Literature DB >> 26810715

Osteosynthesis in sacral fracture and lumbosacral dislocation.

H Pascal-Moussellard1, C Hirsch2, R Bonaccorsi3.   

Abstract

Sacral fracture and lumbosacral hinge trauma are rare but serious lesions. Neurologic disorder is frequently associated, and nerve release may be required, with reduction and stabilization of the fracture. Management requires knowing the fracture lines and reduction maneuvers and the fixation techniques that may need to be associated. Three classifications allow these fractures to be well understood: the Roy-Camille classification identifies high transverse fractures and their displacement; the Denis classification identifies vertical fracture line location within the sacrum, which correlates with neurologic risk; and the Tile classification analyzes pelvic ring trauma when associated with the sacral fracture. Treatment, when surgical, requires careful patient positioning, sometimes on an orthopedic table. Reduction maneuvers are founded on the fracture classification. Isolated U-shaped fracture of the sacrum is to be distinguished from sacral fracture associated with pelvic ring lesion. Osteosynthesis may be lumbopelvic or restricted to the pelvic ring (sacroiliac or iliosacral). Open osteosynthesis allows reduction to be finalized by intraoperative maneuvers on the implant, while closed osteosynthesis requires perfect preoperative reduction. Complications are frequent and neurologic recovery is uncertain. Fatigue and osteoporotic fractures show little displacement and are good indications for cementoplasty, either isolated or associated to iliosacral screwing. In lumbosacral hinge trauma, and dislocation in particular, reduction surgery with fixation (usually 360°) is indicated. The present study details the analysis and classification of these fractures, the technical pitfalls of reduction and fixation, and treatment indications.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture classification; Lumbosacral hinge; Reduction maneuver; Sacral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810715     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  6 in total

1.  Classifications in Brief: The Denis Classification of Sacral Fractures.

Authors:  James M Rizkalla; Tanner Lines; Scott Nimmons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reinforced cementoplasty for pelvic tumour lesions and pelvic traumatic fractures: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Amira Al Raaisi; Kévin Premat; Evelyne Cormier; Eimad Shotar; Mehdi Drir; Véronique Morel; Jean-Philippe Spano; Hugues Pascal-Mousselard; Laetitia Morardet; Frédéric Clarençon; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Reduction and fixation of displaced U-shaped sacral fractures using lumbopelvic fixation: technical recommendations.

Authors:  Stefan Piltz; Bianka Rubenbauer; Wolfgang Böcker; Heiko Trentzsch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Jumper's fracture of the sacrum: a novel and reproducible way for successful reduction and fixation.

Authors:  Christian Kammerlander; Christian Ehrnthaller; Christoph Linhart; Nima Befrui; Lucas Etzel; Wolfgang Böcker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Traumatic Lumbosacral Dislocation: Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Andrew S Moon; Kivanc Atesok; Thomas E Niemeier; Sakthivel R Manoharan; Jason L Pittman; Steven M Theiss
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-28

6.  Relation of the lumbosacral trunk to the sacro-iliac joint.

Authors:  Peter Grechenig; Christoph Grechenig; Gloria Hohenberger; Marco Johannes Maier; Georg Lipnik; Angelika Schwarz; Theresa di Vora; Axel Gänsslen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.