| Literature DB >> 26805832 |
Gianfranco Manes1, Giovanni Collodi2, Leonardo Gelpi3, Rosanna Fusco4, Giuseppe Ricci5, Antonio Manes6, Marco Passafiume7.
Abstract
This paper describes a distributed point-source monitoring platform for gas level and leakage detection in hazardous environments. The platform, based on a wireless sensor network (WSN) architecture, is organised into sub-networks to be positioned in the plant's critical areas; each sub-net includes a gateway unit wirelessly connected to the WSN nodes, hence providing an easily deployable, stand-alone infrastructure featuring a high degree of scalability and reconfigurability. Furthermore, the system provides automated calibration routines which can be accomplished by non-specialized maintenance operators without system reliability reduction issues. Internet connectivity is provided via TCP/IP over GPRS (Internet standard protocols over mobile networks) gateways at a one-minute sampling rate. Environmental and process data are forwarded to a remote server and made available to authenticated users through a user interface that provides data rendering in various formats and multi-sensor data fusion. The platform is able to provide real-time plant management with an effective; accurate tool for immediate warning in case of critical events.Entities:
Keywords: VOC monitoring; photoionization detectors; wireless sensor networks
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26805832 PMCID: PMC4732154 DOI: 10.3390/s16010121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) layout of the RAGE installation; (b) close-up of SNU and end node units (ENU) deployment around the wastewater treatment plant.
Figure 2PID schematic.
Figure 3Measured vs. linear PID calibration curve and relative error.
Figure 4Ionization and diffusion process under steady-state conditions.
Figure 5Concentration gradient.
Figure 6Measured α functions for PID 11-6.
Calculated C for each photoionization detectors (PID).
| PID # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 153 | 103.5 | 51 | 75 | 74 | 51 | n.a. |
| Co (ppb) | 118.7 | 136.6 | 109.5 | 116.3 | 119.5 | 108.0 |
Figure 7Average, measured α function and relative error percentage.
Figure 8Calibration curves measured and calculated for the set of six PIDs.
Figure 9(a) VOC and (b) H2S concentrations in the wastewater treatment plant area.
Figure 11VOC readouts from (a) northern side (Sink Node ENI 6) and (b) southern side (Sink Node ENI 7) with related wind direction (light green line) on Mantova installation.
Figure 10Layout of the six VOC detectors located around a chemical plant in Mantova.
Figure 12Concentration (radius, ppb) versus wind direction (angle) polar plot over 24 h.
Figure 13Pseudo-colour map of (a) VOC and (b) H2S concentrations over the RAGE refinery area.