Jonathan R Walker1, Sobhi Abadi2, Amir Solomonica3, Diab Mutlak3,1, Doron Aronson3,1, Yoram Agmon3,1, Jonathan Lessick4,5. 1. Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haaliya Street, Haifa, Israel. 2. Medical Imaging Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 3. Cardiology Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, Haifa, 31096, Israel. 4. Cardiology Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, Haifa, 31096, Israel. j_lessick@rambam.health.gov.il. 5. Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haaliya Street, Haifa, Israel. j_lessick@rambam.health.gov.il.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: With increasing use of prospective scanning techniques for cardiac computed tomography (CT), meaningful evaluation of chamber volumes is no longer possible due to lack of normal values. We aimed to define normal values for mid-diastolic (MD) chamber volumes and to determine their significance in comparison to maximum volumes. METHODS: Normal ranges at MD for left ventricular (LV) volume and mass and left atrial (LA) volume were determined from 101 normal controls. Thereafter, 109 consecutive CT scans, as well as 21 post-myocardial infarction patients, were analysed to determine the relationship between MD and maximum volumes. RESULTS: MD volumes correlated closely with maximal volumes (r = 0.99) for both LV and LA, and could estimate maximum volumes accurately. LV mass, measured at ED or MD, were very similar (r = 0.99). Abnormal MD volumes had excellent sensitivity and specificity to detect chamber enlargement based on maximal volumes (LV 86 %, 100 %, respectively; LA 100 %, 92 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single MD phase can identify patients with cardiomegaly or LV hypertrophy with a high degree of accuracy and MD volumes can give an accurate estimate of maximum LV and LA volumes. KEY POINTS: • Traditionally, helical cardiac CT provided clinically important information from chamber volume analysis. • Mid-diastolic left atrial and ventricular volumes correlate closely with maximal volumes. • We derive normal values for mid-diastolic left atrial and ventricular volumes and mass. • A single mid-diastolic phase can be used to identify chamber enlargement and hypertrophy.
OBJECTIVES: With increasing use of prospective scanning techniques for cardiac computed tomography (CT), meaningful evaluation of chamber volumes is no longer possible due to lack of normal values. We aimed to define normal values for mid-diastolic (MD) chamber volumes and to determine their significance in comparison to maximum volumes. METHODS: Normal ranges at MD for left ventricular (LV) volume and mass and left atrial (LA) volume were determined from 101 normal controls. Thereafter, 109 consecutive CT scans, as well as 21 post-myocardial infarctionpatients, were analysed to determine the relationship between MD and maximum volumes. RESULTS: MD volumes correlated closely with maximal volumes (r = 0.99) for both LV and LA, and could estimate maximum volumes accurately. LV mass, measured at ED or MD, were very similar (r = 0.99). Abnormal MD volumes had excellent sensitivity and specificity to detect chamber enlargement based on maximal volumes (LV 86 %, 100 %, respectively; LA 100 %, 92 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single MD phase can identify patients with cardiomegaly or LV hypertrophy with a high degree of accuracy and MD volumes can give an accurate estimate of maximum LV and LA volumes. KEY POINTS: • Traditionally, helical cardiac CT provided clinically important information from chamber volume analysis. • Mid-diastolic left atrial and ventricular volumes correlate closely with maximal volumes. • We derive normal values for mid-diastolic left atrial and ventricular volumes and mass. • A single mid-diastolic phase can be used to identify chamber enlargement and hypertrophy.
Authors: Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja S Meyer; Eugenio Martuscelli; Pietro Spagnolo; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Patricia Carrascosa; Thomas Anger; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Hatem Alkadhi; Stefan Martinoff; Martin Hadamitzky; Franziska Hein; Bernhard Bischoff; Miriam Kuse; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-05
Authors: Olivier Ecabert; Jochen Peters; Hauke Schramm; Cristian Lorenz; Jens von Berg; Matthew J Walker; Mani Vembar; Mark E Olszewski; Krishna Subramanyan; Guy Lavi; Jürgen Weese Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sujith K Seneviratne; Quynh A Truong; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Michael D Shapiro; Christopher L Schlett; Claudia U Chae; Ricardo Cury; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Fabian Bamberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Michael Toepker; Hang Lee; Ian S Rogers; Sujith K Seneviratne; Christopher L Schlett; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Elizabeth Hutchins; Ruibin Wang; Sina Rahmani; Rine Nakanishi; Sabina Haberlen; Lawrence Kingsley; Mallory D Witt; Frank Joseph Palella; Lisa Jacobson; Matthew J Budoff; Wendy S Post Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jeroen Walpot; Daniel Juneau; Samia Massalha; Girish Dwivedi; Frank J Rybicki; Benjamin J W Chow; João R Inácio Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Georgios Benetos; Ronny R Buechel; Marisa Gonçalves; Dominik C Benz; Elia von Felten; Georgios P Rampidis; Olivier F Clerc; Michael Messerli; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Cathérine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Christoph Gräni Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Rong Bing; James Henderson; Amanda Hunter; Michelle C Williams; Alastair J Moss; Anoop S V Shah; David A McAllister; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills; Philip D Adamson Journal: Heart Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Georgios Benetos; Dominik C Benz; Georgios P Rampidis; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Elia von Felten; Adam Bakula; Aleksandra Sustar; Tobias A Fuchs; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Catherine Gebhard; Philipp A Kaufmann; Christoph Gräni; Ronny R Buechel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-16 Impact factor: 5.315