Diana M Eccles1, Judith Balmaña2, Joe Clune3, Birgit Ehlken4, Annegret Gohlke4, Ceri Hirst3,5, Danielle Potter6, Claudia Schroeder4,7, Jerzy E Tyczynski6, Encarnacion B Gomez Garcia8. 1. Somers Cancer Research Building MP 824, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. d.m.eccles@soton.ac.uk. 2. Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3. AstraZeneca, Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, UK. 4. IMS Health, Munich, Germany. 5. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland. 6. AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 7. Novo Nordisk Pharma GmbH, Mainz, Germany. 8. Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: One of the most significant risk factors for the development of ovarian cancer (OC) is a genetic mutation in BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) or BRCA2. Here we describe the impact of previous and current guidance on BRCA testing practices and provide evidence about which characteristics best identify patients with OC and an underlying germline BRCA mutation. METHODS: A search was conducted for guidelines recommending genetic testing to identify constitutional pathogenic mutations in the BRCA genes. In addition, a systematic literature search of studies published in 2003-2015 was performed to assess BRCA mutation frequency in population-based OC patients unselected for patient characteristics (personal history, family history, and Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity) and to describe the association of patient characteristics with BRCA mutation. Exclusively, studies assessing epithelial OC or invasive epithelial OC with full-gene screening of both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 15 guidelines recommending genetic testing for OC patients, only 5 do not require co-occurrence of specific patient or family characteristics. Twenty-two full publications were identified that assessed germline BRCA mutation frequency in women with OC, utilizing a range of different full mutation detection methods. Germline BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with OC was 5.8-24.8%. Using criteria recommended in guidelines that are yet to be updated, we estimated that 27.5% of all germline BRCA mutations present in patients with OC may be missed because patients do not meet appropriate criteria. CONCLUSION: With the availability of BRCA mutation-targeted therapies, identification of patients with OC with germline BRCA mutations has potential therapeutic consequences. For identified gene carriers, predictive testing to allow cancer prevention strategies, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, provides wider benefit to identifying such gene carriers. Updating guidelines will increase the opportunity for targeted treatment among patients and risk reduction in relatives. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
INTRODUCTION: One of the most significant risk factors for the development of ovarian cancer (OC) is a genetic mutation in BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) or BRCA2. Here we describe the impact of previous and current guidance on BRCA testing practices and provide evidence about which characteristics best identify patients with OC and an underlying germline BRCA mutation. METHODS: A search was conducted for guidelines recommending genetic testing to identify constitutional pathogenic mutations in the BRCA genes. In addition, a systematic literature search of studies published in 2003-2015 was performed to assess BRCA mutation frequency in population-based OC patients unselected for patient characteristics (personal history, family history, and Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity) and to describe the association of patient characteristics with BRCA mutation. Exclusively, studies assessing epithelial OC or invasive epithelial OC with full-gene screening of both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 15 guidelines recommending genetic testing for OC patients, only 5 do not require co-occurrence of specific patient or family characteristics. Twenty-two full publications were identified that assessed germline BRCA mutation frequency in women with OC, utilizing a range of different full mutation detection methods. Germline BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with OC was 5.8-24.8%. Using criteria recommended in guidelines that are yet to be updated, we estimated that 27.5% of all germline BRCA mutations present in patients with OC may be missed because patients do not meet appropriate criteria. CONCLUSION: With the availability of BRCA mutation-targeted therapies, identification of patients with OC with germline BRCA mutations has potential therapeutic consequences. For identified gene carriers, predictive testing to allow cancer prevention strategies, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, provides wider benefit to identifying such gene carriers. Updating guidelines will increase the opportunity for targeted treatment among patients and risk reduction in relatives. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
Entities:
Keywords:
BRCA mutation; Genetic testing guidelines; Oncology; Ovarian cancer
Authors: Goli Samimi; Marcus Q Bernardini; Lawrence C Brody; Charlisse F Caga-Anan; Ian G Campbell; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Fergus J Couch; Michael Dean; Joanne A de Hullu; Susan M Domchek; Ronny Drapkin; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Friedlander; Mia M Gaudet; Marline G Harmsen; Karen Hurley; Paul A James; Janice S Kwon; Felicitas Lacbawan; Stephanie Lheureux; Phuong L Mai; Leah E Mechanic; Lori M Minasian; Evan R Myers; Mark E Robson; Susan J Ramus; Lisa F Rezende; Patricia A Shaw; Thomas P Slavin; Elizabeth M Swisher; Masataka Takenaka; David D Bowtell; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stacy W Gray; Rebecca A Ottesen; Madeline Currey; Mihaela Cristea; Janet Nikowitz; Susan Shehayeb; Vanessa Lozano; Julie Hom; Julie Kilburn; Lisa N Lopez; Sam Wing; Ernesto Sosa; Jenny Shen; Michael Morris; Bedros Dilsizian; Thomas Joseph; James Shen; Camille Adeimy; Tanyanika Phillips; Bahareh Bahadini; Joyce C Niland Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-09
Authors: Anthony Eccleston; Anthony Bentley; Matthew Dyer; Ann Strydom; Wim Vereecken; Angela George; Nazneen Rahman Journal: Value Health Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: George U Eleje; Ahizechukwu C Eke; Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Joseph I Ikechebelu; Emmanuel O Ugwu; Onyinye O Okonkwo Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-24
Authors: Anna DiNucci; Nora B Henrikson; M Cabell Jonas; Sundeep Basra; Paula Blasi; Jennifer Brown; Edward D Esplin; Dina Hassen; Jing Hao; Yirui Hu; Tracey Klinger; Ilene Ladd; Kathleen Leppig; Meredith Lewis; Michelle Meyer; Steven Ney; Arvind Ramaprasan; Katrina Romagnoli; Zachary Salvati; Aaron Scrol; Rachel Schwiter; Leigh Sheridan; Brinda Somasundaram; Pim Suwannarat; Jennifer K Wagner; Alanna K Rahm Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-06-11
Authors: Lucia Tortorella; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Domenico Fusco; William C Cho; Roberto Bernabei; Giovanni Scambia; Giuseppe Colloca Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 6.745