Literature DB >> 26808908

Accounting for metal bioavailability in assessing water quality: A step change?

Graham Merrington1, Adam Peters1, Christian E Schlekat2.   

Abstract

Bioavailability of metals to aquatic organisms can be considered to be a combination of the physicochemical factors governing metal behavior and the specific pathophysiological characteristics of the organism's biological receptor. Effectively this means that a measure of bioavailability will reflect the exposures that organisms in the water column actually "experience". This is important because it has long been established that measures of total metal in waters have limited relevance to potential environmental risk. The concept of accounting for bioavailability in regard to deriving and implementing environmental water quality standards is not new, but the regulatory reality has lagged behind the development of scientific evidence supporting the concept. Practical and technical reasons help to explain this situation. For example, concerns remain from regulators and the regulated that the efforts required to change existing systems of metal environmental protection that have been in place for over 35 yr are so great as not to be commensurate with likely benefits. However, more regulatory jurisdictions are now considering accounting for metal bioavailability in assessments of water quality as a means to support evidence-based decision-making. In the past decade, both the US Environmental Protection Agency and the European Commission have established bioavailability-based standards for metals, including Cu and Ni. These actions have shifted the debate toward identifying harmonized approaches for determining when knowledge is adequate to establish bioavailability-based approaches and how to implement them.
© 2016 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioavailability; Metal; Water quality guideline

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26808908     DOI: 10.1002/etc.3252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  4 in total

1.  Best Practices for Derivation and Application of Thresholds for Metals Using Bioavailability-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Eric Van Genderen; Jenny L Stauber; Charles Delos; Diana Eignor; Robert W Gensemer; James McGeer; Graham Merrington; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.218

2.  State of the Science on Metal Bioavailability Modeling: Introduction to the Outcome of a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Technical Workshop.

Authors:  Christian Schlekat; William Stubblefield; Kathryn Gallagher
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 3.  How Specific Is Site-Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks.

Authors:  Rick A van Dam; Alicia C Hogan; Andrew J Harford; Chris L Humphrey
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Development of a bioavailability-based risk assessment framework for nickel in Southeast Asia and Melanesia.

Authors:  Emily R Garman; Christian E Schlekat; Ellie Middleton; Graham Merrington; Adam Peters; Ross Smith; Jenny L Stauber; Kenneth My Leung; Francesca Gissi; Monique T Binet; Merrin S Adams; Megan L Gillmore; Lisa A Golding; Dianne Jolley; Zhen Wang; Amanda Reichelt-Brushett
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.