Literature DB >> 26811147

Unexpected benign histopathology after pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy: accepting the inevitable.

Rachel M Gomes1, Munita Bal2, Shraddha Patkar1, Mahesh Goel1, Shailesh V Shrikhande3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiating malignant and benign disease in the pancreatic head and periampullary region is difficult. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze patients with unexpected "benign" disease after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) to evaluate the incidence, possible discriminating factors, and outcome. The role of preoperative pathology interpretation in diagnosing malignancy was also assessed.
METHODS: Patients with unexpected benign disease were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 446 PDs for presumed malignancy from April 2006 to December 2013. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features were reviewed. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of preoperative pathology interpretation were analyzed. Short-term outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Incidence of unexpected benign disease was 6.5 % (29/446). Radiological diagnostic signs (except the double duct sign) suggestive of malignancy were seen in more than half of the benign cases. Preoperative pathology 'positive' or 'suspicious for malignancy' had a PPV of 97.6 % and 'indeterminate disease' and had a PPV of 90 % for malignancy. 'Benign' or 'negative' pathology had a PPV of 19 % for benign disease in strongly suspected malignancy. There was no significant difference in outcomes in PD for benign versus malignant disease except for a decreased rate of POPFs and a higher trend toward mortality. However, both outcomes were not independently associated with benign disease.
CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of benign disease after PD for "strongly suspected malignancy" is inevitable. No radiological or pathological features can reliably discriminate benign from malignant in these patients. Trend toward higher mortality after PD for unexpected benign disease exists. Detailed preoperative pathological subclassifications are helpful in malignancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign disease; Chronic pancreatitis; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Periampullary tumors; Preoperative diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26811147     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1372-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  45 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  R E Jimenez; C Fernandez-del Castillo; D W Rattner; Y Chang; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The double duct sign in patients with malignant and benign pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  M Menges; M M Lerch; M Zeitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  CA19-9 serum levels in obstructive jaundice: clinical value in benign and malignant conditions.

Authors:  Daniele Marrelli; Stefano Caruso; Corrado Pedrazzani; Alessandro Neri; Eduardo Fernandes; Mario Marini; Enrico Pinto; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pancreatic disease: a reassessment of the specificity of ductal abnormalities indifferentiating benign from malignant disease.

Authors:  P W Ralls; J Halls; I Renner; H Juttner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; B A Somashekar; Kunal Suradkar; Guruprasad S Shetty; Sanjay Talole; Bhawna Sirohi; Mahesh Goel; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 7.  Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  W Hartwig; L Schneider; M K Diener; F Bergmann; M W Büchler; J Werner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Molecular markers for diagnostic cytology of neoplasms in the head region of the pancreas: mutation of K-ras and overexpression of the p53 protein product.

Authors:  J M van Es; M M Polak; F M van den Berg; T B Ramsoekh; M E Craanen; R H Hruban; G J Offerhaus
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Supreeta Arya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  When to perform a pancreatoduodenectomy in the absence of positive histology? A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; Kevin Conlon; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Mustapha Adham; Claudio Bassi; Maximilian Bockhorn; Markus Büchler; Richard M Charnley; Christos Dervenis; Abe Fingerhutt; Dirk J Gouma; Werner Hartwig; Clem Imrie; Jakob R Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; Miroslav Milicevic; Marco Montorsi; John P Neoptolemos; Aken A Sandberg; Michael Sarr; Charles Vollmer; Charles J Yeo; L William Traverso
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  1 in total

1.  Screening for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Are We Asking the Impossible?-Response.

Authors:  Katharine E Caldwell; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.