Literature DB >> 26806245

Social Media Use among United Kingdom Vascular Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Andrew R Cochrane1, James J McDonald1, Richard R W Brady2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Engagement with social media (SM) is increasing within the general population and medical professionals. Overall, SM engagement is divided between closed, private networks and open, public platforms, such as LinkedIn and Twitter. As engagement with SM is known to vary between specialties, this study was undertaken to evaluate the uptake of SM among vascular surgeons and to describe user demographics associated with SM engagement.
METHODS: Vascular surgeons were identified from the 2013 Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland Quality Improvement Project and cross-referenced with the General Medical Council registry. Identified individual surgeons were manually searched for on common SM platforms and via Google to identify both SM profiles and personal/partnership practice websites.
RESULTS: In total, 472 surgeons (442 men, 93.6%) from 112 National Health Service Trusts were identified. Three hundred forty (63.7%) graduated from UK universities with a mean graduating year of 1987 (range 1969-2000). Cumulatively, they performed 36,300 procedures (mean 72/surgeon; range 3-257). Overall, SM engagement was 47.4%; 217 (46.0%) had LinkedIn accounts and 23 (4.8%) had Twitter profiles. LinkedIn users had a mean of 69 connections (range 0-500+) and had a mean graduating year of 1988 (range 1969-2000). Twitter users had a mean of 258 followers (range 2-2424) and had tweeted a mean of 450 times (range 0-2865); they graduated more recently than their non-Twitter engaged colleagues (mean graduation 1991 vs. 1987, P = 0.006). Overall, SM usage was associated with a more recent graduation (P = 0.038) and with working in the private sector (21.4% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.029). There were demographic differences between those who had LinkedIn and Twitter accounts.
CONCLUSIONS: Twitter and LinkedIn engagement among vascular surgeons is higher than that of other surgical specialties. There is a significant link between the experience of the surgeon and with SM use.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26806245     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  6 in total

1.  Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists.

Authors:  D H Lui; J J McDonald; A de Beaux; B Tulloh; R R W Brady
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  The Trump Effect: With No Peer Review, How Do We Know What to Really Believe on Social Media?

Authors:  Justin T Brady; Molly E Kelly; Sharon L Stein
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 3.  Getting Started: A Social Media Primer.

Authors:  Dalya M Ferguson; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge?

Authors:  Xingbo Long; Lin Qi; Zhenyu Ou; Xiongbing Zu; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiting Zeng; Yuan Li; Minfeng Chen; Zhao Wang; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Use of Twitter by the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity, Impact Factor, and Alternative Metrics.

Authors:  Hannah Hughes; Andrew Hughes; Colin Murphy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-12-10

6.  The influence of social media on recruitment to surgical trials.

Authors:  Carly Nichola Bisset; Ben Carter; Jennifer Law; Jonathan Hewitt; Kat Parmar; Susan Joan Moug
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.