| Literature DB >> 26812947 |
Christina Doesch1, Dirk Lossnitzer1, Boris Rudic1, Erol Tueluemen1, Johannes Budjan2, Holger Haubenreisser2, Thomas Henzler2, Stefan O Schoenberg2, Martin Borggrefe1, Theano Papavassiliu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES ANDEntities:
Keywords: MAPSE; TAPSE; atrial fibrillation; cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; late gadolinium enhancement
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26812947 PMCID: PMC4716814 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.13530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
A CMR characteristics of Patients with HCM and healthy controls
| All patients with HCM (n=98) | Healthy Controls (n=30) | p-value all patients with HCM vs healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 56±14 | 50±8 | 0.06 |
| Male gender (n/%) | 67 (68) | 23 (77) | 0.5 |
| LV-EF(%) | 61±10 | 59±4 | 0.3 |
| LV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 77±20 | 71±15 | 0.2 |
| LV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 31±15 | 30±5 | 0.2 |
| LV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 46±12 | 45±10 | 0.3 |
| LV-EDMI (g·m-2) | 99±33 | 60±11 | <0.0001 |
| LVRI (g/ml) | 1.3±0.5 | 0.9±0.3 | 0.0003 |
| LV EDD (mm) | 52±7 | 50±4 | 0.2 |
| SWT (mm) | 20±5 | 9±2 | <0.0001 |
| PWT (mm) | 10±3 | 8±2 | 0.0001 |
| indexed LA volume (ml·m-2) | 49±24 | 22±3 | <0.0001 |
| Septal MAPSE (cm) | 0.94±0.37 | 1.29±0.27 | <0.0001 |
| TAPSE (cm) | 1.78±0.58 | 2.03±0.17 | 0.03 |
| RV-EF (%) | 62±11 | 58±4 | 0.08 |
| RV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 71±21 | 69±12 | 0.7 |
| RV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 28±13 | 28±6 | 0.8 |
| RV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 43±11 | 41±7 | 0.3 |
| RVEDD (mm) | 42±6 | 41±7 | 0.3 |
| RVESD (mm) | 28±7 | 27±6 | 0.5 |
| RAD (mm) | 43±7 | 40±4 | 0.05 |
| Presence of ≥ moderate mitral regurgitation | 12 (12) | 0 | - |
| Presence of LGE | 63 (64) | 0 | - |
| LGE Extent (%) | 13±14 | 0 | - |
Data are presented as ± standard deviation. Volumes are indexed to body surface area.
EDD=end diastolic dimension, EDMI= end diastolic mass index, EDVI=end diastolic volume index, ESVI=end systolic volume index, LA= left atrial, LGE= late gadolinium enhancement, LV= left ventricular, LVRI= left ventricular remodeling index, MAPSE = mitral annular plane systolic excursion, PWT=posterior wall thickness, SR=sinus rhythm, SWT=septal wall thickness
CMR characteristics of Patients with HCM and SR compared to Healthy Controls
| Healthy Controls (n=30) | HCM patients remaining in SR (n=60) | p-value HCM patients remaining in SR vs healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 50±8 | 53±14 | 0.4 |
| Male gender n (%) | 23 (77) | 45 (75) | 0.9 |
| LV-EF (%) | 59±4 | 63±9 | 0.03 |
| LV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 71±15 | 77±17 | 0.1 |
| LV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 30±5 | 30±12 | 0.3 |
| LV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 45±10 | 47±11 | 0.1 |
| LV-EDMI (g·m-2) | 60±11 | 101±33 | <0.0001 |
| LVRI (g/ml) | 0.9±0.3 | 1.3±0.5 | 0.001 |
| LV EDD (mm) | 50±4 | 53±6 | 0.05 |
| SWT (mm) | 9±2 | 20±6 | <0.0001 |
| PWT (mm) | 8±2 | 10±3 | 0.001 |
| Indexed LA volume (ml·m-2) | 22±3 | 44±21 | <0.0001 |
| Septal MAPSE (cm) | 1.29±0.27 | 1.04±0.38 | 0.003 |
| TAPSE | 2.03±0.17 | 1.91±0.59 | 0.3 |
| RV-EF (%) | 58±4 | 63±11 | 0.07 |
| RV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 69±12 | 71±23 | 0.5 |
| RV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 28±6 | 27±13 | 0.7 |
| RV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 41±7 | 44±10 | 0.2 |
| RVEDD (mm) | 41±7 | 42±6 | 0.2 |
| RVESD (mm) | 27±6 | 28±7 | 0.5 |
| RAD (mm) | 40±4 | 42±7 | 0.3 |
| Presence of ≥ moderate mitral regurgitation n (%) | 0 | 6 (10) | - |
| Presence of LGE | 0 | 36 (60) | - |
| LGE Extent (%) | 0 | 11±12 | - |
Data are presented as ± standard deviation. Volumes are indexed to body surface area.
EDD=end diastolic dimension, EDMI= end diastolic mass index, EDVI=end diastolic volume index, ESVI=end systolic volume index, LA= left atrial, LGE= late gadolinium enhancement, LV= left ventricular, LVRI= left ventricular remodeling index, MAPSE = mitral annular plane systolic excursion, PWT=posterior wall thickness, SWT=septal wall thickness
CMR characteristics of Patients with HCM with regard to AF
| HCM patients remaining in SR (n=60) | Patients with AF at initial diagnosis (n=19) | p-value | Patients with AF during follow-up (n=19) | p-value HCM patients remaining in SR vs HCM patients with AF during follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 53±14 | 63±11 | 0.01 | 59±11 | 0.1 |
| Male gender | 45 (75) | 12 (63) | 0.2 | 10 (53) | 0.9 |
| LV-EF (%) | 63±9 | 59±11 | 0.1 | 58±10 | 0.1 |
| LV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 77±17 | 78±27 | 0.8 | 75±22 | 0.6 |
| LV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 30±12 | 35±23 | 0.3 | 32±18 | 0.6 |
| LV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 47±11 | 48±15 | 0.9 | 41±13 | 0.1 |
| LV-EDMI (g·m-2) | 101±33 | 104±41 | 0.8 | 90±24 | 0.2 |
| LVRI (g/ml) | 1.3±0.5 | 1.4±0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3±0.3 | 0.5 |
| LV EDD (mm) | 53±6 | 51±8 | 0.5 | 51±7 | 0.2 |
| SWT (mm) | 20±6 | 19±4 | 0.5 | 20±5 | 0.8 |
| PWT (mm) | 10±3 | 10±2 | 0.7 | 10±2 | 0.8 |
| Indexed LA volume (ml·m-2) | 44±21 | 62±26 | 0.004 | 53±28 | 0.1 |
| Septal MAPSE (cm) | 1.04±0.38 | 0.76±0.38 | 0.01 | 0.80±0.19 | 0.01 |
| TAPSE | 1.91±0.59 | 1.57±0.59 | 0.03 | 1.60±0.43 | 0.02 |
| RV-EF (%) | 63±11 | 61±10 | 0.4 | 62±10 | 0.8 |
| RV-EDVI (ml·m-2) | 71±23 | 70±17 | 0.8 | 68±19 | 0.6 |
| RV-ESVI (ml·m-2) | 27±13 | 28±12 | 0.9 | 28±14 | 0.8 |
| RV-SVI (ml·m-2) | 44±10 | 42±11 | 0.5 | 40±11 | 0.2 |
| RVEDD (mm) | 42±6 | 41±6 | 0.2 | 42±6 | 0.9 |
| RVESD (mm) | 28±7 | 27±6 | 0.7 | 29±7 | 0.8 |
| RAD (mm) | 42±7 | 47±6 | 0.01 | 46±6 | 0.01 |
| Presence of ≥ moderate mitral regurgitation n (%) | 6 (10) | 4 (21) | 0.4 | 2 (22) | 0.9 |
| Presence of LGE | 36 (60) | 14 (74) | 0.6 | 13 (68) | 0.2 |
| LGE Extent (%) | 11±12 | 16±16 | 0.2 | 17±18 | 0.1 |
Data are presented as ± standard deviation. Volumes are indexed to body surface area.
EDD=end diastolic dimension, EDMI= end diastolic mass index, EDVI=end diastolic volume index, ESVI=end systolic volume index, LA= left atrial, LGE= late gadolinium enhancement, LV= left ventricular, LVRI= left ventricular remodeling index, MAPSE = mitral annular plane systolic excursion, PWT=posterior wall thickness, SWT=septal wall thickness
Figure 1Representative Figure. In patients with HCM remaining in sinus rhythm (A-C), in those with atrial fibrillation at intial diagnosis (D-F) and those developing atrial fibrillation during follow-up (G-I), septal MAPSE (black line B,E, H) was calculated by subtracting the end-systolic (B, E, H) from the end-diastolic length (A, D, G) and the RAD (C, F, I) was determined.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. ROC curves for TAPSE (Panel A), RAD (Panel B) and septal MAPSE (Panel C) to predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up.