Literature DB >> 26812331

Estimation of the indigestible fiber in different forage types.

A Palmonari, A Gallo, M Fustini, G Canestrari, F Masoero, Charles J Sniffen, A Formigoni.   

Abstract

The role of indigestible NDF is essential in relation to OM digestibility prediction, total tract digestibility, rumen fill, passage rate, and digestion kinetics. Moreover, the truly indigestible NDF (iNDF) represents a core point in dynamic models used for diet formulations. However, despite its wide possible applications, few trials have been conducted to quantify iNDF and even fewer to investigate whether or not it is consistent among different forage sources. The objective of this study was to predict the iNDF by measuring the residual NDF after 240-h in vitro fermentation to determine the unavailable NDF (uNDF) within and among various forage types. Finally, a mathematical approach was investigated for the estimation of the uNDF fraction. In all, 688 forages were analyzed in this study. This pool included 122 alfalfa hays, 282 corn silages, and 284 grass hays. Values of uNDF varied among different forages and within the same type (22.7% ± 4.48%, 20.1% ± 4.23%, and 11.8% ± 3.5% DM for grass hay, alfalfa hay, and corn silages, respectively). The relationship among uNDF and ADL was not constant and, for grass hay and corn silage, was different ( 0.05) from the 2.4 × lignin value applied by the traditional Chandler equation. The observed uNDF:ADL ratio was 3.22 for grass hay and 3.11 for corn silage. Relationships among chemical and biological parameters and uNDF were investigated via simple and multiple regression equations. The greatest correlation with a single variable was obtained by ADL and ADF when applied to the whole data set ( = 0.63). Greater coefficients of determination resulted from a multiple regression equation for the whole data set ( = 0.80) and within each forage type ( = 0.65, 0.77, and 0.54 for grass hay, alfalfa hay, and corn silage, respectively). In conclusion, a regression approach requires specific equations and different regression coefficients for each forage type. The direct measurement of uNDF represented the best approach to obtain an accurate prediction of the iNDF and to optimize its specific purpose in dynamic nutrition models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26812331     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of in situ techniques to evaluate the recovery of indigestible components and the accuracy of digestibility estimates.

Authors:  Jordan M Adams; Aaron B Norris; Luiz F Dias Batista; Madeline E Rivera; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Assessment of in situ techniques to determine indigestible components in the feed and feces of cattle receiving supplemental condensed tannins1.

Authors:  Aaron B Norris; Luis O Tedeschi; James P Muir
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of alkaline and sonication pretreatments on the rumen degradability of date palm seeds.

Authors:  Ahmed Aboragah; Mohammed Embaby; Mevlüt Günal; Amer AbuGhazaleh
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Genomic Selection for Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Forage Quality Traits.

Authors:  Elisa Biazzi; Nelson Nazzicari; Luciano Pecetti; E Charles Brummer; Alberto Palmonari; Aldo Tava; Paolo Annicchiarico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility.

Authors:  Maria Chiaravalli; Luca Rapetti; Andrea Rota Graziosi; Gianluca Galassi; Gianni Matteo Crovetto; Stefania Colombini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effect of an Immunomodulatory Feed Additive in Mitigating the Stress Responses in Lactating Dairy Cows to a High Concentrate Diet Challenge.

Authors:  Damiano Cavallini; Ludovica M E Mammi; Alberto Palmonari; Ruben García-González; James D Chapman; Dereck J McLean; Andrea Formigoni
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.