| Literature DB >> 26807739 |
David W Mudge1, Neil Boudville2, Fiona Brown3, Philip Clayton4, Michelle Duddington5, Stephen Holt6,7, David W Johnson1, Matthew Jose8, Walaa Saweirs9, Kamal Sud10, David Voss11, Rowan Walker12.
Abstract
This paper updates a previous 'Call to Action' paper (Nephrology 2011; 16: 19-29) that reviewed key outcome data for Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patients and made recommendations to improve care. Since its publication, peritonitis rates have improved significantly, although they have plateaued more recently. Peritoneal dialysis patient and technique survival in Australian and New Zealand have also improved, with a reduction in the proportion of technique failures attributed to 'social reasons'. Despite these improvements, technique survival rates overall remain lower than in many other parts of the world. This update includes additional practical recommendations based on published evidence and emerging initiatives to further improve outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; outcome; peritoneal dialysis; peritonitis; quality indicator; technique survival
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26807739 DOI: 10.1111/nep.12731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephrology (Carlton) ISSN: 1320-5358 Impact factor: 2.506