Literature DB >> 26807537

Poststroke Rehabilitation and Restorative Care Utilization: A Comparison Between VA Community Living Centers and VA-contracted Community Nursing Homes.

Huanguang Jia1, Qinglin Pei, Charles T Sullivan, Diane C Cowper Ripley, Samuel S Wu, Barbara E Bates, W Bruce Vogel, Douglas E Bidelspach, Xinping Wang, Nannette Hoffman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective poststroke rehabilitation care can speed patient recovery and minimize patient functional disabilities. Veterans affairs (VA) community living centers (CLCs) and VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs) are the 2 major sources of institutional long-term care for Veterans with stroke receiving care under VA auspices.
OBJECTIVES: This study compares rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care among Veterans residing in VA CLCs versus those Veterans in VA-contracted CNHs. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Retrospective observational.
SUBJECTS: All Veterans diagnosed with stroke, newly admitted to the CLCs or CNHs during the study period who completed at least 2 Minimum Data Set assessments postadmission. MEASURES: The outcomes were numbers of days for rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care received by the Veterans during their stays in CLCs or CNHs as documented in the Minimum Data Set databases.
RESULTS: For rehabilitation therapy, the CLC Veterans had lower user rates (75.2% vs. 76.4%, P=0.078) and fewer observed therapy days (4.9 vs. 6.4, P<0.001) than CNH Veterans. However, the CLC Veterans had higher adjusted odds for therapy (odds ratio=1.16, P=0.033), although they had fewer average therapy days (coefficient=-1.53±0.11, P<0.001). For restorative nursing care, CLC Veterans had higher user rates (33.5% vs. 30.6%, P<0.001), more observed average care days (9.4 vs. 5.9, P<0.001), higher adjusted odds (odds ratio=2.28, P<0.001), and more adjusted days for restorative nursing care (coefficient=5.48±0.37, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with their counterparts at VA-contracted CNHs, Veterans at VA CLCs had fewer average rehabilitation therapy days (both unadjusted and adjusted), but they were significantly more likely to receive restorative nursing care both before and after risk adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26807537     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  Health Services Research in Rehabilitation and Disability-The Time is Now.

Authors:  James E Graham; Addie Middleton; Pamela Roberts; Trudy Mallinson; Janet Prvu-Bettger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Regional variation in post-stroke multidisciplinary rehabilitation care among veteran residents in community nursing homes.

Authors:  Huanguang Jia; Qinglin Pei; Charles T Sullivan; Diane C Cowper Ripley; Samuel S Wu; W Bruce Vogel; Xinping Wang; Douglas E Bidelspach; Jennifer L Hale-Gallardo; Barbara E Bates
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Enhancing health and independent living for veterans with disabilities by leveraging community-based resources.

Authors:  Jennifer Hale-Gallardo; Huanguang Jia; Tony Delisle; Charles E Levy; Valentina Osorio; Jennifer A Smith; Elizabeth M Hannold
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2017-01-20

4.  Disparities in Anticoagulant Therapy Initiation for Incident Atrial Fibrillation by Race/Ethnicity Among Patients in the Veterans Health Administration System.

Authors:  Utibe R Essien; Nadejda Kim; Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria K Mor; Chester B Good; Jared W Magnani; Terrence M A Litam; Walid F Gellad; Michael J Fine
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.