Literature DB >> 26808604

The Authors Respond.

Charles Poole1, Ian Shrier, Peng Ding, Tyler VanderWeele.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26808604      PMCID： PMC5598773          DOI： 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN： 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?

Authors:  Charlie Poole; Ian Shrier; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Exploring interaction effects in small samples increases rates of false-positive and false-negative findings: results from a systematic review and simulation study.

Authors:  Amand F Schmidt; Rolf H H Groenwold; Mirjam J Knol; Arno W Hoes; Mirjam Nielen; Kit C B Roes; Anthonius de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.437
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 6. Modeling Ratios or Differences? Let the Data Tell Us.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Controversy and Debate : Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 4 :Odds Ratios are far from "portable" - A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengli Xiao; Haitao Chu; Stephen R Cole; Yong Chen; Richard F MacLehose; David B Richardson; Sander Greenland
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The Interaction Continuum.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.822
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.