Literature DB >> 2680549

National study on the utilization of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery, Belgium, 1986.

R Mertens1, L Verbist, B Gordts, S Lauwers, C Potvliege, G Reybrouck, G Verschraegen, G Wauters, L Berghmans, F Dondeyne.   

Abstract

During the last week of May 1986, a 1-week prospective study on antibiotic utilization in surgical patients was held in 104 (42%) of the 247 Belgian acute care hospitals. All surgical patients with a post-operative stay of at least 3 days were studied, involving 3112 patients. Each patient was observed for 7 days, starting from the day before surgery. Antibiotics were administered to 71.9% of all patients; 21.9% received therapeutic antibiotics and 52.9% prophylactic antibiotics; 2.9% received both. Of the 1285 patients undergoing a surgical procedure with no indication for antimicrobial prophylaxis, 50.7% nevertheless received prophylaxis; 92.8% of patients with a generally recognized indication for prophylaxis received antibiotic prophylaxis. Less than one fifth (17.1%) of all prophylactic courses were stopped on the day of the intervention whilst 26.3% were continued up to the fifth post-operative day or beyond. The most frequently prescribed drugs for this indication included first and second generation cephalosporins and nitroimidazoles. The number of different generic drugs utilized per hospital ranged from 1 to 18 (mean: 7.7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2680549      PMCID: PMC2249511          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800030673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  25 in total

1.  The value and duration of defence reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria.

Authors:  A A MILES; E M MILES; J BURKE
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1957-02

2.  The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.

Authors:  J F Burke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Use of antibiotics. A brief exposition of the problem and some tentative solutions.

Authors:  C M Kunin; T Tupasi; W A Craig
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Infections and use of antimicrobials in an 800-bed hospital.

Authors:  L D Edwards
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention.

Authors:  H C Polk; J F Lopez-Mayor
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.

Authors:  A B Kaiser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Measuring the saving attributable to an antibiotic prescribing policy.

Authors:  R C Stevenson; S C Blackman; C L Williams; C A Bartzokas
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The national prevalence survey of nosocomial infections in Belgium, 1984.

Authors:  R Mertens; G Kegels; A Stroobant; G Reybrouck; J M Lamotte; C Potvliege; V Van Casteren; S Lauwers; G Verschraegen; G Wauters
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  All-inclusive concurrent antibiotic usage review: a way to reduce misuse without formal controls.

Authors:  H S Heineman; V S Watt
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1986-03

10.  National prevalence survey of hospital-acquired infections in Italy, 1983.

Authors:  M L Moro; M A Stazi; G Marasca; D Greco; A Zampieri
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  1 in total

1.  The identification of barriers preventing the successful implementation of a surgical prophylaxis protocol.

Authors:  Kathryn M Burnett; Michael G Scott; Patricia M Kearney; W George Humphreys; Robert M McMillen
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.