| Literature DB >> 26807043 |
Arash Moghaddam1, Lisa Breier2, Patrick Haubruck1, Daniel Bender3, Bahram Biglari4, Andreas Wentzensen5, Gerald Zimmermann6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study we sought to determine if application of bone morphogenic protein 7 (BMP-7) promotes physiological bone healing of non-unions and to investigate if serum cytokine analysis may serve as a promising tool in the analysis of adjunct non-union therapy. Therefore we analyzed the influence of BMP-7 application on the serum cytokine expression patterns on patients with impaired bone healing compared to patients that showed proper bone healing.Entities:
Keywords: BMP-7; Cytokines; Fracture healing; Non-union; PDGF; Pseudarthrosis; TGF- β; bFGF
Year: 2016 PMID: 26807043 PMCID: PMC4724145 DOI: 10.1186/s12950-016-0111-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm (Lond) ISSN: 1476-9255 Impact factor: 4.981
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics
| Gender | Age | Type of Fracture (AO) | Lokalisation of Fracture | Fixation | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | N | ♀ | ♂ | A | B | C | C1° | Femur | Tibia | Forearm | Upper arm | Nail | Plate | Ext. Fix. | |
| All patients | 45 | 9 | 36 | 47,37 ±11,54 | 30 | 12 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 48 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 36 | 3 |
| Union group | 15 | 3 | 12 | 47,2 ±12,00 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 1 |
| Non-union group | 15 | 3 | 12 | 47,53 ±11,48 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 1 |
| BMP-7 group | 15 | 3 | 12 | 47,53 ±11,48 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 1 |
Abbreviations: BMP-7 Bone morphogenic protein 7; Ext. Fix. Osteosynthesis by external fixation; AO AO-Classification. Age is expressed as mean years ± SD
Fig. 1Analysis of serum TGF-β expression level. TGF-β serum level comparison over time for the entire study patients divided into groups (Union: Fracture patients with proper healing, Non-Union: Fracture patients developing non-unions, BMP-7: Non-union patients treated with BMP-7) expressed as means and SEM. Serum concentration was measured in nanogram per milliliter (ng/ml). The Wilcoxon signed rank test assessed significant differences between both groups at each particular time point (* indicates significant differences between the Non-Union and BMP-7 Group, whereas † indicates significant differences between Union and Non-Union Group p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Analysis of serum PDGF expression level. PDGF serum level comparison over time for the entire study patients divided into groups (Union: Fracture patients with proper healing, Non-Union: Fracture patients developing non-unions, BMP-7: Non-union patients treated with BMP-7) expressed as means and SEM. Serum concentration was measured in nanogram per milliliter (ng/ml). The Wilcoxon signed rank test assessed significant differences between both groups at each particular time point (* indicates significant differences between the Non-Union and BMP-7 Group, whereas † indicates significant differences between Union and Non-Union Group p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Analysis of serum BFGF expression level. BFGF serum level comparison over time for the entire study patients divided into groups (Union: Fracture patients with proper healing, Non-Union: Fracture patients developing non-unions, BMP-7: Non-union patients treated with BMP-7) expressed as means and SEM. Serum concentration was measured in nanogram per milliliter (ng/ml). The Wilcoxon signed rank test assessed significant differences between both groups at each particular time point († indicates significant differences between the Non-Union and Union Group, * indicates significant differences between the Non-Union and BMP-7 Group, whereas ‡ indicates significant differences between Union and BMP-7 Group p < 0.05)