Gary Globe1, Ronald J Farabaugh2, Cheryl Hawk3, Craig E Morris4, Greg Baker5, Wayne M Whalen6, Sheryl Walters7, Martha Kaeser8, Mark Dehen9, Thomas Augat10. 1. Senior Manager, Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. Electronic address: gglobe@amgen.com. 2. Private Practice, Columbus, OH. 3. Executive Director, Northwest Center for Lifestyle and Functional Medicine, University of Western States, Portland, OR. 4. Private Practice, Torrance, CA. 5. Private Practice, Chatsworth, GA. Electronic address: drgregbaker@yahoo.com. 6. Private Practice, Santee, CA. 7. Reference Librarian, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO. 8. Director of Academic Assessment, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO. 9. Private Practice, Mankato, MN. 10. Private Practice, Brunswick, ME.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to provide an update of a previously published evidence-based practice guideline on chiropractic management of low back pain. METHODS: This project updated and combined 3 previous guidelines. A systematic review of articles published between October 2009 through February 2014 was conducted to update the literature published since the previous Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP) guideline was developed. Articles with new relevant information were summarized and provided to the Delphi panel as background information along with the previous CCGPP guidelines. Delphi panelists who served on previous consensus projects and represented a broad sampling of jurisdictions and practice experience related to low back pain management were invited to participate. Thirty-seven panelists participated; 33 were doctors of chiropractic (DCs). In addition, public comment was sought by posting the consensus statements on the CCGPP Web site. The RAND-UCLA methodology was used to reach formal consensus. RESULTS: Consensus was reached after 1 round of revisions, with an additional round conducted to reach consensus on the changes that resulted from the public comment period. Most recommendations made in the original guidelines were unchanged after going through the consensus process. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports that doctors of chiropractic are well suited to diagnose, treat, co-manage, and manage the treatment of patients with low back pain disorders.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to provide an update of a previously published evidence-based practice guideline on chiropractic management of low back pain. METHODS: This project updated and combined 3 previous guidelines. A systematic review of articles published between October 2009 through February 2014 was conducted to update the literature published since the previous Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP) guideline was developed. Articles with new relevant information were summarized and provided to the Delphi panel as background information along with the previous CCGPP guidelines. Delphi panelists who served on previous consensus projects and represented a broad sampling of jurisdictions and practice experience related to low back pain management were invited to participate. Thirty-seven panelists participated; 33 were doctors of chiropractic (DCs). In addition, public comment was sought by posting the consensus statements on the CCGPP Web site. The RAND-UCLA methodology was used to reach formal consensus. RESULTS: Consensus was reached after 1 round of revisions, with an additional round conducted to reach consensus on the changes that resulted from the public comment period. Most recommendations made in the original guidelines were unchanged after going through the consensus process. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports that doctors of chiropractic are well suited to diagnose, treat, co-manage, and manage the treatment of patients with low back pain disorders.
Authors: Cathy D Sherbourne; Gery W Ryan; Margaret D Whitley; Carlos I Gutierrez; Ron D Hays; Patricia M Herman; Ian D Coulter Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2019-11-23 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Robert D Vining; Zacariah K Shannon; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance Corber; Amy L Minkalis; Christine M Goertz Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 1.437