A Brekkan1, E Berntorp2, K Jensen2, E I Nielsen1, S Jönsson1. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Clinical Coagulation Research Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) models describing factor IX (FIX) activity levels in plasma, in combination with individual FIX measurements, may be used to individualize dosing in the treatment of hemophilia B. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to reevaluate a previously developed POPPK model for FIX activity and to explore the number and timing of FIX samples required in pharmacokinetic (PK) dose individualization. METHODS: The POPPK model was reevaluated using an extended data set. Several sampling schedules, varying with respect to the timing and number of samples, were evaluated in a simulation study with relative dose errors compared between schedules. The performance of individually calculated doses was compared with commonly prescribed FIX doses with respect to the number of patients with a trough FIX activity > 0.01 U mL(-1) . RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A three-compartment PK model best described the FIX activity levels. The number and timing of samples greatly influenced imprecision in dose prediction. Schedules with single samples taken on both day 2 and day 3 were identified as being convenient schedules with an acceptable performance level. Individually calculated doses performed better with respect to patient target attainment than a fixed 40 U kg(-1) dose regardless of how many samples were available to calculate individual doses. The results of this study suggest that PK dose tailoring with limited sampling may be applicable for plasma-derived FIX products.
BACKGROUND: Population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) models describing factor IX (FIX) activity levels in plasma, in combination with individual FIX measurements, may be used to individualize dosing in the treatment of hemophilia B. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to reevaluate a previously developed POPPK model for FIX activity and to explore the number and timing of FIX samples required in pharmacokinetic (PK) dose individualization. METHODS: The POPPK model was reevaluated using an extended data set. Several sampling schedules, varying with respect to the timing and number of samples, were evaluated in a simulation study with relative dose errors compared between schedules. The performance of individually calculated doses was compared with commonly prescribed FIX doses with respect to the number of patients with a trough FIX activity > 0.01 U mL(-1) . RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A three-compartment PK model best described the FIX activity levels. The number and timing of samples greatly influenced imprecision in dose prediction. Schedules with single samples taken on both day 2 and day 3 were identified as being convenient schedules with an acceptable performance level. Individually calculated doses performed better with respect to patient target attainment than a fixed 40 U kg(-1) dose regardless of how many samples were available to calculate individual doses. The results of this study suggest that PK dose tailoring with limited sampling may be applicable for plasma-derived FIX products.
Authors: Alanna McEneny-King; Pierre Chelle; Gary Foster; Arun Keepanasseril; Alfonso Iorio; Andrea N Edginton Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Pierre Chelle; Cindy H T Yeung; Stacy E Croteau; Jennifer Lissick; Vinod Balasa; Christina Ashburner; Young Shil Park; Santiago Bonanad; Juan Eduardo Megías-Vericat; Azusa Nagao; Tung Wynn; Fernando Corrales-Medina; Huyen Tran; Anjali Sharathkumar; Meera Chitlur; Samuel Sarmiento; Andrea Edginton; Alfonso Iorio Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Alfonso Iorio; Arun Keepanasseril; Gary Foster; Tamara Navarro-Ruan; Alanna McEneny-King; Andrea N Edginton; Lehana Thabane Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-12-15
Authors: Pierre Chelle; Cindy H T Yeung; Santiago Bonanad; Juan Cristóbal Morales Muñoz; Margareth C Ozelo; Juan Eduardo Megías Vericat; Alfonso Iorio; Jeffrey Spears; Roser Mir; Andrea Edginton Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Tim Preijers; Lisette M Schütte; Marieke J H A Kruip; Marjon H Cnossen; Frank W G Leebeek; Reinier M van Hest; Ron A A Mathôt Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Alfonso Iorio; Andrea N Edginton; Victor Blanchette; Jan Blatny; Ana Boban; Marjon Cnossen; Peter Collins; Stacy E Croteau; Katheljin Fischer; Daniel P Hart; Shinya Ito; Joan Korth-Bradley; Stefan Lethagen; David Lillicrap; Mike Makris; Ron Mathôt; Massimo Morfini; Ellis J Neufeld; Jeffrey Spears Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2018-05-20