, calculated for five replicates, each replicate with 10 larvae. Figures in each column followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s all pair wise multiple comparison test).
Figure 1(A) T.S. of the midgut of IV instars of Helicoverpa armigera fed on control diet (40X); (B) Enlarged view of the midgut section.
Abbreviations: BM, Basement membrane; EC, Epithelial cell; GC, Goblet cell; GL, Gut lumen; MV, Microvilli; NU, Nucleus; PM, Peritrophic membrane; RC, Regenerative cell.
Figure 2T.S. of the midgut of IV instars of Helicoverpa armigera fed on the diet treated with Thevetia neriifolia stem methanol extract (40X) at (A) 0.005%; (B) 0.008%; (C) 0.01%; (D) 0.02% and (E) 0.05%; (F) Enlarged view of the midgut section of the larva fed on 0.05% Thevetia neriifolia stem methanol extract.
Abbreviations: BM, Basement membrane; DA, Detached area; DBL, Disappeared boundary lines; DEC, Disintegrated epithelial cell; EC, Epithelial cell; GC, Goblet cell; GL, Gut lumen; PM, Peritrophic membrane.