Literature DB >> 26812903

European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukaemias.

M Malvezzi1, G Carioli2, P Bertuccio2, T Rosso2, P Boffetta3, F Levi4, C La Vecchia5, E Negri6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current cancer mortality statistics are important for public health decision-making and resource allocation. Age-standardized rates and numbers of deaths are predicted for 2016 in the European Union (EU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Population and death certification data for stomach, colorectum, pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, prostate, leukaemias and total cancers were obtained from the World Health Organization database and Eurostat. Figures were derived for the EU, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the UK. Projected numbers of deaths by age group were obtained for 2016 by linear regression on estimated numbers of deaths over the most recent time period identified by a joinpoint regression model.
RESULTS: Projected total cancer mortality trends for 2016 in the EU are favourable in both sexes with rates of 133.5/100 000 men and 85.2/100 000 women (8% and 3% falls since 2011) corresponding to 753 600 and 605 900 deaths in men and women for a total number of 1 359 500 projected cancer deaths (+3% compared with 2011, due to population ageing). In men, lung, colorectal and prostate cancer have fallen 11%, 5% and 8%, respectively, since 2011. Breast and colorectal cancer trends in women are favourable (8% and 7% falls, respectively), but lung and pancreatic cancer rates have risen 5% and 4% since 2011 reaching rates of 14.4 and 5.6/100 000 women. Leukaemias show favourable projected mortality for both sexes and all age groups, with stronger falls in the younger age groups. All ages rates are 4.0/100 000 men and 2.5/100 000 women, with falls of 14% and 12% respectively.
CONCLUSION: The 2016 predictions for EU cancer mortality confirm the favourable trends in rates particularly for men. Lung cancer is likely to be the leading site for female cancer rates. Continuing falls in mortality, larger in children and young adults, are predicted in leukaemias, essentially due to advancements in management and therapy, and their subsequent adoption across Europe.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; cancer; leukaemia; mortality; projections; time trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26812903     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  52 in total

1.  The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in cancer rehabilitation: current prescription, pitfalls, and future directions.

Authors:  Dominic O'Connor; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Association between the dietary inflammatory index and breast cancer in a large Italian case-control study.

Authors:  Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Valentina Rosato; Maurizio Montella; Diego Serraino; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.914

3.  Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Expression of Breast Markers in Basal-like Breast Carcinomas Defined as Triple Negative Cancers Expressing Keratin 5.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Identification of genes highly downregulated in pancreatic cancer through a meta-analysis of microarray datasets: implications for discovery of novel tumor-suppressor genes and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Nalin C W Goonesekere; Wyatt Andersen; Alex Smith; Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Degree of desmoplasia in metastatic lymph node lesions is associated with lesion size and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Hiromichi Nakayama; Kenoki Ohuchida; Masaki Yoshida; Tetsuyuki Miyazaki; Shin Takesue; Toshiya Abe; Sho Endo; Kazuhiro Koikawa; Takashi Okumura; Taiki Moriyama; Kohei Nakata; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Kengo Shirahane; Tatsuya Manabe; Takao Ohtsuka; Hiroki Toma; Yohei Tominaga; Eishi Nagai; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Yoshinao Oda; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Geographical variations of socioeconomic status and prostate cancer mortality in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Yung Su
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Spatial Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer in South Dakota.

Authors:  Muslim Atiq; Kay Dosch; Ashley Miller; Ramu G Sudhagoni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

Review 9.  Metabolomics in pancreatic cancer biomarkers research.

Authors:  Jaroslav Tumas; Kotryna Kvederaviciute; Marius Petrulionis; Benediktas Kurlinkus; Arnas Rimkus; Greta Sakalauskaite; Jonas Cicenas; Audrius Sileikis
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Second-generation inflammation-related scores are more effective than systemic inflammation ratios in predicting prognosis of patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe A Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.