| Literature DB >> 26811722 |
Somaia Saif Abu-Akkada1, Eman Dorry Hussein El Kerdany2, Rasha Fadly Mady2, Radwa Galal Diab2, Gehan Abd Elatti Khedr3, Karam Imam Ashmawy1, Wael Mohamed Lotfy4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Encephalitozoon cuniculi infects a wide range of homoeothermic animals, including man. Complications due to this microsporidian have been reported only in immunocompromised patients. Reports on E. cuniculi in immunocompetent humans are lacking, most probably, because it is not linked to any clinical manifestations in such hosts. The present work was carried out with the aim of studying, for the first time in Egypt, the prevalence of E. cuniculi infection of urinary tract among non-HIV immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent individuals. It tested also the influence of some factors on the risk of infection.Entities:
Keywords: Man; Microsporidia; Opportunistic; Protozoa
Year: 2015 PMID: 26811722 PMCID: PMC4724832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
Diagnosis of E. cuniculi infection in the studied groups as detected by IFAT, Weber’s green MTS smears and PCR
| Positive cases | IFAT | 34 (77.3%) | 5 (11.4%) | <0.001
|
| Weber’s green MTS | 30 (68.2%) | 2 (4.5%) | <0.001
| |
| PCR | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | - |
Group I: Immunocompromised patients/Group II: Immunocompetent individuals/
Student t-test statistically significant
Relation between infection and demographic data in the studied groups
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤50 | 21 | 16 (76.2%) | 0.027 | 37 | 3 (8.1%) | 2.447 |
| >50 | 23 | 18 (78.3%) | (1.000) | 7 | 2 (28.6%) | (0.173) |
| Male | 17 | 12 (70.6%) | 0.705 | 26 | 4 (15.4%) | 1.202 |
| Female | 27 | 22 (81.5%) | (0.473) | 18 | 1 (5.6%) | (0.634) |
| No | 18 | 14 (77.8%) | 0.004 | 31 | 1 (7.7%) | 6.899 |
| Yes | 26 | 20 (76.9%) | (1.000) | 13 | 4 (30.8%) | (0.022)
|
Group I: Immunocompromised patients/Group II: Immunocompetent individuals/χ: Chi square test/FE: Fisher exact test/
Statistically significant
Agreement (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) between IFAT, Weber’s green MTS smears and PCR results
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −ve | 44 | 12 | <0.001
| 69.23 | 89.80 | 84.38 | 78.57 | 80.68 |
| +ve | 5 | 27 | ||||||
| −ve | 49 | 39 | - | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 55.68 | 55.68 |
| +ve | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Positive predicted value/
Negative predicted value/
Statistically significant