Literature DB >> 26810359

Strategic level proton therapy patient admission planning: a Markov decision process modeling approach.

Ridvan Gedik1, Shengfan Zhang2, Chase Rainwater3.   

Abstract

A relatively new consideration in proton therapy planning is the requirement that the mix of patients treated from different categories satisfy desired mix percentages. Deviations from these percentages and their impacts on operational capabilities are of particular interest to healthcare planners. In this study, we investigate intelligent ways of admitting patients to a proton therapy facility that maximize the total expected number of treatment sessions (fractions) delivered to patients in a planning period with stochastic patient arrivals and penalize the deviation from the patient mix restrictions. We propose a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model that provides very useful insights in determining the best patient admission policies in the case of an unexpected opening in the facility (i.e., no-shows, appointment cancellations, etc.). In order to overcome the curse of dimensionality for larger and more realistic instances, we propose an aggregate MDP model that is able to approximate optimal patient admission policies using the worded weight aggregation technique. Our models are applicable to healthcare treatment facilities throughout the United States, but are motivated by collaboration with the University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute (UFPTI).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov decision process; Patient admission policy; Proton therapy; State aggregation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810359     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-016-9354-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  12 in total

1.  The relative costs of proton and X-ray radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Goitein; M Jermann
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  Technology evolution: is it survival of the fittest?

Authors:  Anthony Zietman; Michael Goitein; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Proton therapy expansion under current United States reimbursement models.

Authors:  John Kerstiens; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Ambulatory care and orthopaedic capacity planning.

Authors:  John Bowers; Gilliam Mould
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services.

Authors:  Tugba Cayirli; Emre Veral; Harry Rosen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-02

6.  Markov decision process applied to the control of hospital elective admissions.

Authors:  Luiz Guilherme Nadal Nunes; Solon Venâncio de Carvalho; Rita de Cássia Meneses Rodrigues
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  A Markov decision process approach to multi-category patient scheduling in a diagnostic facility.

Authors:  Yasin Gocgun; Brian W Bresnahan; Archis Ghate; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Does the dose fractionation schedule influence local control of adjuvant radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Y Yamada; I Ackerman; E Franssen; R G MacKenzie; G Thomas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A shorter fractionation schedule for postlumpectomy breast cancer patients.

Authors:  W Shelley; M Brundage; C Hayter; L Paszat; S Zhou; W Mackillop
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  A decomposition approach for the combined master surgical schedule and surgical case assignment problems.

Authors:  Alessandro Agnetis; Alberto Coppi; Matteo Corsini; Gabriella Dellino; Carlo Meloni; Marco Pranzo
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-06-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reduce Patient Treatment wait time in a Proton Beam Facility - A Gatekeeper Approach.

Authors:  Yu-Li Huang; Amanda J Deisher; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Patient Mix Optimization in Admission Planning under Multitype Patients and Priority Constraints.

Authors:  Jialing Li; Li Luo; Guiju Zhu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.238

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.