I Hassouna1,2, C Ott1, L Wüstefeld1, N Offen3, R A Neher4, M Mitkovski5, D Winkler1, S Sperling1, L Fries3, S Goebbels6, I C Vreja7,8, N Hagemeyer1, M Dittrich9, M F Rossetti1, K Kröhnert7, K Hannke1, S Boretius10, A Zeug11, C Höschen12, T Dandekar9, E Dere1, E Neher13,14, S O Rizzoli7,14, K-A Nave6,14, A-L Sirén3, H Ehrenreich1,14. 1. Clinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany. 2. On leave of absence from Physiology Unit, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Menoufia University, Al Minufya, Egypt. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Evolutionary Dynamics and Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany. 5. Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany. 6. Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany. 7. Department of Neuro- and Sensory Physiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. 8. International Max Planck Research School Molecular Biology, Göttingen, Germany. 9. Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 10. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany. 11. Cellular Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 12. Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Lehrstuhl für Bodenkunde, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. 13. Department of Membrane Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany. 14. DFG Center for Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain, Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) improves cognitive performance in neuropsychiatric diseases ranging from schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis to major depression and bipolar disease. This consistent EPO effect on cognition is independent of its role in hematopoiesis. The cellular mechanisms of action in brain, however, have remained unclear. Here we studied healthy young mice and observed that 3-week EPO administration was associated with an increased number of pyramidal neurons and oligodendrocytes in the hippocampus of ~20%. Under constant cognitive challenge, neuron numbers remained elevated until >6 months of age. Surprisingly, this increase occurred in absence of altered cell proliferation or apoptosis. After feeding a 15N-leucine diet, we used nanoscopic secondary ion mass spectrometry, and found that in EPO-treated mice, an equivalent number of neurons was defined by elevated 15N-leucine incorporation. In EPO-treated NG2-Cre-ERT2 mice, we confirmed enhanced differentiation of preexisting oligodendrocyte precursors in the absence of elevated DNA synthesis. A corresponding analysis of the neuronal lineage awaits the identification of suitable neuronal markers. In cultured neurospheres, EPO reduced Sox9 and stimulated miR124, associated with advanced neuronal differentiation. We are discussing a resulting working model in which EPO drives the differentiation of non-dividing precursors in both (NG2+) oligodendroglial and neuronal lineages. As endogenous EPO expression is induced by brain injury, such a mechanism of adult neurogenesis may be relevant for central nervous system regeneration.
Recombinant humanerythropoietin (EPO) improves cognitive performance in neuropsychiatric diseases ranging from schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis to major depression and bipolar disease. This consistent EPO effect on cognition is independent of its role in hematopoiesis. The cellular mechanisms of action in brain, however, have remained unclear. Here we studied healthy young mice and observed that 3-week EPO administration was associated with an increased number of pyramidal neurons and oligodendrocytes in the hippocampus of ~20%. Under constant cognitive challenge, neuron numbers remained elevated until >6 months of age. Surprisingly, this increase occurred in absence of altered cell proliferation or apoptosis. After feeding a 15N-leucine diet, we used nanoscopic secondary ion mass spectrometry, and found that in EPO-treated mice, an equivalent number of neurons was defined by elevated 15N-leucine incorporation. In EPO-treated NG2-Cre-ERT2mice, we confirmed enhanced differentiation of preexisting oligodendrocyte precursors in the absence of elevated DNA synthesis. A corresponding analysis of the neuronal lineage awaits the identification of suitable neuronal markers. In cultured neurospheres, EPO reduced Sox9 and stimulated miR124, associated with advanced neuronal differentiation. We are discussing a resulting working model in which EPO drives the differentiation of non-dividing precursors in both (NG2+) oligodendroglial and neuronal lineages. As endogenous EPO expression is induced by brain injury, such a mechanism of adult neurogenesis may be relevant for central nervous system regeneration.
Erythropoietin (EPO) and its receptor, EPOR, were originally named because of
their pivotal contribution to hematopoiesis, but over the last ~20 years, their
important role also in the nervous system became more and more
evident.[1, 2] EPO and EPOR expression in normal postnatal brain is
low[3] but distinct in areas like
hippocampus and cortex.[4, 5] Strong upregulation is observed upon distress, for
example, brain injury.[2, 6] In healthy rodents and man, recombinant humanEPO
improves cognition and increases hippocampal long-term
potentiation.[7, 8] Beneficial effects of EPO on cognitive performance
were consistently seen in clinical trials on schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis,
major depression or bipolar disease, for example, see refs 9. Importantly, these EPO actions on the brain are essentially
independent of hematopoiesis. There was either no increase in hematocrit or no
correlation between such increase and cognition in these clinical trials.
Moreover, the effect on cognition by far outlasted any transient effect on
hematocrit, for example, see refs 9. Even more
convincingly, non-hematopoietic EPO analogs[14] or the boosted cognition of mice with expression of
constitutively active EPOR in pyramidal neurons[15] are key arguments for brain effects of EPO in the
absence of any blood effects.Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of EPO action in brain have still remained
widely unclear. Some of the neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of EPO
in disease models were speculated to be associated with stimulation of
neurogenesis, for example, see refs 16, 17, 18, 19, but essentially no data are available to clearly
support this hypothesis or to discriminate between EPO effects on neural
progenitor proliferation versus differentiation in postnatal brain.[17] In the hematopoietic system, EPO is
crucial for antiapoptotic effects on erythroid precursors and for their
differentiation rather than for proliferation.[20] We therefore wondered whether similar mechanisms may
also apply for the nervous system.Adult neurogenesis has been discovered by labeling mitotic cells of the brain
with 5'-bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) or 3H-thymidine incorporation
into nuclear DNA. This led to the identification of restricted neurogenesis
areas in the adult brain, mainly dentate gyrus (DG) and subventricular zone
(SVZ).[21, 22, 23, 24, 25] For
oligodendrocytes, the situation is different, as adult precursor cells (OPC) are
widely distributed throughout the central nervous system.[26] Adult OPC are multipolar cells,
morphologically distinct from small and rapidly dividing progenitors in the SVZ
and molecularly defined by specific antigens, such as platelet-derived growth
factor receptor α (PDGFRα) and the proteoglycan NG2.[27, 28, 29, 30]Based on our findings of EPO enhancing cognition and long-term
potentiation,[7] and the popular
concept of neurogenesis leading to more neurons and more neurons to better
learning and memory,[22, 31, 32, 33] we initiated the present work. We report here the
surprising finding that (1) only 3-week administration of EPO to healthy young
mice is associated with an approximately 20% increase in the number of
mature neurons and oligodendrocytes in hippocampal cornu ammonis (CA1/CA3);
(2) under enduring cognitive challenge, these neuron numbers are preserved; (3)
this EPO effect involves stimulation of precursor differentiation rather than
proliferation or anti-apoptosis. We discuss a resulting working model, in which
these observations are—beyond EPO—compatible with a new aspect of
postnatal neurogenesis and neuroregeneration.
Materials and methods
Important note: All experiments in this article, including histological counting,
were performed by investigators unaware of (i) group assignment and (ii)
treatments ('fully blinded').
In vivo studies
An overview of in vivo studies performed is given in Figure 1a.
Figure 1
Erythropoietin (EPO) effects on neuron number, proliferation and apoptosis in
CA1 and CA3. All data are based on bilateral counting. (a)
Experimental design of the in vivo experiments (see f for
age at treatment in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) design). Mice
received EPO or placebo intraperitoneally (i.p.) every other day, starting
on postnatal day 28. (b) Number of pyramidal neurons in CA1 and CA3
at 1 week after 3-week EPO versus placebo treatment (w4) (analysis was
performed in two independent experiments with identical results;
n=17 in CA1 for both groups, and n=16 and
n=18 in CA3 for placebo and EPO, respectively).
(c) Sample cresyl violet staining, illustrating that pyramidal
neurons (arrowhead) can be clearly distinguished from other cells (arrow).
(d) Number of CTIP2+ pyramidal neurons in CA1 at w4
(n=4 per group). (e) Illustration of the CTIP2
staining in the dorsal hippocampus. The white rectangle indicates the
magnified area shown in the lower right corner. (f) MRI-based
volumetrical analysis of whole hippocampus (HC) after EPO or placebo
(n=6 per group; treatment in this set of male mice was
initiated at 11 weeks of age; that is, MRI data were obtained at age 15
weeks). (g) Proliferation determined by 5'-bromo-deoxyuridine
(BrdU) incorporation at w4 (placebo n=7 and EPO
n=6). (h) Apoptotic cells analyzed with terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (Tunel)
staining at w4 (n=10 for both groups). (i) Confocal
analysis of BrdU and NeuN double-positive cells at w4 (n=6
for both groups). (j) Confocal picture showing a neuron staining
positively for NeuN (green) and BrdU (red). (k and l) Number
of Pax6-positive cells at 72h and w1 (n=9 per group).
(m) Pax6+ cells (arrows) visualized by
3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. (n) Number of
doublecortin (Dcx)-positive cells at w4 (n=9 per group).
(o) Sample picture of Dcx+ cells. All bar graphs shown as
mean±s.e.m.; all analyses unpaired, two-tailed t-tests;
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***
P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.
Mice
All experiments were approved by and conducted in accordance with the
regulations of the local Animal Care and Use Committee
(Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und
Lebensmittelsicherheit—LAVES). Juvenile (28-day-old) male
C57BL/6 mice as well as NG2-Cre-ERT2:R26R-td-tomato-mEGFP[34, 35]
mice on C57BL/6 background were used in all experiments. They were
housed in groups of five in standard plastic cages and maintained in a
temperature-controlled environment (21±2 °C) on a
12 h light–dark cycle with food and water available ad
libitum. Mice were always randomly assigned to treatment groups.
Inclusion–exclusion criteria were pre-established. Included were only
male mice with same age and similar body weight. Exclusion criteria before
experiment start were impaired health or body weight lower than average. No
animals had to be excluded during any of the experiments. Criteria to
exclude mice from statistical analysis were determined by the Grubbs'
test using GraphPad Software (graphpad.com/quickcalcs). Genotyping of
Cre driver and reporter lines have been described.[34, 35] Detailed PCR
protocols are available on request.
EPO treatment
Male mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with recombinant humanEPO
(NeoRecormon, Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK,
5000 IU kg–1 body weight in
0.01 ml g–1) or placebo (solvent
solution, 0.01 ml g–1). Treatment was started
at the age of 28 days. Depending on the experiment, EPO was given once
(early time point of 6 h) or every other day (later time points of
72 h, 1 week or 3 weeks). BrdU was injected i.p. daily for 3 weeks
(5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridin, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany,
50 μg g–1 in 0.01ml
saline).[36] For induction
of Cre-activity in NG2-Cre-ERT2mice,
100 mg kg–1 tamoxifen (in cornoil;
Sigma-Aldrich) was injected i.p. at P26 and P27.
Male 4-week-old C57BL/6 mice received either EPO
(n=10) or placebo (n=11) i.p. every
other day over 3 weeks (11 injections in total). After the last
injection, the animals were adapted for 1 week to the food deprivation
procedure (85% of free feeding body weight) before start of the
touch-screen experiment.
Touch-screen-based operant system
Experimental procedures and visual stimuli were based on a previous
publication[37] with
slight modifications. The operant chamber (dimensions: 18.1 cm
× 17.6 cm × 18.6 cm), enclosed in a
sound and light attenuating box (Med Associates, St Albans, VT, USA),
contained a pellet dispenser, which delivered a single 14 mg
dustless pellet (TSE Systems, Bad Homburg, Germany) into a food tray
(magazine). A touch-sensitive TFT monitor (touch-screen; 18.4 cm
× 13.6 cm) was located on the opposite side of the chamber.
The touch-screen was divided into two parts, allowing two different
visual stimuli (of maximally 7.5 cm × 7.5 cm each)
to be presented simultaneously (Controller Software, K-Limbic,
Sawbridgeworth, UK).
Touch-screen experimental procedures
Mice were tested on 6 consecutive days per week. Every mouse underwent
the following sequence of test phases: (1) acclimation, (2) autoshaping,
(3) pre-training 1–3 and (4) visual discrimination. The daily
sessions were terminated after 30 min or when the mouse had
accomplished the specific learning criterion of the respective test
phase.Acclimation: Pellets were freely available in the magazine (prime reward)
with an inter-trial interval of 15 s. A new trial was initiated
after collection of the pellet leading to a disruption of an infrared
light beam. This test phase was completed after the animal had collected
10 pellets within 30 min.Autoshaping: The session started with a three pellets prime reward. After
the mouse had collected the pellets, two identical stimuli were
presented on both sides of the touch-screen for 10 s. The
disappearance of the stimuli coincided with a tone, illumination of the
pellet tray and the delivery of one pellet. A new trial was initiated
after collection of the pellet (inter-trial interval 15 s).
Animals that collected 30 pellets within 30 min moved on to the
pre-training phase.Pre-training 1: Again the session started with a three pellets prime
reward. After the mouse had collected the pellets, one stimulus was
presented pseudo-randomly on the left or right side of the touch-screen.
A touch response to the correct side where the stimulus was presented
activated the pellet dispenser to release a pellet into the magazine,
which was illuminated and signaled by a tone (inter-trial interval
5 s). This test phase was completed after the animal had
performed 30 correct responses within 30 min.Pre-training 2: This test phase was identical to pre-training 1 except
that the mouse had to actively initiate a new trial by disrupting the
infrared light beam in the magazine a second time (after it had
collected the food pellet). Only then the next stimulus could
appear.Pre-training 3: This test phase was identical to pre-training 2 except
that an incorrect response to the blank side of the touch-screen where
no stimulus was presented resulted in a 5 s timeout with house
light turned off and the initiation of a correction trial (maximum of
four possibilities to correct the faulty response) with the same
stimulus configuration presented. This test phase was completed after
the mouse had performed at least 27 correct responses out of 30
trials.Visual discrimination: This test phase was identical to pre-training 3
except that two different stimuli S+ and S– were presented
simultaneously and in a pseudorandom order on the left and right side of
the touch-screen. The selection of the stimulus S+ (correct
response) led to the disappearance of both stimuli, presentation of a
tone, illumination of the food magazine, delivery of a pellet. A new
trial could be initiated after the collection of the pellet and an
inter-trial interval of 5 s. The selection of the stimulus
S– (incorrect response) resulted in a 5 s timeout with
house light turned off and the initiation of a correction trial (maximum
of four possibilities to correct the faulty response) with the same
stimulus configuration presented. The test phase was completed if the
mouse accomplished 27 correct responses out of 30 trials or 26 correct
responses out of 30 trials on 2 consecutive days, whichever appeared
first (correction trials not counted). The experiment was concluded for
a given mouse after it had been tested for 61 days including all four
test phases.
Hippocampus volumetry using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Male mice at the age of 15 weeks (1 week after 3 weeks of EPO treatment, that
is, 4 weeks after EPO treatment start at 11 weeks of age) were anesthetized
with 1–1.5% isoflurane in a mixture of oxygen and ambient air
and positive ventilated via endotracheal tube. For in vivo
volumetry,[38]
three-dimensional fast low angle shot (FLASH;
TR/TE=14.9/3.9 ms) MRI was performed at 9.4T (Bruker
Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany) with an isotropic spatial resolution of
110 μm. Hippocampal volume was determined by manual segmentation
using the Amira software (Visage Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection with Avertin (Tribromoethanol,
Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MN, USA,
0.276 mg g–1) and perfused transcardially
with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains
were removed, postfixed overnight at 4 °C with 4% PFA and
placed in 30% sucrose/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for
cryoprotection and stored at -80 °C. Whole mouse brains were cut
into 30 μm thick coronal sections on a cryostat (Leica, Wetzlar,
Germany) and kept in a storage solution (25% ethylene glycol and
25% glycerol in PBS) at –20 °C.
Cresyl violet staining
Every 10th section was mounted on Super Frost microscopic slides (Gerhard
Menzel B.V. & Co. KG, Braunschweig, Germany), washed in PBS and
immersed for 25 min in dilute cresyl violet stain (0.01%)
in acetate buffer (pH 4.5). After dehydration in serial dilutions of
ethyl alcohol, sections were coverslipped using DePeX (Serva,
Heidelberg, Germany).
Pax6, Dcx, Olig1, PDGFRα, BrdU, Ki67 staining
Every 4th section for BrdU, every 8th for Ki67, every 10th section for
Dcx, PDGFRα and Olig1, and every 20th section for Pax6 were washed
three times with PBS and mounted on Super Frost microscopic slides. They
were dried overnight and rehydrated in PBS. Sections for Pax6, Dcx,
Ki67, PDGFRα and Olig1 were microwaved three times for
2 min in citrate buffer. For BrdU staining, sections were
pretreated with 1n HCl for 30 min at room temperature
(RT). All sections were incubated with 0.5% hydrogen peroxide for
30 min to quench endogenous peroxidases. Afterward, they were
permeabilized and blocked with 5% normal horse serum (NHS),
0.5% Triton-X in PBS for 1h at RT. The following primary
antibodies (final dilution and source) were used for tissue staining:
rabbit anti-Pax6 (1:200, Chemicon, Hampshire, UK), goat anti-Dcx (1:750,
Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Heidelberg, Germany), rabbit
anti-PDGFRα (1:2000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit
anti-Olig1 (1:100, Chemicon), mouse anti-BrdU (1:4000, Chemicon) and
rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:1000, Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle Upon Tyne,
UK). Antibodies were diluted in 3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X in
PBS. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with the respective
biotinylated secondary antibody for 1.5 h (1:200, Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The staining was visualized by a
peroxidase-labeled avidin-biotin kit (Vector Laboratories) and
3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were allowed to
dry overnight and coverslipped using DePeX (Serva).
TUNEL staining
To detect cells undergoing apoptosis, an in situ detection kit
(DeadEnd Colorimetric TUNEL Kit Promega, Mannheim, Germany) was used.
For terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end
labeling (TUNEL) staining, every 10th section was washed with PBS and
mounted on Super Frost microscopic slides. The staining was performed
according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Immunofluorescence double staining
For BrdU and NeuN, every 20th section was washed with PBS and incubated
with 1n HCL for 30 min at 45 °C in a
shaking water bath. Afterward, sections were permeabilized and blocked
with 5% NHS for 1h at RT. Sections were incubated with mouse
anti-NeuN (1:25, Chemicon) in 3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X in PBS
for 48 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, sections
were incubated with a fluorescently labeled secondary antibody (1:1000
goat anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 488; Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) for
1.5 h at RT. Sections were then washed and incubated with the
direct-labeled mouse anti-BrdUAlexa Fluor 594 (1:500, Invitrogen) in
3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X in PBS for 48 h at
4 °C. After washing in PBS, sections were mounted on Super
Frost microscopic slides, dried and coverslipped, using Vectashield
HardSet mounting medium containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI;
Vector Laboratories). For BrdU and Olig1, every 20th section was washed
with PBS and mounted on Super Frost microscopic slides. They were dried
overnight and rehydrated in PBS. Sections were pretreated with
1n HCl for 30min at RT. Sections were then boiled in
citrate buffer, permeabilized and blocked with 5% NHS for 1h at
RT. Sections were incubated with rabbit anti-Olig1 (1:25, Chemicon) and
mouse anti-BrdU (1:500, Chemicon) in 3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X
in PBS for 72 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS,
sections were incubated with a fluorescently labeled secondary antibody
(1:200 anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 568 Invitrogen,) and anti-rabbit
biotinylated (1:200, Vector Laboratories) for 1.5 h at RT. After
washing, sections were incubated with streptavidin Alexa 488 (1:200,
Invitrogen), washed in PBS and mounted. For green fluorescent protein
(GFP) and CC-1, every 10th section was washed with PBS and mounted on
Super Frost slides. They were allowed to dry overnight and rehydrated in
PBS. The sections were microwaved three times for 2 min in
citrate buffer, then permeabilized and blocked with 5% NHS,
0.5% Triton-X in PBS for 1 h at RT. The following primary
antibodies (final dilution and source) were used for tissue staining:
rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, SYSY, Göttingen, Germany), mouse anti-APC,
clone CC-1 (1:100, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Antibodies were diluted
in 3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X in PBS. After washing with PBS,
sections were incubated with horse anti-mouse biotinylated secondary
antibody for 1.5 h (1:200, Vector Laboratories). Staining was
visualized by goat anti-rabbit-Cy2 secondary antibody (1:250, Dianova,
Hamburg, Germany) and streptavidin conjugated to Alexa633 (1:250, Life
Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). After washing, sections were
incubated with DAPI in PBS
(0.125 μg ml–1, 406 nm;
Sigma-Aldrich), dried overnight and coverslipped by Aqua Poly/Mount
(Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). For EPOR/GFP double labeling
and CTIP2 stainings, sections (for CTIP2 every 10th) were washed with
PBS and then permeabilized/blocked with 5% NHS, 0.5%
Triton-X in PBS for 1 h at RT on a shaker. As primary antibodies,
goat anti-GFP (1:500, Rockland, Limerick, PA, USA), rabbit
anti-EPOR[6] and guinea
pig anti-CTIP2 (both 1:300, SYSY) were used. Antibodies were diluted in
3% NHS, 0.5% Triton-X in PBS and sections incubated with
primary antibodies for 72 h at 4 °C on a shaker. After
washing with PBS, sections were incubated with fluorescently labeled
secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goatAlexa Fluor 488 and donkey
anti-rabbitAlexa Fluor 594, both 1:250, Life Technologies, or donkey
anti-guinea-pig-Cy3, 1:300, Dianova) for 1.5 h at RT on a shaker.
After washing, sections were incubated with DAPI in ddH2O
(0.125 μg ml–1, 406 nm;
Sigma-Aldrich), dried overnight and coverslipped by Aqua Poly/Mount
(Polysciences).
Histological cell counting
Stereological counting of cresyl violet, Dcx, Ki67, PDGFRα,
Olig1, BrdU and Tunel-positive cells
Serial coronal sections, spaced at regular intervals for the specific
marker under investigation, were taken through the dorsal hippocampus
(coordinates from Bregma: −1.34 to −2.54 mm
posterior) and the SVZ (coordinates from Bregma: 1.18 to
−0.1 mm) for quantitative analysis. Stereological
determination of the cell number was carried out using the optical
fractionator technique (Stereo Investigator, MicroBrightfield,
Magdeburg, Germany). Cells were counted using a light microscope
(Olympus BX-50, Tokyo, Japan) modified for stereology with 40x and 100x
oil immersion objectives, a computer-driven motorized stage, z axis
position encoder (microcator), and a microfire video camera interfaced
to a PC with the software Stereo Investigator 6.55 (MicroBrightfield,
Inc., Williston, VT, USA). Cell numbers were estimated using the
modified optical fractionator technique.[39] All stereological analyses for cell counting
were performed on both sides of the hippocampus and SVZ. Hippocampus
CA2/CA3 region is referred to as CA3 in text and figures. Neurons
were counted only in the pyramidal layers of CA1 and CA3 regions
(Supplementary Figure 1 and
Supplementary Table 1). From area
determination of hippocampal subfields, it was estimated that systematic
uniform spacing of random sampling site (SURS grid size, x- and y-steps)
of 80 × 80 μm would provide >10.000 sampling sites if
all sections were analyzed. Accordingly, the x and y dimensions of the
counting frame was defined to be 20 × 20 μm, giving an
average number of particles counted per optical dissector (with a height
of 20 μm and a guard zone of 2 μm from top and
bottom) of about 1–2. The estimated total number of neurons in CA1
or CA3 was thus the sum of the counted particles multiplied by the
fraction factors 1/ssf, 1/asf and 1/hsf (ssf=section
sampling fraction, asf=area sampling fraction,
tsf=thickness sampling fraction; Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Optimizing the sampling scheme
to counting more neurons yielded more precision and a lower coefficient
of error.[39] For all markers
counted, the same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The
stereological sampling scheme was considered adequate when coefficient
of error was <0.10.[40] As
this was not the case for Pax6+ cells, because of the relatively
low numbers, conventional counting was applied. Pax6+ cells were
counted in CA1 and CA3 regions on serial coronal sections through the
dorsal hippocampus, using a light microscope (Zeiss Axiostar Plus, Jena,
Germany) with 20x and 40x objectives. The counts represent the mean of
CA1 or CA3 counts from four sections per animal.
Confocal counting of BrdU+/NeuN+,
BrdU+/Olig1+, GFP+/CC-1+ and CTIP2+
cells
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica TCS SP2-AOBS for
BrdU+/NeuN+, BrdU+/Olig1+ and Leica TCS
SP5-II for GFP+/CC-1+ and CTIP2+) was used to count
fluorescently double-labeled cells in anatomically matched sections.
Every 10th section obtained from the dorsal part of hippocampus (Bregma
–1.34 to –2.54 mm posterior) was analyzed bilaterally
in each animal. All BrdU-positive cells in hippocampal formations (DG,
CA1 and CA3) were examined for either NeuN or Olig1 co-labeling, the
markers for mature neurons and oligodendrocytes respectively.
Colocalization was confirmed with a z-stack of the respective cell soma,
which was acquired with a line-based sequential scan using
3 μm intervals. The immunofluorescent double-labeled cells
were verified using oil immersion 63x objective lens. The volume of
hippocampal regions was determined for each section using
Cavalieri's principle.[39]
Cell density was obtained by dividing the number of double-labeled cells
(BrdU+/NeuN+ or BrdU+/Olig1+) per animal by
the total volume of hippocampal region in mm3. All GFP+
cells and CTIP2+ in all hippocampus sections were examined for
double labeling with CC-1 and DAPI or CTIP2 and DAPI, respectively.
Colocalization was confirmed with a z-stack of whole hippocampus
sections, which was acquired with a line-based sequential scan, using
0.25-μm intervals and a 20 × glycerol objective. Stacks were
further processed by Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). The final quantification
of GFP+/DAPI+, CC-1+/DAPI+,
GFP+/CC-1+/DAPI+ and CTIP2+/DAPI+
cells was done using Imaris 7.5.1 (www.bitplane.com).
NanoSIMS experiment
Beginning on postnatal day 28, mice received freely available food pellets
containing 1.025% l-Leucine-15N stable isotope
(Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany). On day 28, EPO or placebo treatment
was started according to our standard protocol, with injections every other
day for 3 weeks. During this treatment, animals received drinking water
containing 0.2 mg ml–1
5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU, Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA).
EPO/placebo treatment, EdU and l-Leucine-15N
feeding were stopped simultaneously. One week later, mice were anesthetized
by i.p. injection with Avertin (Tribromoethanol, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis,
MN, USA, 0.276 mg g–1) and perfused
transcardially with 0.9% saline followed by 4% PFA. Brains
were removed, postfixed overnight at 4 °C with 4% PFA and
placed in 30% sucrose/PBS for cryoprotection and stored at
−80 °C. Whole mouse brains were cut into 30 μm
thick coronal sections on a cryostat (Leica) and kept in a storage solution
(25% ethylene glycol and 25% glycerol in PBS) at
−20 °C. Slices of the dorsal hippocampus were immunostained
for NeuN to identify neuronal cell bodies. Furthermore, EdU detection was
accomplished with a Click-iT EdUAlexa Fluorophore 647 Imaging Kit (Life
Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA) to label cells proliferating during the
EPO/placebo treatment. In brief, after blocking in 5% NHS,
sections were incubated with mouse anti-NeuN (1:500, Chemicon) for
48 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, sections were
incubated with a Cy3-labeled secondary antibody (1:100 goat anti-mouse,
Dianova) for 1.5 h at RT. Sections were washed, permeabilized again
and incubated with Click-iT reaction mix according to the
manufacturer's instruction. The slices were embedded in LR White resin
as previously described,[41] and
regions from the CA1 pyramidal layer area were excised and processed to
500 nm thick sections using a Leica UC6 microtome (Leica). The
sections were put on silicon wafers, and first imaged by fluorescence
microscopy, to identify the NeuN-labeled areas. Fiducial markers were
imprinted on the sections using a two-photon laser at 100% power
output, to enable the identification of the same areas in the nanoscopic
secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) instrument. Fluorescence imaging
was performed using a TCS STED microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar,
Germany), as described.[41] Only
areas that did not contain any EdU staining were used, to exclude the
analysis of dividing cells. The silicon wafers were then mounted in a
NanoSIMS 50L device (Cameca, Gennevilliers, France), and were scanned using
Cs+ primary beam. Secondary ions, including
12C14N- and 12C15N-, were
detected by mass separation, using a double focalization mass spectrometer
(based on 'Mattauch-Herzog' geometry). Areas of 39 by
39 μm were imaged, onto 256 × 256 pixel rasters, using a
10 ms pixel dwell-time. Several planes (10–40) were acquired
repeatedly, and were assembled into average images using a self-written
routine in Matlab (The Mathworks, Ismaning, Germany). For simplicity, the
12C14N- and 12C15N- ionic
species are referred to as 14N and 15N throughout the
work.
In vitro studies
Design overviews of in vitro studies are given in Supplementary Figures 4A, C and 5A.
Randomization and exclusion criteria
Samples/dishes per wells were randomly assigned to treatment groups.
Exclusion criteria for all experiments were pre-established. Criteria to
exclude cultures from statistical analysis were determined by the
Grubbs' test using GraphPad Software (graphpad.com/quickcalcs).
Neural stem cell (NSC) isolation and culture
NSC were isolated from embryonic mice on day 14 (E14) as described
previously[42] with minor
modifications. Whole mouse brains were mechanically dissociated and cultured
in NSC medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 with
15 mM heparin, 2 mM
l-glutamine, 2% B27, 0.22% sodium bicarbonate; all
from Invitrogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PAA, Cölbe,
Germany), 0.6% glucose (Sigma-Aldrich), and supplemented with
20 ng ml–1 humanepidermal growth factor
and 20 ng ml–1 human basic fibroblast growth
factor-2 (both from Peprotech, Hamburg, Germany). NSC were cultured at
37 °C under 5% CO2/95% air and
90% humidity. Medium was replaced every third day. NSC-generated
neurospheres were passaged every fifth day according to the following
protocol: neurospheres were first incubated in AccuMax (PAA, Hamburg,
Germany) for 4 min at 37 °C and mechanically triturated
with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette. New NSC cultures were prepared at a
density of 40 cells μl–1 in NSC medium and
supplemented with 20 ng ml–1 human epidermal
growth factor and 20 ng ml–1 human basic
fibroblast growth factor-2. Tertiary neurospheres were used for all
experiments.
Neurosphere growth assay
Tertiary neurospheres were dissociated into single cells and seeded with a
density of 800 cells per well into 96-well suspension culture plates
(Greiner bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany), containing 200 μl of
NSC medium supplemented with 5 ng ml–1 humanepidermal growth factor and 5 ng ml–1 human
basic fibroblast growth factor-2. Cells were immediately treated either with
1IU ml–1 EPO or solvent control, both diluted
with PBS, and cultured for 144 h at 37 °C under 5%
CO2/95% air and 90% humidity without
changing the medium. After 144 h, all wells were analyzed for
neurosphere growth: total number of neurospheres per well was counted for
each well and every neurosphere was photographed using an Olympus IX70
inverse microscope (Olympus, Münster, Germany) and the AnalySIS
software (Soft Imaging System GmbH, Münster, Germany). Sphere diameter
was measured using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
NSC cell death assay, TuJ1 and GFAP staining
For the NSC cell death assay, tertiary neurospheres were dissociated into
single cells as described above and plated at a density of 25 000
cells on poly-d-lysine (PDL) (Sigma-Aldrich) coated glass
coverslips (Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Lauda-Königshofen,
Germany) in four-well plates (Nunc/Thermo Scientific, Langenselbold,
Germany). NSC were cultured in minimum essential medium, supplemented with
2% B27, 0.22% sodium bicarbonate, 1% sodium pyruvate
(all from Invitrogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin,
2 mM
l-glutamine (PAA, Cölbe, Germany) and 0.6% glucose
(Sigma-Aldrich). Cultures received 1IU ml–1 EPO or
solvent control, both diluted with PBS, for 24 h at 37 °C
under 5% CO2/95% air and 90% humidity.
After 24 h, NSC cultures were treated with Trypan blue
(Sigma-Aldrich) and vital and dead cells were counted for five randomly
chosen fields on each coverslip. For each NSC culture and condition, five
coverslips were analyzed. For TuJ1 and GFAP staining, NSC were
differentiated in minimum essential medium on PDL-coated glass coverslips in
24-well plates (Greiner bio-one) in the presence of
1 IU ml–1 EPO or solvent control. Cells
were seeded with a density of 50 000 cells per coverslip. After
96 h, cells were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich) and
stained with a mouse-anti-TuJ1 (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich) or mouse-anti-GFAP
(1:1000, Novocastra, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) primary and a goat
anti-mouse-Cy3 secondary antibody (1:1000, Dianova). In addition, cell
nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. For each NSC culture and staining,
photos from eight coverslips (six randomly chosen fields per coverslip) were
taken using an Axiophot 2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany)
with a Spot Insight camera (Visitron Systems, Puchheim, Germany). From each
photo taken, the number of living and dead (DAPI) as well as TuJ1 or
GFAP-positive cells were counted.
Knock-down of miR124
Tertiary neurospheres were dissociated into single cells as described above.
NSC were transfected with either the FAM-labeled miRCURY LNA miR124
inhibitor or the FAM-labeled miRCURY LNA control oligonucleotide (Exiqon,
Skelstedet, Denmark) using the Amaxa mouse neural stem cell nucleofector kit
(Lonza, Cologne, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Both LNA oligonucleotides were used at a concentration of
60 mM. A neurosphere growth assay was performed
96 h after transfection as described above with the following change:
2000 transfected cells per well were plated to compensate for the increased
cell death because of the transfection procedure. Cells were treated with
1 IU ml–1 EPO or solvent control (six
replicates per condition).
Hippocampal cultures from mice at embryonic day 17 (E17) were prepared as
described previously.[7] The removal
of the meninges and dissection of the hippocampi was done in Hank's
balanced salt solution (Invitrogen) supplemented with
penicillin/streptomycin (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria) and
HEPES (Invitrogen). The hippocampi were trypsinized and mechanically
triturated with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Cells were seeded on
PDL-coated six-well plates for RNA isolation with a density of
170 000 cells per well. For immunocytochemistry, 25 000 cells
were seeded on PDL-coated coverslips. Neurons were cultured in minimum
essential medium/B27 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with sodium
bicarbonate, sodium pyruvate, l-glutamine, penicillin,
streptomycin and 0.6% glucose. Cultures were incubated at
37 °C under 7.5% CO2/92.5% air and
90% humidity. To analyze the basal EPOR expression, total RNA was
isolated 0.3 h and 24h after seeding. In all other experiments, cells
were treated with 0.3 IU ml–1 EPO or solvent
control 0.3 h after seeding. This time point is declared as time
point 0. RNA was isolated at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after
treatment. The immunocytochemical analysis was performed after 6 h,
12 h, 24 h, and at day 8 (d8).
Immunocytochemistry
After 6, 12 and 24 h in culture, cells grown on coverslips were
stained for Dcx or GFAP to analyze the culture composition and
double-stained for Dcx and MAP2 to determine the differentiation ratio.
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min,
permeabilized and blocked in 0.2% Triton-X-100 with 10% NHS in
PBS for 20 min. Cells were incubated with goat anti-Dcx (1:200, Santa
Cruz Biotechnologies) or mouse anti-GFAP (1:500, Novocastra, Newcastle Upon
Tyne, UK) in 0.02% Triton-X-100 with 1% NHS at 4 °C
overnight, followed by the rabbit anti-goat-Cy2 secondary antibody or goat
anti-mouse-Cy2 secondary antibody (1:1000, Dianova) at RT. Afterward,
coverslips were dried and mounted with fluorescence mounting medium (Vector
Laboratories) containing DAPI. For double staining, goat anti-Dcx (1:1000,
Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) and primary labeled mouse anti-MAP2 Alexa Fluor
488 antibody (1:2000, Chemicon) were used to colocalize Dcx with MAP2
expression. At d8, neurons were quadruple stained for Dcx, MAP2, SynI and
SytI. Cells were first stimulated for 10 s with high
K+-base solution (70 mM KCl,
140 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES,
10 mM glucose, 4 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM CaCl2) in presence of
rabbit anti-synaptotagminluminal (1:50, SYSY) and then
transferred into low K+-base solution
(2.4 mM KCl) in presence of the same antibody for
30 s at 37 °C. After 2-min washing, cells were fixed with
3% paraformaldehyde and 2% acrolein in PBS for 20 min
at RT. Cells were permeabilized and blocked in 0.2% Triton-X-100 with
10% NHS in PBS for 20 min and incubated with goat anti-Dcx
(1:4000, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) and mouse anti-synapsin I (1:4000,
SYSY) at 4 °C overnight. The next day, cells were incubated with
fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (1:1000 Alexa Fluor 546donkey
anti-mouse, 1:500 Alexa Fluor 594donkey anti-rabbit, 1:1000 Alexa Fluor 633donkey anti-goat; Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT. Finally, cells were
incubated with primary labeled mouse anti-MAP2Alexa Fluor 488 antibody
(1:2000, Chemicon) at 4 °C overnight. Before mounting with Aqua
Poly/Mount (Polysciences), cells were stained with DAPI
(0.125 μg ml–1, 406 nm;
Sigma-Aldrich).
Fluorescent microscopy counting
For analyzing cell number and cell death, the DAPI-stained cells were counted
by using upright light microscope (Axiophot, Zeiss) in two categories. Cells
with homogenous oval nuclei were counted representing normal living cells.
Cells showing a condensed chromatin formation or fragmented nuclear bodies
were considered as apoptotic cells. The number of apoptotic cells is divided
by the total number of DAPI-positive cells to obtain the percentage of cell
death. To estimate culture composition, four visual fields of Dcx+ or
GFAP+ cells were counted and normalized to DAPI.
Confocal microscopy and analysis
Images were obtained using an inverted confocal laser scanning microscope
(Leica TCS SP2-AOBS; Mannheim, Germany) equipped with an UV-diode
(405 nm), argon (458, 476, 488, 514 nm), DPSS (561 nm)
and 2 He–Ne laser (594, 633 nm). Pictures were taken with a 63x
Plan-Apo, 1.4NA oil immersion objective.
Double stain
Images for 6, 12 and 24 h were taken with a line average of 4.
Acquisition settings were held constant across recordings within each
experiment. For the intensity-based comparison of Dcx and MAP2, the free
available software Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji) was used. Briefly, the 8-bit
pictures were converted into 32-bit pictures, a Gaussian filter with
sigma=232 nm was applied, the background was subtracted,
the lower threshold was set to 7 and the upper threshold was set to 250.
Integrated density of Dcx and MAP2 was measured and ratio taken.
Quadruple stain
Using sequential image recording with fixed emission windows and applying
a blind source separation technique, we unmixed the fluorescence
contributions of four different fluorescent dyes (Dcx-Alexa Fluor 633,
MAP2Alexa Fluor 488, SytI-Alexa Fluor 594, SynI-Alexa Fluor 546).
Twelve-bit images for d8 were taken with a zoom factor 2.5, line average
4 and an accumulation of three scans. Detector gain of 500 was used for
all photomultiplier tubes, offset and laser intensity percentages were
held constant across images within each experiment. The choice of
fluorochromes and emission windows (Figure 6a) was optimized for the
subsequent nonnegative tensor factorization decomposition, which further
took available lasers of our imaging setup into account. Images were
acquired sequentially, whereas emission windows were kept fixed. The
images were spectrally decomposed using the nonnegative tensor
factorization algorithm described previously[43] with minor modifications. The nonnegative
tensor factorization algorithm was initialized with spectra as
determined by single stained samples. The spectrum of Alexa Fluor 633
(Dcx) was kept fixed during the decomposition. The nonnegative tensor
factorization algorithm was coded in Python; the source code is
available on request. Further data processing was also done with custom
written Python scripts. Using the unmixed images, we determined the
total fluorescence intensity of Dcx and MAP2 in the area above a
threshold (250 in units of photomultiplier count). To detect synaptic
buttons in SynI and SytI stains, we applied a custom-made feature
detection algorithm to the images. Images where smoothed using a
Gaussian filter with sigma=186nm, Laplace filtered and
thresholded to isolate small maxima in fluorescence intensity
corresponding to synaptic buttons. To increase the signal to noise
ratio, we considered only buttons that have integrated fluorescence
intensity >7000. Having detected the putative synaptic buttons, we
investigated the morphology of the buttons positive for SynI, SytI, and
those buttons positive for both SynI and SytI. Analysis scripts are
available on request.
Protein extraction
Tissues
Protein extraction and analysis was done as described
previously.[44] Mice
were decapitated; the hippocampi were taken out, immediately frozen on
dry ice and stored at –80°C. For the analysis of myelin and
control proteins, samples were homogenized in lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.3), 150 mM
NaCl, 40 mM NaF, 5 mM EDTA,
5 mM EGTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 1% Igepal, 0.1% sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) also containing
1 mM phenylmethysulfonylfluoride,
10 μg ml–1 aprotinin and
10 μg ml–1 leupeptin. The tissue
lysates were freeze-thawed four times and homogenized by pulling through
a 1 ml syringe 10 times and centrifuged at
12 000 r.p.m. for 45 min. To estimate the
phosphorylation of pMAPK/MAPK, total protein was extracted from
cultures by using PhosphoSafe (Merck) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
Neurosphere suspension cultures
Tertiary neurospheres were dissociated into single cells as described
before and suspension cultures were prepared with a density of
40 000 cells per suspension culture flask. NSC were cultured
24 h in NSC medium supplemented with
5 ng ml–1 human epidermal growth
factor and human basic fibroblast growth factor-2 at 37 °C
under 5% CO2/95% air and 90%
humidity. After 24 h, 1 IU ml–1
EPO or PBS was added to the suspension culture and total cell protein
was isolated 10 min after treatment.
Neurosphere differentiation cultures
Single NSC were plated on six-well plates (Nunc/Thermo Scientific),
coated with PDL at a density of 170 000 cells per well in minimum
essential medium. NSC were allowed to adhere to the surface for
0.3 h before 1 IU ml–1 EPO or PBS
was added and total cell protein was isolated after 10 min.
E17 hippocampal neuronal cultures
Cells were seeded on PDL-coated six-well plates with a density of
170 000 cells per well. Cells were treated with
0.3 IU ml–1 EPO or placebo at
0.3 h or 24 h after seeding and protein was isolated after
10min.
Immunoblot analysis
Supernatant from cells or tissue (10 μl) were used for
determination of total protein by the Lowry method. The remaining
supernatant was mixed with three volumes of Laemmli buffer
(250 mM Tris HCL (pH 8.3), 8% sodium dodecyl
sulfate, 40% glycerol, 20% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.04%
pyronin Y) boiled for 5–10min at 95°C and frozen at
−80 °C until blotting. In all, 10–20 μg
protein were run on NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen) for 1h at
180 V and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane for 90 min
at 30 V. After blocking with 5% milk in Tween20-Tris-buffered
saline at RT for 1h, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies: mouse
anti-pMAPK, rabbit anti-MAPK, mouse anti-CNPase (all 1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich),
rabbit anti-MBP (1:5000, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and mouse anti-GAPDH
(1:5000, Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), rabbit anti-TOM20 (1:2000,
Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), mouse anti-GAD67 (1:5000, SYSY), mouse
anti-Grp75 (1:2000, Assay Designs), rabbit anti-TrkB (1:200, Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA), rabbit anti-Sox9 (1:2000, Millipore,
Billerica, MA, USA), rabbit anti-actin (1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich).
Immunoreactive bands were visualized by using secondary antibodies coupled
to horseradish peroxidise (1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich) by enhanced
chemiluminescence (Immobilon Western, Millipore). Densitometrical analysis
of protein bands was performed using ImageJ software. Proteins were either
normalized to GAPDH (CNPase, MBP, TOM20, GAD67, Grp75, TrkB) or actin
(Sox9).
Isolation of total RNA and quantitative real-time RT-PCR
(qPCR)
Tissue or cells were homogenized in Trizol or Quiazol. Total RNA was isolated
by using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
mRNA
First-strand complementary DNA was generated from total RNA using N9
random and Oligo(dT) 18 primers. The relative concentrations of mRNAs of
interest in different complementary DNA samples were measured out of
three replicates using the threshold cycle method (delta Ct) for each
dilution and were normalized to levels of beta-actin RNA. Reactions were
performed using SYBR green PCR master mix (ABgene, Foster City, CA, USA)
according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Cycling was done for
2 min at 50 °C, followed by denaturation at
95 °C for 10 min. The amplification was carried out by
45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for
60 s. The specificity of each primer pair was controlled with a
melting curve analysis. For qPCR, we used the following primers: mouse
Dcx (NM_001110222.1) fwd:
5′-CCTTGGATGAGAATGAATGC-3′, rev:
5′-TGAGTCAGCTGGAGACTTGC-3′ mouseEPOR
(NM_010149.2) fwd:
5′-CCTCATCTCGTTGTTGCTGA-3′, rev:
5′-CAGGCCAGATCTTCTGCTG-3′ mouseGFAP
(NM_010277.2) fwd:
5′-ACAGACTTTCTCCAACCTCCAG-3′, rev:
5′-CCTTCTGACACGGATTTGGT-3′ mouseMAP2
(NM_ 001039934) fwd:
5′-AAGCACTGATTGGGAAGCACTC-3′, rev:
5′-CGTCGGCCATCTTTCAGATCTC-3′ mouseND1 (NM_010894) fwd
5′-CGCAGAAGGCAAGGTGTC-3′, rev
5′-TTTGGTCATGTTTCCACTTCC-3′ mouseS100B (NM_009115) fwd:
5′-AACAACGAGCTCTCTCACTTCC-3′, rev:
5′-CTCCATCACTTTGTCCACCA-3′ mouseSox9
(NM_011448.3) fwd:
5′-CAAGCGGAGGCCGAAGA-3′, rev:
5′-CAGCTTGCACGTCGGTTT-3′, mousebeta-actin (NM_007393.3) fwd:
5′-CTTCCTCCCTGGAGAAGAGC-3′, rev:
5′-ATGCCACAGGATTCCATACC-3′.
miR124
First-strand complementary DNA synthesis and reactions were generated
from total RNA using the TaqMan MicroRNA RT Kit, TaqMan MicroRNA Assay
for hsa-miR124, TaqMan MicroRNA Assay for sno-RNA142 as a housekeeper
and TaqMan 2x Universal PCR Master Mix (ABgene) according to the
protocol of the manufacturer. Cycling was done with 10-min denaturation
at 95 °C and amplification for 40 cycles at 95 °C
for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s.
Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. All data sets were normally
distributed as ascertained with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student's
t-tests for all in vivo and in vitro data.
One-tailed Student's t-tests (stated in the Supplementary Figure legend) were performed
whenever experiments were confirmatory or clearly hypothesis driven.
Variances were overall similar between compared groups. Touch-screen visual
discrimination data were analyzed by means of Kaplan–Meier survival
analysis and log ranked Mantel–Cox test. Data plotting and statistical
analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA,
USA). Statistical differences were considered to be significant when
P<0.05 (*P<0.05,
**P<0.01, ***P<0.001,
****P<0.0001). Sample size estimates were
based on extensive experience with similar experiments; expected effect
sizes (Cohen's d see, for example, Cohen[45]) were according to these previous data strong (d
> 1; see for example, Sargin et al.[44]). Considering all the data, we furthermore
performed power analyses to show adequate sample size according to the
observed effect sizes of the experiments (software G*Power Version
3.1.7, Düsseldorf, Germany). The adequate power (1–β-error)
was defined as ≥ 80% and the α-error as 5%. Overall,
adequate sample sizes led to observed effect sizes (1.23–6.90)
agreeing with the estimates from previous experiments (strong; d >1).
Examples of key experiments: analysis of pyramidal neurons in CA1 in the
first cohort of mice (Figure 1b; observed effect
size d=1.97). Analysis of pyramidal neurons in the first cohort of
mice in CA3 (Figure 1b; observed d=1.23).
Analysis of the coefficient of variation of the
15N/14N ratio in the neuronal nuclei in CA1
(Figure 3l; observed d=6.90). Analysis of MBP expression in the
hippocampus (Figures 2c and d; observed
d=1.45). Analysis of the percentage of CC-1+/GFP+
within the pool of GFP+ cells in the hippocampus of
NG2-Cre-ERT2:R26R-td-tomato-mEGFP mice (Figure
2l; observed d=1.86).
Figure 2
Erythropoietin (EPO) effects on oligodendrocytes and myelination. All data
are based on bilateral counting. (a) Number of mature
oligodendrocytes with cytoplasmic Olig1 expression in CA1 and CA3 at w4
(placebo n=8 and EPO n=10). (b)
Olig1+ cells visualized by 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining.
(c) Densitometrical quantification of myelin proteins
(housekeeping gene GAPDH) extracted from hippocampal tissue
(n=10 for all proteins and groups except n=8
for placebo of MBP and CNPase). (d) Sample western blots. (e)
Number of 5'-bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and cytoplasmic Olig1
double-positive cells in CA1 and CA3 at w4 (n=5 for both
groups). (f) Illustration of BrdU and Olig1 colocalization.
(g) Number of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α+
(PDGFRα+) OPC at 72 h after start of EPO/placebo
treatment (n=10 for both groups). (h)
PDGFRα+ cells visualized by DAB staining. (i) Number of
PDGFRα+ OPC at w4 after start of EPO/placebo treatment
(placebo n=8 and EPO n=10). (j) Left
hippocampus of NG2-Cre-ERT2:R26R-td-tomato-mEGFP mice at w4 (postnatal day
56), stained for CC-1, green fluorescent protein (GFP) and
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); CC, corpus callosum; PL, pyramidal
layer. (k) Magnification of the white square area denoted in
j, showing a CC-1+/GFP+/DAPI+ cell in all 3
dimensions (xy, xz and yz). (l) CC-1+/GFP+ cells
expressed as percentage of total NG2 (GFP+) cells at w4
(n=5 for both groups). (m) CC-1+ cells at w4
(n=5 for both groups). (n) Hippocampus of
NG2-Cre-ERT2:R26R-td-tomato-mEGFP mice at postnatal day 31, showing
co-labeling for NG2 and EPOR. HC, total hippocampus; All bar graphs shown as
mean±s.e.m.; all analyses unpaired, two-tailed t-tests,
except for subpanel m one-tailed t-test;
*P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001.
Results
EPO administration to young mice increases neuron numbers in CA1 and
CA3
We applied our EPO treatment protocol known to increase long-term
potentiation and to improve memory[7]
(experimental design; Figure 1a). Stereological
quantification of pyramidal neurons bilaterally in CA1/CA3 of 8-week-old
mice, that is, 1 week after 3 weeks of EPO
(5000 IU kg–1 every other day) or placebo
injections, revealed a ~20% increase in mature neurons upon EPO
(Figures 1b and c; Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary
Table 1). This increase was determined in two independent
experiments on different mouse cohorts. To confirm the augmented pyramidal
neuron numbers, we additionally performed anti-CTIP2 staining. CTIP2 is a
transcriptional regulatory protein[46] that specifically labels pyramidal neurons in CA1.
Indeed, the number of CTIP2+ cells in CA1 of the EPO-treated group was
~22% higher compared with the placebo group (Figures 1d and e). Importantly, this increase is also
reflected by a larger hippocampal volume in MRI in 15-week-old mice where
treatment was started at 11 (instead of 4) weeks of age (Figure 1f). Total brain volume and body weight of EPO-treated
mice did not differ from placebo (data not shown).
Higher neuron numbers upon EPO are not explained by increased
proliferation or decreased apoptosis
To elucidate the elevated neuron numbers upon EPO in CA1/CA3, we searched
for evidence of increased proliferation or reduced apoptosis. Surprisingly,
we observed the opposite: BrdU+ cells were diminished (Figure 1g) and apoptotic cells raised (Figure 1h). Double staining with BrdU and NeuN, a
marker of mature neurons, showed comparable numbers in EPO and placebo mice
(Figures 1i and j). At earlier time points,
for example, at 1 week of EPO treatment, neither proliferation nor apoptosis
were altered (data not shown). In addition, staining for the cell cycle
marker Ki67 in whole hippocampus at 1 week of EPO/placebo injections did
not reveal any differences in Ki67+ cells between treatment groups
(224±34 versus 221±25; P=0.96), supporting
that there is no increased DNA replication in this brain region upon EPO
administration.
Reduction of neuronal precursor cells as an early response to
EPO
The considerable increase in neurons upon EPO could be due to an accelerated
differentiation of neuronal progenitors. In that case, staining for immature
markers would yield a respective reduction in number already at early time
points. Indeed, cells stained for the transcription factor Pax6 were
decreased in CA1/CA3 at 72 h after EPO treatment initiation
(Figures 1k–m). Also, the reduction
under EPO of doublecortin-positive (Dcx+), that is, still immature
neurons, significant in CA3 at 4 weeks, is compatible with accelerated
differentiation (Figures 1n and o). In line with
this observation, a Dcx mRNA decrease of about 25% was measured by
qPCR in hippocampal tissue of EPO versus placebo-treated mice as early as
6 h after the first EPO injection (mean±s.e.m.; 247±13
versus 184±18; original values x105;
P=0.012; n=8 per group).
Increase in neuron numbers by EPO is paralleled by increase in
oligodendrocytes and myelin proteins
Many hippocampal pyramidal neurons have myelinated axons, and we wondered
whether more neurons are associated with more oligodendrocytes. Indeed,
numbers of oligodendrocyte lineage cells with cytoplasmic expression of
Olig1 were on average >20% increased in CA1/CA3 at week 4
following EPO (Figures 2a and b), as were
myelin-associated proteins, Golli33, MBP and CNPase (Figures 2c and d). Control proteins (GAD67, Grp75, Tom20 and
TrkB) were all unchanged (data not shown). Double staining for BrdU and
Olig1 revealed similar numbers in both treatment groups (Figures 2e and f). Consistent with stimulated differentiation
of preexisting OPC by EPO, a transient reduction in PDGFRα+ cells
was observed at 72h (Figures 2g and h). This
reduction was no longer visible at 4 weeks (Figure
2i).OPC can differentiate into oligodendrocytes without dividing.[26] We repeated the EPO experiment
(Figure 1a) in mice, expressing
tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ERT2 under control of the endogenous NG2
locus.[34] Crossing this
line with R26R-td-tomato-mEGFP(mT/mG),[35] mice allowed OPC cell fate mapping. In
tamoxifen-pretreated mice (two injections on postnatal days 26 and 27,
inducing reporter expression in ~60% of hippocampal OPC), EPO
increased GFP+/CC-1+ and total CC-1+ oligodendrocytes at
week 4 (Figures 2j–m). Supporting a direct
EPO effect on OPC, endogenously labeled cells express EPOR (Figure 2n; Supplementary
Figures 2A and B). Moreover, cultured OPC produce rising EPOR
mRNA levels over time, parallel to myelin gene induction, whereas
progenitor-specific transcripts decrease (Supplementary
Figure 2C).
Elevated neuronal numbers correlate with elevated
15N-leucine incorporation
Our data on preexisting OPC that differentiate under EPO, led us to search
for analogous effects in the neuronal lineage. Unfortunately, specific
molecular markers for preexisting neuronal progenitors do not exist at
present and thus, there is no corresponding neuronal Cre-ERT2mouse line
available. We therefore searched for alternative ways to explain how so many
(~20%) newly differentiated neurons appear upon EPO without prior
local cell division. We used multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry,
NanoSIMS,[41] to identify
pyramidal neurons with higher than average 15N-leucine
incorporation. In absence of proliferation markers, this would be indirect
evidence for induced protein synthesis, necessarily associated with the
differentiation and physical growth of large pyramidal neurons from
inconspicuous precursors (Figures
3a–i).
Figure 3
15N-leucine incorporation in CA1 pyramidal neurons evaluated by
nanoscopic secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS). (a) Overview
of the hippocampus showing dense proliferation signals (EdU) in the dentate
gyrus. The white square illustrates the EdU signal-free area in the
pyramidal layer, analyzed by NanoSIMS. (b and c) Illustration
of samples following placebo treatment; (d, e and
e') Illustration of samples following erythropoietin (EPO)
treatment; arrows in e' point to newly generated neuronal cell
mass with high15N/14N ratio; stars in
e' denote ‘control' signal in cytoplasmic regions
of older neurons. (f and g) Scatter plots of
15N/14N ratios in pyramidal neurons in both
treatment groups. (h and i) Coefficient of variation of
15N/14N ratios in cytoplasm and nuclei of
pyramidal neurons (n=3 for both groups). All bar graphs are
shown as mean±s.e.m.; **P<0.01 (unpaired
two-tailed t-test).
When we compared the 15N/14N ratio in
EdU-/NeuN+ pyramidal neurons at week 4 (Figure
1a), this ratio clearly scattered toward higher values upon EPO
(Figures 3f and g), indicative of a
pronounced increase in newly synthesized protein in a sub-population of
pyramidal neurons. Indeed, neurons with higher
15N-leucine-incorporation upon EPO amounted to ~20% in
CA1, in agreement with the increased cell number detected by stereology
(cresyl violet) and by CTIP2 staining. The coefficient of variation of
the15N/14N ratio was augmented in neuronal
nuclei and cytoplasm (Figures 3h and i).
Effect of EPO on classical neurogenic regions
Our results do not support newly formed neurons from mitotic (BrdU
incorporating) progenitors as a source of the increased numbers in
CA1/CA3. However, 1 week after EPO treatment start, also the
'classical' adult neurogenesis areas showed a response. We found
an increase under EPO in BrdU+ cells in SVZ and a similar tendency in
DG, in both without altered apoptosis (Supplementary
Figures 3A and B). The rise in Dcx+ neurons in DG is
compatible with stimulated differentiation under EPO also in this niche
(Supplementary Figure 3C). At week 4, in
contrast, we found a reduction in BrdU+ cells in DG/SVZ, likely as
a consequence of temporary depletion of progenitors or negative feedback on
neurogenesis (Supplementary Figure 3D). We
also noted increased apoptosis (Supplementary Figure
3E), potentially because of abnormal crowding of maturing
neurons, comparable numbers of Dcx+ cells at week 4 (Supplementary Figure 3f), and more BrdU/NeuN
double-labeled neurons upon EPO (Supplementary Figures
3G–I). These data may suggest that EPO transiently
stimulates neuronal precursor proliferation in neurogenesis areas. This
stimulation, however, is—according to our working model—probably
indirect, that is, a consequence of EPO-induced precursor differentiation
(and thus transient depletion) rather than a direct EPO effect, as supported
by our in vitro experiments (see below).
Persistence of increased neuron numbers under cognitive
challenge
Next, an experiment was designed to explore the old neurologists' rule,
‘use-it-or-lose-it'. Starting at week 4 (time point
0 in Figure 1a), mice were for 22 weeks either
exposed to long-term standard housing without stimulation or to regular
cognitive challenge using the touch-screen paradigm. This paradigm,
requiring hippocampal functions,[47,
48] allows assessment of visual
discrimination learning over long time periods. EPO-treated mice needed less
time to finish the touch-screen task (Figure
4a). Mice that had completed the task continued with regular
touch-screen performance to remain cognitively demanded until 6 months of
age. At this time point, EPO-treated mice without challenge revealed only
marginally elevated neuron numbers in CA3 (Figure
4b), whereas continuously challenged mice had retained their
increased neuron counts in CA1/CA3 (Figure
4c). Independent of EPO or placebo treatment, cognitively
challenged mice had higher pyramidal neuron numbers altogether. These data
show that enhanced pyramidal neuron numbers induced by EPO in young mice are
maintained under conditions of ongoing cognitive challenge but not in its
absence: ‘Use-it-or-lose-it'.
Figure 4
Use-it-or-lose-it experiment. (a) Long-term learning curve in the
touch-screen visual discrimination task showing significantly earlier task
completion of erythropoietin (EPO)-treated mice (placebo
n=11 and EPO n=10, log-rank
(Mantel–Cox) test). (b and c) Pyramidal neuron counts
obtained by stereological counting at 6 months of age (4 months after
cessation of EPO/placebo treatment) in mice without
(n=10 in case of CA1 for both groups, and
n=9 and n=10 in case of CA3 for placebo and
EPO groups, respectively) (b) or with (n=11 for
placebo, for EPO n=8 and n=9 in CA1 and CA3,
respectively) (c) continuous cognitive challenge using touch-screen.
All bar graphs shown as mean±s.e.m. (all analyses unpaired one-tailed
t-tests).
EPO reduces proliferating neurosphere diameter and number
Based on our in vivo findings, we wondered whether—similar to
the hematopoietic system—EPO may drive differentiation rather than
directly stimulate proliferation. Dissociated tertiary neurospheres from E14
forebrain cultures (Supplementary Figure 4A)
were grown in suspension clusters with FGF-2/EGF.[49] Under these conditions, neurospheres
sustain mainly symmetrically dividing NSC.[50] As prerequisite for testing the EPO influence on
these cultures, EPOR mRNA expression was confirmed by qPCR and EPOR function
by MAPK activation[3] (Supplementary Figure 4B). After 144h of EPO
exposure, a decrease in total number and average diameter of neurospheres
substantiated an inhibitory EPO effect on NSC proliferation (Figures 5a–c).
Figure 5
Erythropoietin (EPO) effects on proliferation and differentiation of E14
forebrain neurospheres and role of miR124; (a-c) Quaternary
E14 forebrain neurospheres cultured under proliferating conditions:
histogram showing total number (a) and number by diameter
(n=4 per group, paired two-tailed t-test)
(b) of quaternary neurospheres at 144 h after EPO/placebo
(n=4 per group, paired two-tailed t-test).
(c) Phase contrast image of neurospheres. (d-j)
Quaternary E14 forebrain neurospheres cultured under differentiating
conditions: (d-h) qPCR/western blot results of
differentiation markers. EPO-induced changes are expressed as %
difference from placebo at the respective time point. Compare Supplementary Table 3. (d) Early neural
marker Sox9, shown at mRNA level (0.3 h: n=5,
24 h: n=5, 96 h: n=5,
168 h: n=6, paired two-tailed t-test per
time point), as well as protein level (n=3 per group, paired
two-tailed t-test per time point) together with a sample western
blot. (e) Early neural marker ND1 (0.3 h: n=6,
24 h: n=6, 96 h: n=5,
168 h: n=6, paired two-tailed t-test per
time point). (f) Dcx/MAP2 ratio (0.3 h:
n=6, 24 h: n=10, 96 h:
n=9, 168 h: n=6, paired
two-tailed t-test per time point). (g and h) GFAP
(0.3 h: n=7, 24 h: n=7,
96 h: n=6, 168 h: n=7, paired
two-tailed t-test per time point) and S100B (0.3 h:
n=6, 24 h: n=11, 96 h:
n=9, 168h: n=6, paired two-tailed
t-test per time point). (i and j) miR124
expression and consequence of miR124 knockdown in proliferating
neurospheres: (i) miR124 expression in proliferating neurospheres at
6h after addition of EPO/placebo (n=8 per group, paired
two-tailed t-test). (j) Neurospheres with diameter
>100 μm at 96h after addition of EPO/placebo to
neurospheres transfected with miR124 antisense (AS) or scrambled sense
(control) oligos (n=4 per group, paired one-tailed
t-test). (k) miR124 expression in hippocampus of 28
day-old mice 6h after treatment with EPO/placebo (n=8
per group, unpaired one-tailed t-test). All n-numbers given for the
in vitro data are derived from biological replicates, that is,
independent cell preparations. All bar graphs are shown as
mean±s.e.m.; *P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001.
Neurospheres respond to EPO with accelerated differentiation
Next, dissociated tertiary neurospheres were plated in serum-free medium and
treated with EPO or placebo (Supplementary Figure
4C). Again, EPOR mRNA expression and functionality were
documented (Supplementary Figure 4D). Sox9,
ND1, Dcx, MAP2, GFAP and S100B were used as differentiation markers on mRNA
level. Compared with placebo (Supplementary Figure
4E; Supplementary Table 2),
Sox9 and ND1 strongly and lastingly decreased after EPO (Figures 5d and e; Supplementary Table
3), as did the Dcx/MAP2 ratio, pointing to accelerated
neuronal differentiation (Figure 5f; Supplementary Table 3). The decreased Sox9
expression was further confirmed on protein level at the 96 h time
point (Figure 5d). GFAP and S100B increased,
consistent with enhanced glial cell numbers paralleling the progression of
neuronal differentiation (Figures 5g and h;
Supplementary Table 3).[51] Neurosphere culture composition, cell
death and total cell number are presented in Supplementary Figures 4F–H.
Candidate mediator of EPO effects on neural precursors:
miR124
Transcription factor Sox9 and microRNA miR124 are critical for the
homeostasis of differentiation and proliferation in adult neurogenesis and
functionally connected;[52, 53] miR124 is increased during
differentiation and elevated in type A neuroblasts after transition from
amplifying type C cells.[54] We
asked whether changes in miR124 expression occur also under EPO. Indeed,
miR124 was upregulated in NSC 6 h after EPO addition (Figure 5i). Importantly, the EPO-mediated reduction
in neurosphere numbers was prevented upon miR124 knockdown (Figures 5b and j). Increased miR124 expression was
also found in hippocampus of 28-day-old mice, 6h after a single i.p.
injection of EPO (Figure 5k). Thus, EPO may act
on neurodifferentiation at least partially via miR124.
E17 hippocampal neurons exposed to EPO show rapid shifts in neural
differentiation marker expression
Neurosphere cultures contain mainly early precursor cells, with a small
fraction differentiating into neurons (Supplementary
Figure 4F). Therefore, we studied E17 hippocampal neuron
cultures (E17-HCC) to explore the EPO influence on cells at a more advanced
differentiation stage (Supplementary Figure
5A). EPOR mRNA expression and functionality were proven
(Supplementary Figure 5B). Comparable to
neurospheres, Sox9 mRNA was rapidly upregulated upon EPO and declined
thereafter (Supplementary Figures 5C and D;
Supplementary Table 5). ND1 (Supplementary Figure 5E) and Dcx/MAP2
decreased as well (Supplementary Figure 5F;
Supplementary Table 5). Dcx/MAP2
decrease was confirmed on protein level by immunocytochemistry-based
integrated density (Supplementary Figures 5G and
H). GFAP and S100B in E17-HCC responded to EPO with
short-lived decrease (Supplementary Figures 5I and
J; Supplementary Table 5).
Culture composition, cell death and total cell number were unchanged
(Supplementary Figures 5K–M).
EPO-induced differentiation provokes earlier maturation of
neurons
To explore effects on synapse maturation, E17-HCC were treated with
EPO/placebo 0.3 h after seeding and analyzed on day 8, when first
excitatory synapses are formed.[55]
As biochemical indicators of synapse maturation/synaptic activity, we
used synaptotagmin I (SytI) and synapsin I (SynI). Antibodies against the
luminal domain of SytI were used previously to examine the exo-endocytotic
recycling of synaptic vesicles and reflect the number of exocytotic
events.[56] Cells were
quadruply stained (Figure 6a).[43]
Figure 6b illustrates the progressed
differentiation at d8, with Dcx expression fading and MAP2 dominating. The
EPO effect is again reflected in the decreased Dcx/MAP2 ratio (Figure 6c). We stained for SynI and SytI (Figures 6d and e) and created masks for both markers
(Figure 6f). Their colocalization indicates
active synapses[56] (Figure 6f, white spots) whereas SynI single positive
puncta refer to inactive synapses (Figure 6f,
red spots). The size of the colocalized area (active area, white spots) was
taken as a measure of synaptic activity. Whereas we found no change in the
number of active synapses (data not shown), an increase in mean active area
per spot was detected (Figure 6g), indicating
progressed neuronal maturation under EPO.
Figure 6
Effects of erythropoietin (EPO) on neuronal differentiation and maturation,
determined by mean active area of synapses in E17-HCC. Neurons (d8) were
quadruply stained for differentiation markers Dcx and MAP2 and activity
markers Synaptotagmin I (SytI) and Synapsin I (SynI) (n=8).
Staining was analyzed by confocal microscopy. (a) The protocol
includes three sequential scans with fixed emission windows (orange) with
different excitation wave length. Excitation (dashed line) and emission
(solid line) spectra are shown for each fluorescent dye, Alexa Fluor 488
(MAP2, green), Alexa Fluor 546 (SynI, blue), Alexa Fluor 594 (SytI, red) and
Alexa Fluor 633 (Dcx, black). 4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
fluorescence was determined using an additional excitation at 406 nm.
(b) Unmixed confocal picture showing differentiation markers Dcx
(red), MAP2 (green) and DAPI (blue). (c) Quantification of the
integrated density of Dcx and MAP2 presented as ratio (n=8
per group, paired one-tailed t-test). (d) Unmixed confocal
picture showing SytI (green) and SynI (red). (e) Higher magnification
of the square mark of picture d, showing single stained dots for SytI
(green, arrowhead), single stained dots for SynI (red, star) and colocalized
dots (yellow, arrow). (f) Masked images for analyzing the number and
area of SytI (green, arrowhead), SynI (red, star) and colocalized (white,
arrow) dots. (g) Quantification of the mean overlapping (colocalized)
area as mean active area (white spots in f, n=8 per
group, paired two-tailed t-test). All n-numbers given are derived
from biological replicates, that is, independent cell preparations. All bar
graphs are shown as mean±s.e.m.; *P<0.05.
Discussion
We report here the unexpected observation that a 3-week systemic administration
of EPO, known to cross the blood–brain barrier,[2, 12, 57] induced a ~20% increase in CA1/CA3
neurons and oligodendrocytes in young mice. We ruled out local proliferation of
neural precursor cells and antiapoptotic effects of EPO[1, 2] as underlying
mechanisms. Conversely, we found a decrease in BrdU-positive and an increase in
apoptotic cells, compatible with depletion of local precursors and death of a
subset of newly generated (supernumerary) neurons. However, the concept of
‘preexisting neuronal precursors' is at variance with the
conventional view of adult neurogenesis, as opposed to preexisting
oligodendrocyte precursors, which are widely accepted.[26] We are certainly aware of open experimental
questions that preclude final conclusions at this stage, but we will discuss our
data in a ‘working model' to help guiding future research. This
working model is novel and, if confirmed by other labs, the underlying concept
of adult neurogenesis without entering cell cycle may be reminiscent of adult
OPC that can also trans-differentiate without proliferation. Both could be of
major significance for rapid regenerative processes in the brain.For proof-of-concept that the elevated number of oligodendrocytes upon EPO is
derived from preexisting OPC, we used mice expressing an inducible
oligodendrocyte lineage marker, the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ERT2
gene[58] under control of the
endogenous NG2 promoter.[34] Indeed, we
found increased numbers of labeled oligodendrocytes at 4 weeks after initiation
of EPO treatment. Unfortunately, specific molecular markers for genetically
targeting analogous neuronal precursor stages remain to be defined and Cre-ERT2
tools to be developed. We therefore used advanced mass spectroscopy,
NanoSIMS,[41] to support the
possibility that ~20% of CA1/CA3 neurons (as detected by stereology
and CTIP2 staining) were newly generated. Intriguingly, we found exactly this
percentage of neurons in CA1 with highly elevated 15N-leucine
incorporation upon EPO in absence of proliferation markers. This finding is
indeed consistent with enhanced protein synthesis underlying the growth of newly
differentiated pyramidal neurons from preexisting postmitotic local precursors.
Future studies will have to address whether similar results can be obtained in
other central nervous system regions.Complementing the pivotal work of many groups on adult neurogenesis in distinct
regions of the brain, such as DG and SVZ, for example, see refs 21, 52, 59, our findings have led us to a working model, in
which we discuss the postnatal delivery of new functional neurons and
oligodendrocytes in the hippocampus from a pool of local precursors, outside the
'classical' neurogenic regions. In this working model, migration of
precursors from DG/SVZ to the hippocampus, as induced in disease states, for
example, see refs 60, may ultimately replenish
this pool. Interestingly, using a nestin-GFP reporter mouse, a population of
bipolar cells was identified in CA1 that did not incorporate BrdU and was
negative for GFAP, S100B and Dcx. These cells were traced back to the corpus
callosum alveus, a region dorsal of CA1/CA3, where neuronal stem cells have
also been extracted from.[63, 64]In connection with disease models, EPO treatment was associated with increased
numbers of BrdU+ cells in DG and SVZ.[16, 17] This fact and also
the timing when BrdU+ cells were found enhanced are in good agreement with
our data. Even the observation of a decrease in BrdU+ cells in neurogenic
areas at week 4 as described here was similarly noted before, but understood as
lacking long-term effects of EPO on adult neurogenesis.[16] The conclusions drawn by others that EPO stimulates
neuroproliferation, however, are not supported here. In contrast, we interpret
our findings not (or only to a limited degree) as direct effects of EPO on
neuroproliferation but rather as feedback signaling of differentiating neurons
to proliferating progenitors. For example, the mere depletion of neuroblasts (by
EPO stimulated differentiation) could release the reported GABA brake on stem
cell proliferation.[65, 66]In neural stem cells (E14-NSC) and hippocampal cultures (E17-HCC), we found
evidence for EPO-induced differentiation/maturation rather than
proliferation. These findings are a major supportive argument for the validity
of our working model, and as such a central part of the present work. Although
the cultures differ in their differentiation state, EPO apparently targets the
same transcription factors, Sox9 and ND1. Similar findings on differentiation of
secondary NSC were reported previously,[17] whereas discrepant results were seen using
unphysiologically high doses, for example, Chen et al.[67] Importantly, miR124, known to regulate
Sox9[52, 53] and drive neuronal differentiation at the expense of
proliferation, is shown here to be stimulated by EPO and mediate its inhibitory
effect on neurosphere number/diameter. Clearly, the increase in miR124 upon
EPO in vivo and in vitro is small but consistent. Notably, the
growing literature on microRNAs in the brain indicates that even relatively
small changes in their levels can have substantial impact on cellular
function.[68, 69]The presently lacking information on further brain areas, for example, cortex or
cerebellum, female gender, other species or older age at EPO treatment still
limits the generalizability of our findings. Nevertheless, our MRI data showing
hippocampal enlargement were obtained from 15-week-old male mice, that is, from
animals where EPO administration had started at 11 (instead of 4) weeks of age.
We note that similar volume increases of hippocampal CA1/CA3 subfields were
reported recently by high-resolution MRI following EPO treatment in humanpatients.[11] This clinical
observation is in perfect agreement with our findings in healthy young mice and
may point to the relevance of EPO for neurogenesis also in advanced adulthood
and across species.Exploring how EPO acts on cognition, we presumably 'tapped' into a
physiological system of neuronal (re)generation from local precursors that can
be pharmacologically manipulated with recombinant humanEPO. One important
explanation why this novel type of postnatal neurogenesis has escaped detection
in the past is the astonishing finding that it occurs in absence of mitotic cell
division. Thus, it cannot be captured by incorporation of BrdU, tritiated
thymidine, or retroviral labeling strategies, classical tools in the
field.[23] The second reason for
detecting this type of neurogenesis by serendipity is that we have enhanced the
underlying transition of resident precursor cells to mature neurons and
oligodendrocytes by EPO. If this type of postnatal neurogenesis and gliogenesis
is likewise present in untreated mice, it may also occur at a low rate for
continuous on-demand delivery of neurons, which cannot easily be
demonstrated by absolute cell counts. First support for this hypothesis is the
increase in pyramidal CA1/CA3 neurons upon long-term cognitive challenge,
with and without EPO.In conclusion, our data provide a working model for the cellular basis of so far
unexplained but consistent clinical findings that EPO improves cognition in
mouse and man. Specifically, we note the possibility that neurons can be
generated rapidly, that is, without entering S-phase, and also outside the
'classical' neurogenesis areas, that is, from inconspicuous local
precursors that may have been overlooked. A conceptually similar scenario was
proven here for oligodendrocytes, demonstrating that their adult precursors (NG2
cells)[27, 29, 30] can more
efficiently differentiate under EPO without proliferation. Functionality of the
newly generated neurons is suggested by enhanced long-term potentiation in
Schaffer collateral CA1 synapses[7] and
by faster learning in the touch-screen setup as shown here, and of newly
generated oligodendrocytes by enhanced myelin protein expression. Given these
findings, the upregulation of EPO and EPOR in the injured brain is
intriguing.[2, 6] But independent of its role in central nervous system
regeneration, our observations add a new layer of complexity to postnatal
neurogenesis.
Authors: H H Marti; R H Wenger; L A Rivas; U Straumann; M Digicaylioglu; V Henn; Y Yonekawa; C Bauer; M Gassmann Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Alicia Izquierdo; Lisa M Wiedholz; Rachel A Millstein; Rebecca J Yang; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Andrew Holmes Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Sinem K Saka; Angela Vogts; Katharina Kröhnert; François Hillion; Silvio O Rizzoli; Johannes T Wessels Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Shenandoah Robinson; Christopher J Corbett; Jesse L Winer; Lindsay A S Chan; Jessie R Maxwell; Christopher V Anstine; Tracylyn R Yellowhair; Nicholas A Andrews; Yirong Yang; Laurel O Sillerud; Lauren L Jantzie Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Neeraj K Tiwari; Monica Sathyanesan; William Schweinle; Samuel S Newton Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Daniela Hoeber; Marco Sifringer; Yohan van de Looij; Josephine Herz; Stéphane V Sizonenko; Karina Kempe; Meray Serdar; Joanna Palasz; Martin Hadamitzky; Stefanie Endesfelder; Joachim Fandrey; Ursula Felderhoff-Müser; Ivo Bendix Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 6.543