Literature DB >> 26807893

Accuracy of Unenhanced MR Imaging in the Detection of Acute Appendicitis: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review.

Iva Petkovska1, Diego R Martin1, Matthew F Covington1, Shannon Urbina1, Eugene Duke1, Z John Daye1, Lori A Stolz1, Samuel M Keim1, James R Costello1, Surya Chundru1, Hina Arif-Tiwari1, Dorothy Gilbertson-Dahdal1, Lynn Gries1, Bobby Kalb1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis in patients younger than 50 years who present to the emergency department with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study of 403 patients from August 1, 2012, to July 30, 2014, and waived the informed consent requirement. A cross-department strategy was instituted to use MR imaging as the primary diagnostic modality in patients aged 3-49 years who presented to the emergency department with RLQ pain. All MR examinations were performed with a 1.5- or 3.0-T system. Images were acquired without breath holding by using multiplanar half-Fourier single-shot T2-weighted imaging without and with spectral adiabatic inversion recovery fat suppression without oral or intravenous contrast material. MR imaging room time was measured for each patient. Prospective image interpretations from clinical records were reviewed to document acute appendicitis or other causes of abdominal pain. Final clinical outcomes were determined by using (a) surgical results (n = 77), (b) telephone follow-up combined with review of the patient's medical records (n = 291), or (c) consensus expert panel assessment if no follow-up data were available (n = 35). Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were determined.
RESULTS: Of the 403 patients, 67 had MR imaging findings that were positive for acute appendicitis, and 336 had negative findings. MR imaging had a sensitivity of 97.0% (65 of 67) and a specificity of 99.4% (334 of 336). The mean total room time was 14 minutes (range, 8-62 minutes). An alternate diagnosis was offered in 173 (51.5%) of 336 patients.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging is a highly sensitive and specific test in the evaluation of patients younger than 50 years with acute RLQ pain that uses a rapid imaging protocol performed without intravenous or oral contrast material. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26807893     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  T1 bright appendix sign to exclude acute appendicitis in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ilah Shin; Chansik An; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Utility of applying white blood cell cutoffs to non-diagnostic MRI and ultrasound studies for suspected pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas M Kennedy; Amy D Thompson; Arabinda K Choudhary; Richard J Caplan; Kathleen E Schenker; Andrew D DePiero
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Diagnostic utility of intravenous contrast for MR imaging in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Gray R Lyons; Pooja Renjen; Gulce Askin; Ashley E Giambrone; Debra Beneck; Arzu Kovanlikaya
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-01-21

4.  Visualization of the normal appendix in children: feasibility of a single contrast-enhanced radial gradient recalled echo MRI sequence.

Authors:  Shailee V Lala; Naomi Strubel; Nicole Nocera; Mark E Bittman; Nancy R Fefferman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Georgina Hicks; Richard Beable; Antony Higginson; Bo Rud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Optimisation of the MR protocol in pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ilah Shin; Yong Eun Chung; Chansik An; Hye Sun Lee; Honsoul Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Secondary imaging for suspected appendicitis after equivocal ultrasound: time to disposition of MRI compared to CT.

Authors:  James F Martin; David J Mathison; Paul C Mullan; Hansel J Otero
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-12-16

8.  Performance of overnight on-call radiology residents in interpreting unenhanced abdominopelvic magnetic resonance imaging studies performed for pediatric right lower quadrant abdominal pain.

Authors:  David M Sawyer; Raza Mushtaq; Srinivasan Vedantham; Faryal Shareef; Sara M Desoky; Hina Arif-Tiwari; Dorothy L Gilbertson-Dahdal; Unni K Udayasankar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-10

9.  "Showercap" Sign: Spontaneous Uterine Rupture in a Primiparous Woman.

Authors:  Emily Aherne; Katie Beauchamp; Niamh Maher; Thomas Walsh; William Boyd; Maeve Eogan; Leo Lawler
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2017-05-20

10.  MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Sayaka Misaki; Takayasu Iwai; Akinaga Sonoda; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.