Literature DB >> 26804486

Cancer patients' referral wish: effects of distress, problems, socio-demographic and illness-related variables and social support sufficiency.

J M Admiraal1, F M van Nuenen2,3, J G M Burgerhof4, A K L Reyners1, J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study's aim was to examine effects of cancer patients' perceived distress and problems, socio-demographic and illness-related variables and social support sufficiency on referral wish.
METHODS: A cross-sectional group of 1340 patients (response = 51%) completed a questionnaire consisting of the Dutch version of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List, including the referral wish question, and questions on socio-demographic and illness-related variables and perceived social support sufficiency. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of these variables on patients' referral wish.
RESULTS: Of the patients who completed the referral wish question (N = 1297), 13% wished and 21% considered a referral, while 66% did not want a referral. Univariate analyses showed that, in comparison with patients not having a referral wish, those having a (maybe) wish were more distressed, reporting more problems in all Problem List domains, younger, more likely not to have children or children living at home, higher educated, more likely to be employed, under active treatment or recently diagnosed, receiving more intensive treatment and more likely to perceive support received to be insufficient. A final ordinal logistic regression analysis showed independent effects of distress, practical and emotional problems, age and treatment phase on referral wish (χ2 (6) = 205.9; p < 0.001; Nagelkerke's R2  = 0.24).
CONCLUSIONS: A third of the patients (maybe) wished a referral. Knowledge of risk variables (particularly increased distress, experience of more practical and emotional problems, younger age and receiving active treatment or recently diagnosed) may support the identification of patients at increased need of additional healthcare services.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26804486     DOI: 10.1002/pon.4067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  10 in total

1.  An explorative study on systematic assessment of QOL and care needs with the CARES-SF in the early follow-up of patients with digestive cancer.

Authors:  Bojoura Schouten; Dominiek De Jonckheere; Marc Aerts; Jochen Decaestecker; Daan Walgraeve; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Johan Hellings
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Predictors of enduring clinical distress in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Anna K L Reyners; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Cancer patients' wish for psychological support during outpatient radiation therapy : Findings from a psychooncological monitoring program in clinical routine.

Authors:  D Riedl; R Gastl; E Gamper; C R Arnold; D Dejaco; F Schoellmann; G Rumpold
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer: Diagnostic accuracy compared with two reference standards.

Authors:  Myra E van Linde; Annemarie M J Braamse; Emma H Collette; Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; Frank J Snoek; Henk M W Verheul; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  T Tondorf; A Grossert; S I Rothschild; M T Koller; C Rochlitz; A Kiss; R Schaefert; G Meinlschmidt; S Hunziker; D Zwahlen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Following patient pathways to psycho-oncological treatment: Identification of treatment needs by clinical staff and electronic screening.

Authors:  Fanny L Loth; Verena Meraner; Bernhard Holzner; Susanne Singer; Irene Virgolini; Eva M Gamper
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Is type of depressive symptoms associated with patient-perceived need for professional psychological care in depressed individuals with diabetes?

Authors:  L J van der Donk; J Fleer; R Sanderman; P M G Emmelkamp; T P Links; K A Tovote; M J Schroevers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reasons for low uptake of a psychological intervention offered to cancer survivors with elevated depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Loek J van der Donk; K Annika Tovote; Thera P Links; Jan L N Roodenburg; Johanna C Kluin-Nelemans; Henriette J G Arts; Veronique E M Mul; Robert J van Ginkel; Peter C Baas; Christiaan Hoff; Robbert Sanderman; Joke Fleer; Maya J Schroevers
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Are cancer patients with high depressive symptom levels able to manage these symptoms without professional care? The role of coping and social support.

Authors:  Esmée A Bickel; Joke Fleer; Adelita V Ranchor; Maya J Schroevers
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.955

10.  Doctor's recommendations for psychosocial care: Frequency and predictors of recommendations and referrals.

Authors:  Jochen Ernst; Hermann Faller; Uwe Koch; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Holger Schulz; Joachim Weis; Norbert Köhler; Andreas Hinz; Anja Mehnert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.