J M Admiraal1, F M van Nuenen2,3, J G M Burgerhof4, A K L Reyners1, J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers5,6. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Wenckebach Institute, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 5. Wenckebach Institute, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.hoekstra-weebers@umcg.nl. 6. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.hoekstra-weebers@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study's aim was to examine effects of cancer patients' perceived distress and problems, socio-demographic and illness-related variables and social support sufficiency on referral wish. METHODS: A cross-sectional group of 1340 patients (response = 51%) completed a questionnaire consisting of the Dutch version of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List, including the referral wish question, and questions on socio-demographic and illness-related variables and perceived social support sufficiency. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of these variables on patients' referral wish. RESULTS: Of the patients who completed the referral wish question (N = 1297), 13% wished and 21% considered a referral, while 66% did not want a referral. Univariate analyses showed that, in comparison with patients not having a referral wish, those having a (maybe) wish were more distressed, reporting more problems in all Problem List domains, younger, more likely not to have children or children living at home, higher educated, more likely to be employed, under active treatment or recently diagnosed, receiving more intensive treatment and more likely to perceive support received to be insufficient. A final ordinal logistic regression analysis showed independent effects of distress, practical and emotional problems, age and treatment phase on referral wish (χ2 (6) = 205.9; p < 0.001; Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: A third of the patients (maybe) wished a referral. Knowledge of risk variables (particularly increased distress, experience of more practical and emotional problems, younger age and receiving active treatment or recently diagnosed) may support the identification of patients at increased need of additional healthcare services.
BACKGROUND: The present study's aim was to examine effects of cancerpatients' perceived distress and problems, socio-demographic and illness-related variables and social support sufficiency on referral wish. METHODS: A cross-sectional group of 1340 patients (response = 51%) completed a questionnaire consisting of the Dutch version of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List, including the referral wish question, and questions on socio-demographic and illness-related variables and perceived social support sufficiency. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of these variables on patients' referral wish. RESULTS: Of the patients who completed the referral wish question (N = 1297), 13% wished and 21% considered a referral, while 66% did not want a referral. Univariate analyses showed that, in comparison with patients not having a referral wish, those having a (maybe) wish were more distressed, reporting more problems in all Problem List domains, younger, more likely not to have children or children living at home, higher educated, more likely to be employed, under active treatment or recently diagnosed, receiving more intensive treatment and more likely to perceive support received to be insufficient. A final ordinal logistic regression analysis showed independent effects of distress, practical and emotional problems, age and treatment phase on referral wish (χ2 (6) = 205.9; p < 0.001; Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: A third of the patients (maybe) wished a referral. Knowledge of risk variables (particularly increased distress, experience of more practical and emotional problems, younger age and receiving active treatment or recently diagnosed) may support the identification of patients at increased need of additional healthcare services.
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Dominiek De Jonckheere; Marc Aerts; Jochen Decaestecker; Daan Walgraeve; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Johan Hellings Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Anna K L Reyners; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A G Sprangers Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Myra E van Linde; Annemarie M J Braamse; Emma H Collette; Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; Frank J Snoek; Henk M W Verheul; Joost Dekker Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: T Tondorf; A Grossert; S I Rothschild; M T Koller; C Rochlitz; A Kiss; R Schaefert; G Meinlschmidt; S Hunziker; D Zwahlen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: L J van der Donk; J Fleer; R Sanderman; P M G Emmelkamp; T P Links; K A Tovote; M J Schroevers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Loek J van der Donk; K Annika Tovote; Thera P Links; Jan L N Roodenburg; Johanna C Kluin-Nelemans; Henriette J G Arts; Veronique E M Mul; Robert J van Ginkel; Peter C Baas; Christiaan Hoff; Robbert Sanderman; Joke Fleer; Maya J Schroevers Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jochen Ernst; Hermann Faller; Uwe Koch; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Holger Schulz; Joachim Weis; Norbert Köhler; Andreas Hinz; Anja Mehnert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.240