Literature DB >> 26806842

Can lung ultrasonography predict prone positioning response in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients?

Gwenaël Prat1, Solène Guinard2, Nicolas Bizien3, Emmanuel Nowak4, Jean-Marie Tonnelier5, Zarrin Alavi6, Anne Renault7, Jean-Michel Boles8, Erwan L'Her9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to assess whether lung ultrasonography (L-US) is a useful tool in prediction of prone positioning (PP) oxygenation response in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
METHODS: In a prospective study, 19 ARDS patients were included for assessment of PP oxygenation response. The latter was assessed for at least 12 hours 6 different ultrasonography windows were performed on each hemithorax before prone (H0, H2, H12 before return to supine and at H14 (2 hours after return to supine). Patients were classified into 2 groups (responders / non responders) according their oxygenation response to PP. Ultrasonography videos were blindly evaluated by 3 expert clinicians to classify lung regions as "normal", "moderate loss of aeration," "severe loss of aeration," or "lung consolidation." Oxygenation parameters were collected at H0, H2, and H14.
RESULTS: Association of each lung region aspect to PP oxygenation response was compared between the 2 groups. The normal aspect of the anterobasal regions was significantly associated with the oxygenation response (P = .0436), with a positive predictive value equal to or near 100%. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrated that a simple and short L-US examination could be a useful tool in prediction of PP oxygenation response in ARDS patients. A normal L-US pattern of both anterobasal lung regions in supine position may predict a significant PaO2/FIO2 ratio improvement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Lung ultrasonography; Prone positioning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26806842     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  16 in total

Review 1.  Thoracic ultrasonography: a narrative review.

Authors:  P H Mayo; R Copetti; D Feller-Kopman; G Mathis; E Maury; S Mongodi; F Mojoli; G Volpicelli; M Zanobetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Lung ultrasonography for assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS.

Authors:  Malik Haddam; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Sebastien Perbet; Alice Baldovini; Christophe Guervilly; Charlotte Arbelot; Alexandre Noel; Coralie Vigne; Emmanuelle Hammad; François Antonini; Samuel Lehingue; Eric Peytel; Qin Lu; Belaid Bouhemad; Jean-Louis Golmard; Olivier Langeron; Claude Martin; Laurent Muller; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Jean-Michel Constantin; Laurent Papazian; Marc Leone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Lung ultrasound response to awake prone positioning predicts the need for intubation in patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: an observational study.

Authors:  Miguel Ibarra-Estrada; María J Gamero-Rodríguez; Marina García-de-Acilu; Oriol Roca; Laura Sandoval-Plascencia; Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos; Roxana García-Salcido; Sara A Aguirre-Díaz; David L Vines; Sara Mirza; Ramandeep Kaur; Tyler Weiss; Claude Guerin; Jie Li
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 4.  Imaging the Injured Lung: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Maurizio Cereda; Yi Xin; Alberto Goffi; Jacob Herrmann; David W Kaczka; Brian P Kavanagh; Gaetano Perchiazzi; Takeshi Yoshida; Rahim R Rizi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Lung ultrasound can be used to predict the potential of prone positioning and assess prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Wang; Xin Ding; Hong-Min Zhang; Huan Chen; Long-Xiang Su; Da-Wei Liu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Application of Lung Ultrasound During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  David L Convissar; Lauren E Gibson; Lorenzo Berra; Edward A Bittner; Marvin G Chang
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Lung ultrasound: Predictor of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Qianqian Fan; Omer Cavus; Xuezheng Zhang
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Lung Ultrasound Scanning for Respiratory Failure in Acutely Ill Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Seth Koenig; Paul Mayo; Giovanni Volpicelli; Scott J Millington
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Prone positioning monitored by electrical impedance tomography in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome on veno-venous ECMO.

Authors:  Guillaume Franchineau; Nicolas Bréchot; Guillaume Hekimian; Guillaume Lebreton; Simon Bourcier; Pierre Demondion; Loïc Le Guennec; Ania Nieszkowska; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Alain Combes; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Lung ultrasound predicts clinical course and outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Yael Lichter; Yan Topilsky; Philippe Taieb; Ariel Banai; Aviram Hochstadt; Ilan Merdler; Amir Gal Oz; Jacob Vine; Or Goren; Barak Cohen; Orly Sapir; Yoav Granot; Tomer Mann; Shirley Friedman; Yoel Angel; Nimrod Adi; Michal Laufer-Perl; Merav Ingbir; Yaron Arbel; Idit Matot; Yishay Szekely
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.