| Literature DB >> 26810307 |
Mónica S Ventura Ferreira1,2, Christian Bergmann3, Isabelle Bodensiek2, Kristina Peukert2, Jessica Abert3, Rafael Kramann4,5, Paul Kachel2, Björn Rath6, Stephan Rütten7, Ruth Knuchel2, Benjamin L Ebert8,9, Horst Fischer3, Tim H Brümmendorf1, Rebekka K Schneider10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone marrow (BM) niches are often inaccessible for controlled experimentation due to their difficult accessibility, biological complexity, and three-dimensional (3D) geometry.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26810307 PMCID: PMC4727380 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0234-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 17.388
Fig. 1Characterization of β-TCP scaffolds. a Negative mold used for wax casting during production of the different β-TCP scaffold geometries. b Macroscopic view of the β-TCP scaffolds. c SEM view of the β-TCP scaffolds. d Schematic illustration of the long-term cultures consisting of three main components: mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; pink), β-TCP (blue), and collagen I/III (green). e Table of porosites. f Cell morphology and cell spreading on scaffolds analyzed by SEM. g Release of calcium (Ca2+) and phosphate (PO4 3−) to the culture supernatant. Concentrations were measured in the supernatants of β-TCP cultures at days 3, 11, and 21 after the beginning of the culture. Concentrations were normalized to 1 at day 3 and are presented in mmol/L. Results depict mean ± SD of three independent experiments
Fig. 2Osteogenic marker and extracellular matrix expression analysis of long-term MSC cultures on β-TCP scaffolds. The osteogenic markers BMP-2, RUNX2, and OPN as well as the extracellular matrix proteins collagen I, fibronectin, collagen IV, and laminin were analyzed after 8 weeks in culture. Data were calibrated relative to MSCs growing in collagen I/III gels, where gene expression was set to 1 for all genes. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene for normalization. Gene expression is presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments and depicted on a logarithmic scale
Fig. 3Hematopoietic stem cell characterization in β-TCP scaffolds in vitro. C-kit+ cells were subjected to the different β-TCP/matrix hybrids over 14 days in vitro. a Percentage of DAPI−-viable cells after 14 days of c-kit+ cell culture with and without collagen I/III/Matrigel® on β-TCP scaffolds in the presence of MSC support. b Expansion/decrease of lin−Sca1+c-kit− stromal cells normalized to day 4 of the culture. c Expansion/decrease of lin− normalized to day 4 of the culture. Mean ± SD of three independent experiments. d Colony-forming potential of cells isolated from 500- and 800-μm β-TCP scaffolds with and without collagen I/III/Matrigel® in the presence of MSC support at day 4 and day 14. Results are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. CFU colony-forming unit, GEMM granulocyte-erythrocyte-macrophage-megakaryocyte, GM granulocyte-monocyte. without
Fig. 4Analysis of trilineage differentiation of c-kit+ HSPCs on β-TCP scaffolds in vitro. a Differentiation potential of c-kit+ cells cultured for 4 and 14 days on β-TCP scaffolds with and without collagen I/III gel/Matrigel® in the presence of MSC support: granulocytes (Gr1+CD11b+), monocytes (Gr1−CD11b), erythroid precursor cells (Gr1−CD11b−CD3−CD19−), and T cells (Gr1−CD11b−CD3+). Percentage of viable cells is shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. b SEM of c-kit+ cells cultured on 500-μm β-TCP/Matrigel® scaffolds. Very left column highlights cell spreading and detailed cell morphology of day 4 and day 14 cultures. C-kit+-derived cells (red arrows) are in close contact to MSCs (white arrows). Cell extensions at day 4 in detail (green arrow). View from the interior of the β-TCP macropores at day 14 (asterisk)
Fig. 5Histomorphology. 500μm or 800 μm β-TCP scaffolds were pre-seeded with mBMSC in the presence or absence of Matrigel®. Scaffolds were transplanted subcutaneously into C57B1/6 mice and analyzed for hematopoietic cell recruitment to sites of extramedullar hematopoiesis and hematopoietic tissue formation after 4 and 8 weeks. a Hematoxilin-eosin (HE) staining of the explanted scaffolds 8 weeks after transplantations. Magnification 100x. b Higher magnification of the explanted scaffolds after 8 weeks. Magnification 200x. c Immunohistochemistry for the endothelial surface marker CD31 and the pan-hematopoietic marker CD45 in explanted scaffolds 8 weeks after transplantation. d HE staining and by SEM for the identification of osteoclasts at the border of the β-TCP scaffold macropores in explants 4 weeks after transplantation
Fig. 6a SEM imaging of the explanted scaffolds 4 weeks after transplantation. White arrows: erythrocytes; black arrows: T cells; red arrows: thrombocytes; gray arrow: neutrophils/granulocytes; asterisk: β-TCP. b-c Gating strategy for the flow cytometry: Hematopoietic stem (LSK) and progenitor cells (LK) were identified by being negative for lineage markers and by the expression of Sca1 and c-kit. Lineages were identified by the following stainings: granulocytes (Gr1+CD11b+), monocytes (Gr1−CD11b−), erythroid precursor cells (Gr1−CD11b−CD3−CD19−), T cells (Gr1−CD11b−CD3+), B cells (Gr1−CD11b−CD19+). d Flow cytometry analysis of the explanted scaffolds 4 weeks after transplantations. Surface marker expression is shown as a percentage of the viable cell population; mean ± SD of three independent experiments