Literature DB >> 26806982

Application of ATP-based bioluminescence for bioaerosol quantification: effect of sampling method.

Taewon Han1, Melody Wren1, Kelsey DuBois1, Jennifer Therkorn1, Gediminas Mainelis1.   

Abstract

An adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-based bioluminescence has potential to offer a quick and affordable method for quantifying bioaerosol samples. Here we report on our investigation into how different bioaerosol aerosolization parameters and sampling methods affect bioluminescence output per bacterium, and implications of that effect for bioaerosol research. Bacillus atrophaeus and Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria were aerosolized by using a Collison nebulizer (BGI Inc., Waltham, MA) with a glass or polycarbonate jar and then collected for 15 and 60 min with: (1) Button Aerosol Sampler (SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA) with polycarbonate, PTFE, and cellulose nitrate filters, (2) BioSampler (SKC Inc.) with 5 and 20 mL of collection liquid, and (3) our newly developed Electrostatic Precipitator with Superhydrophobic Surface (EPSS). For all aerosolization and sampling parameters we compared the ATP bioluminescence output per bacterium relative to that before aerosolization and sampling. In addition, we also determined the ATP reagent storage and preparation conditions that that do not affect the bioluminescence signal intensity. Our results show that aerosolization by a Collison nebulizer with a polycarbonate jar yields higher bioluminescence output per bacterium compared to the glass jar. Interestingly enough, the bioluminescence output by P. fluorescens increased substantially after its aerosolization compared to the fresh liquid suspension. For both test microorganisms, the bioluminescence intensity per bacterium after sampling was significantly lower than that before sampling suggesting negative effect of sampling stress on bioluminescence output. The decrease in bioluminescence intensity was more pronounces for longer sampling times and significantly and substantially depended on the sampling method. Among the investigated method, the EPSS was the least injurious for both microorganisms and sampling times. While the ATP-based bioluminescence offers a quick bioaerosol sample analysis method, this works demonstrates that the method output depends on bioaerosol generation and sampling methods, as well as reagent storage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP Bioluminescence; Aerosolization; Bioaerosols; Sampling; Sampling stress

Year:  2015        PMID: 26806982      PMCID: PMC4717491          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Sci        ISSN: 0021-8502            Impact factor:   3.433


  20 in total

1.  Efficacy of Selected Respiratory Protective Equipment Challenged with Bacillus subtilis subsp. niger.

Authors:  B Johnson; D D Martin; I G Resnick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Interdigitated array microelectrodes based impedance biosensors for detection of bacterial cells.

Authors:  Madhukar Varshney; Yanbin Li
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Design and application of an inertial impactor in combination with an ATP bioluminescence detector for in situ rapid estimation of the efficacies of air controlling devices on removal of bioaerosols.

Authors:  Ki Young Yoon; Chul Woo Park; Jeong Hoon Byeon; Jungho Hwang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Detection of aerosolized biological agents using the piezoelectric immunosensor.

Authors:  David Kovář; Zdeněk Farka; Petr Skládal
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Normalization of test and evaluation of biothreat detection systems: overcoming microbial air content fluctuations by using a standardized reagent bacterial mixture.

Authors:  Laurent Berchebru; Pascal Rameil; Jean-Christophe Gaudin; Sabrina Gausson; Guilhem Larigauderie; Céline Pujol; Yannick Morel; Vincent Ramisse
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols.

Authors:  T Han; Y Nazarenko; P J Lioy; G Mainelis
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 7.  Cellular nucleotide measurements and applications in microbial ecology.

Authors:  D M Karl
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1980-12

Review 8.  Air pollution and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Barry A Franklin; Robert Brook; C Arden Pope
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 5.200

9.  Release of free DNA by membrane-impaired bacterial aerosols due to aerosolization and air sampling.

Authors:  Huajun Zhen; Taewon Han; Donna E Fennell; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Fungal allergens.

Authors:  W E Horner; A Helbling; J E Salvaggio; S B Lehrer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.809

Review 2.  Aerobiology: Experimental Considerations, Observations, and Future Tools.

Authors:  Allen E Haddrell; Richard J Thomas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Optimization of a Portable Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay Coupled with a Receiver Operating Characteristic Model to Assess Bioaerosol Concentrations on Site.

Authors:  Chun-Chieh Tseng; Yi-Chian Lu; Kai-Chih Chang; Chien-Che Hung
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-06-29

4.  An Impedance-Based Mold Sensor with on-Chip Optical Reference.

Authors:  Poornachandra Papireddy Vinayaka; Sander van den Driesche; Roland Blank; Muhammad Waseem Tahir; Mathias Frodl; Walter Lang; Michael J Vellekoop
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.