Literature DB >> 26811435

A qualitative analysis of women's explanations for changing contraception: the importance of non-contraceptive effects.

Britta Wigginton1, Melissa L Harris2, Deborah Loxton3, Jayne C Lucke4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women commonly report changing contraceptive methods because of side-effects. However, there is a lack of literature that has thoroughly examined women's perspectives, including why they changed contraception. AIM: Using qualitative data from a contraceptive survey of young Australian women, we explored women's explanations for their recent changes in contraception.
METHOD: A thematic analysis of 1051 responses to a question about why women recently changed contraception was conducted.
RESULTS: Themes reflected reasons for changing contraception which included: both contraceptive and non-contraceptive (4%); relationship/sexual (9%); medical (11%); contraceptive (18%); non-contraceptive (41%). A minority of responses were uncoded (17%). Non-contraceptive effects (effects unrelated to pregnancy prevention) featured most frequently in women's reasons for changing contraception.
CONCLUSIONS: While cessation of various contraceptives due to unwanted side-effects is a well-known phenomenon, this analysis provides evidence of the changing of contraception for its non-contraceptive effects and reframes the notion of 'side-effects'. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; contraceptive changes; contraceptive discontinuation; qualitative analysis; side-effects; young women

Year:  2016        PMID: 26811435     DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  6 in total

1.  Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020).

Authors:  Fatima Leon-Larios; José Gutiérrez Ales; María José Puente Martínez; Marta Correa Rancel; Isabel Lahoz Pascual; Isabel Silva Reus; José Cruz Quílez Conde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Postpartum intentions on contraception use and method choice among breastfeeding women attending a university hospital in Ohio: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yiska Loewenberg Weisband; Lisa M Keder; Sarah A Keim; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  What do young Australian women want (when talking to doctors about contraception)?

Authors:  Denisa L Goldhammer; Catriona Fraser; Britta Wigginton; Melissa L Harris; Deborah Bateson; Deborah Loxton; Mary Stewart; Jacqueline Coombe; Jayne C Lucke
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Latin America and the Caribbean: current landscape and recommendations.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Claudio Villarroel; Natalia Frías Guzmán; Silvia Oizerovich; Norma Velázquez-Ramírez; Ilza Monteiro
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-01-23

5.  Norwegian women's experiences and opinions on contraceptive counselling: A systematic textcondensation study.

Authors:  Mirjam Lukasse; Marie Christine G Baglo; Eldri Engdal; Ragnhild Lassemo; Kristin E Forsberg
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.

Authors:  Ping Teresa Yeh; Hunied Kautsar; Caitlin E Kennedy; Mary E Gaffield
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.