M Gövercin1, S Meyer2, M Schellenbach3, E Steinhagen-Thiessen1, B Weiss4, M Haesner1. 1. a Geriatrics Research Group , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany. 2. b SIBIS Institut für Sozialforschung and Projektberatung GmbH , Berlin , Germany. 3. c Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee , Berlin , Germany. 4. d Technische Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: The primary objective of the SmartSenior@home study was to examine the acceptance of the SmartSenior system by older adults. METHODS: Twenty-eight partners from industry and research, including the health care sector, worked collaboratively to implement services aiming to maximize independence in old age. The prospective cohort study was conducted in Potsdam, Germany, with n = 35 older adults between 55 and 88 years of age in their apartments. All participants underwent extensive pre- and post-study visits with in-home interviews, functional assessments for cognition, fine motor skills, and mobility as well as responding to questionnaires on user acceptance and quality of life. RESULTS: The results indicate moderate-to-high user acceptance for the SmartSenior system. In particular, the services for general assistance and health, such as audio/video communication, blood pressure monitoring, and communication with a health professional, were rated as very attractive. Less used and less accepted services were those promoting social interaction and reminder services. CONCLUSION: Besides reliable functioning of the SmartSenior system, the availability of a confidant seems to be the most significant acceptance factor. As one conclusion of this trial, it is possible to develop, integrate, and test an infrastructure for ambient assisted living services in real life.
AIMS: The primary objective of the SmartSenior@home study was to examine the acceptance of the SmartSenior system by older adults. METHODS: Twenty-eight partners from industry and research, including the health care sector, worked collaboratively to implement services aiming to maximize independence in old age. The prospective cohort study was conducted in Potsdam, Germany, with n = 35 older adults between 55 and 88 years of age in their apartments. All participants underwent extensive pre- and post-study visits with in-home interviews, functional assessments for cognition, fine motor skills, and mobility as well as responding to questionnaires on user acceptance and quality of life. RESULTS: The results indicate moderate-to-high user acceptance for the SmartSenior system. In particular, the services for general assistance and health, such as audio/video communication, blood pressure monitoring, and communication with a health professional, were rated as very attractive. Less used and less accepted services were those promoting social interaction and reminder services. CONCLUSION: Besides reliable functioning of the SmartSenior system, the availability of a confidant seems to be the most significant acceptance factor. As one conclusion of this trial, it is possible to develop, integrate, and test an infrastructure for ambient assisted living services in real life.