Literature DB >> 26813404

Comparison of laparoscopic and open cystectomy for bladder cancer: a single center of 110 cases report.

Wei Zheng1, Xuesong Li1, Gang Song1, Zheng Zhang1, Wei Yu1, Kan Gong1, Yi Song1, Qian Zhang1, Zhisong He1, Yinglu Guo1, Liqun Zhou1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the operative time, complications, blood loss, total cost, and hospital days of laparoscopic cystectomy vs. open cystectomy for bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, nonrandomized study was conducted between January 2004 and March 2011 on 110 patients (17 women and 93 men) who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. A total of 45 cystectomies were performed laparoscopically and 65 by open surgery. Mean patient age was 62.9±10.4 years. The age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histopathological results etc. were reviewed in this article.
RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group (821±776 vs. 1112±706 mL, P=0.044) while operative time was significantly lower in the open surgery group (376±90 vs. 445±119 min, P=0.001). The total costs were also significantly lower in the open surgery group 51,726±13,589 yuan (about $8000) vs. 63,053±19,378 yuan (about $10,000), P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, postoperative days in hospital between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cystectomy can reduce intraoperative blood loss significantly. Open cystectomy requires less operative time and has a lower cost than laparoscopic cystectomy for bladder cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rates in the hospital between the two groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; cystectomy; laparoscopy surgery; open surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 26813404      PMCID: PMC4713212          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.02.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  11 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on bladder cancer.

Authors:  Willem Oosterlinck; Bernard Lobel; Gerhard Jakse; Per-Uno Malmström; Michael Stöckle; Cora Sternberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Urologic laparoscopy.

Authors:  C L Jackson
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  [Radical cystectomy and laparoscopic ileal conduit].

Authors:  E Sánchez de Badajoz; J L Gallego Perales; A Reche Rosado; J M Gutiérrez de la Cruz; A Jiménez Garrido
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 0.436

4.  Technique of radical cystectomy.

Authors:  D G Skinner
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases.

Authors:  I S Gill; A Fergany; E A Klein; J H Kaouk; G T Sung; A M Meraney; S J Savage; J C Ulchaker; A C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: a comparison with the open approach.

Authors:  Jay B Basillote; Corollos Abdelshehid; Thomas E Ahlering; Allan M Shanberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder.

Authors:  R O Parra; C H Andrus; J P Jones; J A Boullier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Complications of radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  D G Skinner; E D Crawford; J J Kaufman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Arnulf Stenzl; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Gerhard Jakse; Marcus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Maria José Ribal; Amir Sherif; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Surendra B Kolla
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Morii; Takahiro Osawa; Teppei Suzuki; Nobuo Shinohara; Toru Harabayashi; Tomoki Ishikawa; Takumi Tanikawa; Hiroko Yamashina; Katsuhiko Ogasawara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic cystectomy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jialiang Zhu; Ziwen Lu; Wanbo Chen; Mang Ke; Xianguo Cai
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.