Literature DB >> 26813002

A multi-site study of strategies to teach critical thinking: 'why do you think that?'.

Grace C Huang1,2,3, Deborah Lindell4, Lynn E Jaffe5, Amy M Sullivan1,2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Critical thinking (CT) is a fundamental skill for clinicians. It plays an essential role in clinical decision making, which has implications for diagnostic accuracy, appropriate management and, ultimately, patient outcomes. Many theoretical frameworks have conceptualised CT and its related constructs. Nevertheless, it is unclear how this topic is taught by faculty staff who teach health professionals.
METHODS: The purpose of this multi-site qualitative study was to characterise the instructional strategies of faculty members actively teaching CT. We used semi-structured interviews to answer the following questions: (i) What approaches do faculty staff recognised by peers as good teachers in CT use to teach CT? (ii) How explicit is this teaching? We used snowball recruitment at eight participating institutions to identify faculty staff considered to be local experts in teaching CT. Forty-four eligible faculty members agreed to participate in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded and transcribed. We used the framework method to analyse the qualitative data.
RESULTS: We organised the findings into themes of what faulty staff teach to learners (habits of mind, such as higher-order thinking and metacognition), how they teach (guiding principles of clinical relevance and perspective shifting, and concrete strategies such as questioning and group interaction) and why they teach CT (to produce the best possible health outcomes for patients).
CONCLUSION: This work has practical recommendations for the individual faculty member. Promoting higher-level cognition, asking questions that probe the learner's understanding and linking discussions to the clinical context are some of the approaches that can be incorporated immediately.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26813002     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

1.  A way forward for teaching and learning of Physiology: Students' perception of the effectiveness of teaching methodologies.

Authors:  Rabiya Rehan; Khalid Ahmed; Hira Khan; Rehana Rehman
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers.

Authors:  Lynn E Jaffe; Deborah Lindell; Amy M Sullivan; Grace C Huang
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-10

3.  Questioning Aid for Rich, Real-Time Discussion (QARRD): A Tool to Improve Critical Thinking in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Russell W Farmer; Staci Saner; Laura A Weingartner; Gerard Rabalais
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Effect of Concept Mapping Education on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students: A Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Aslami Maryam; Dehghani Mohammadreza; Shakurnia Abdolhussein; Ramezani Ghobad; Kojuri Javad
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2021-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.