| Literature DB >> 26812373 |
Kimberly M Fornace, Tommy Rowel Abidin, Neal Alexander, Paddy Brock, Matthew J Grigg, Amanda Murphy, Timothy William, Jayaram Menon, Chris J Drakeley, Jonathan Cox.
Abstract
The zoonotic malaria species Plasmodium knowlesi has become the main cause of human malaria in Malaysian Borneo. Deforestation and associated environmental and population changes have been hypothesized as main drivers of this apparent emergence. We gathered village-level data for P. knowlesi incidence for the districts of Kudat and Kota Marudu in Sabah state, Malaysia, for 2008-2012. We adjusted malaria records from routine reporting systems to reflect the diagnostic uncertainty of microscopy for P. knowlesi. We also developed negative binomial spatial autoregressive models to assess potential associations between P. knowlesi incidence and environmental variables derived from satellite-based remote-sensing data. Marked spatial heterogeneity in P. knowlesi incidence was observed, and village-level numbers of P. knowlesi cases were positively associated with forest cover and historical forest loss in surrounding areas. These results suggest the likelihood that deforestation and associated environmental changes are key drivers in P. knowlesi transmission in these areas.Entities:
Keywords: Borneo; Malaysia; Plasmodium knowlesi; deforestation; macaques; malaria; mosquitoes; parasites; zoonoses
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26812373 PMCID: PMC4734530 DOI: 10.3201/eid2202.150656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Location of Kudat and Kota Marudu districts in Sabah, Malaysia, where study of association of landscape and environmental factors and incidence of Plasmodium knowlesi transmission was conducted. Stars indicate location of the district hospitals. Inset shows location of these districts on the island of Borneo (box).
Comparison of results of PCR and microscopy testing for Plasmodium knowlesi, Sabah, Malaysia, 2008–2012*
| Microscopy results | No. samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | |||
| 313 | 33 | 346 | |
| 16 | 177 | 193 | |
| Total | 329 | 210 | 539 |
*+, positive; –, negative.
Figure 2Comparison of estimated incidence (per 1,000 population) of Plasmodium knowlesi infection (A) and forest cover (B) and, Sabah, Malaysia, 2008–2012.
Land use characteristics and bivariable statistics in Plasmodium knowlesi study, Sabah, Malaysia, 2008–2012*
| Variable | Bivariable analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| IRR (95% CI) | p value | |
| % Forest remaining | ||
| ≤1 km radius | ||
| <65 | Reference | 0.59 |
| ≥65 | 1.08 (0.82–1.43) | |
| ≤2 km radius | ||
| <65 | Reference | 0.06 |
| ≥65 | 1.30 (0.99–1.71) | |
| ≤5 km radius | ||
| <65 | Reference | 0.77 |
| ≥65 | 1.05 (0.78–1.40) | |
| % Forest lost in current year† | ||
| ≤1 km radius | ||
| <1 | Reference | 0.11 |
| 1–2 | 0.94 (0.74–1.19) | |
| >2 | 1.22 (0.99–1.51) | |
| ≤2 km radius | ||
| <1 | Reference | 0.001 |
| 1–2 | ||
| >2 | 1.36 (1.09–1.71) | |
| ≤5 km radius | ||
| <1 | Reference | 0.01 |
| 1–2 | 0.97 (0.75–1.27) | |
| >2 | 1.57 (1.19–2.06) | |
| % Forest lost in past 5 years‡ | ||
| ≤1 km radius | ||
| <8 | Reference | 0.60 |
| 8–14 | 1.01 (0.76–1.33) | |
| >14 | 1.14 (0.85–1.53) | |
| ≤2 km radius | ||
| <8 | Reference | <0.001 |
| 8–14 | 1.66 (1.25–2.20) | |
| >14 | 2.03 (1.46–2.80) | |
| ≤5 km radius | ||
| <8 | Reference | 0.32 |
| 8–14 | 0.93 (0.69–1.25) | |
| >14 | 1.13 (0.81–1.58) | |
| Mean elevation per 10 m above sea level | ||
| ≤1 km radius | 0.99 (0.97–1.00) | 0.12 |
| ≤2 km radius | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | 0.06 |
| ≤5 km radius | 0.97 (0.96–0.99) | 0.01 |
| Travel time to clinic, min | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.001 |
*Radius is calculated as distance from village center. IRR, incident rate ratio. †Current year is the year for which incidence was calculated. ‡Five years before the specific year of reported incidence.
Multivariable negative binomial regression of P. knowlesi incidence (including population offset) in Plasmodium knowlesi study, Sabah, Malaysia, 2008–2012*
| Variable | IRR (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|
| % Forest remaining, ≤2 km radius | ||
| <65 | Reference | 0.0004 |
| ≥65 | 1.51 (1.42–1.99) |
|
| % Forest lost in the past 5 y, ≤2 km radius | ||
| <8 | Reference | <0.0001 |
| 8–14 | 1.68 (1.27–2.22) | |
| >14 | 2.22 (1.53–2.93) |
|
| Mean elevation per 10 m above sea level, ≤5 km radius | 0.98 (0.96–0.99) | 0.001 |
*Population was used as an offset to correct the number of infections reported for an estimate of the population size. Radius is calculated as distance from village center. IRR, incident rate ratio.