D R Thomson1, M J Baldwin2, M I Bellini2, M A Silva2. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK. Electronic address: davidthomson134@gmail.com. 2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Operative notes are the recognized standard for documenting the details of an operation yet key procedural details are frequently missing. With the aim of improving standards, based on the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) and Dutch Society of Surgery (DSS) Guidelines, we introduced an operation note proforma for use following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary centre in the UK. METHODS: This study audited 130 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation notes against accepted guidelines across three hospital sites within the same NHS Trust. Following analysis of these operation notes a standardized operation note proforma was designed and introduced across the Trust, which included all items from the DSS and RCS guidelines in the form of keyword prompts or simple yes/no responses. A further 128 operation notes were analysed. Guideline compliance was compared pre- and post-introduction of the proforma. Non-parametric data were analysed using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: On a global assessment of operation note completeness against all guideline items, introduction of an operation note proforma significantly improved documentation rates for both DSS guidelines (p < 0.001) and RCS guidelines (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that the introduction of a procedure-specific proforma to assist with writing the post-operative note following laparoscopic cholecystectomy can result in significant improvements in documentation of generic and procedure-specific items that should be recorded for every operation. Procedure-specific proformas, based on established guidelines can help to produce more complete and medico-legally robust operation notes.
INTRODUCTION: Operative notes are the recognized standard for documenting the details of an operation yet key procedural details are frequently missing. With the aim of improving standards, based on the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) and Dutch Society of Surgery (DSS) Guidelines, we introduced an operation note proforma for use following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary centre in the UK. METHODS: This study audited 130 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation notes against accepted guidelines across three hospital sites within the same NHS Trust. Following analysis of these operation notes a standardized operation note proforma was designed and introduced across the Trust, which included all items from the DSS and RCS guidelines in the form of keyword prompts or simple yes/no responses. A further 128 operation notes were analysed. Guideline compliance was compared pre- and post-introduction of the proforma. Non-parametric data were analysed using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: On a global assessment of operation note completeness against all guideline items, introduction of an operation note proforma significantly improved documentation rates for both DSS guidelines (p < 0.001) and RCS guidelines (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that the introduction of a procedure-specific proforma to assist with writing the post-operative note following laparoscopic cholecystectomy can result in significant improvements in documentation of generic and procedure-specific items that should be recorded for every operation. Procedure-specific proformas, based on established guidelines can help to produce more complete and medico-legally robust operation notes.
Authors: Shannon E Stogryn; Krista Hardy; Michael J Mullan; Jason Park; Christopher Andrew; Ashley Vergis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Benjamin T Miller; Aldo Fafaj; Luciano Tastaldi; Hemasat Alkhatib; Samuel Zolin; Raha AlMarzooqi; Chao Tu; Diya Alaedeen; Ajita S Prabhu; David M Krpata; Michael J Rosen; Clayton C Petro Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Niall O'Connor; Michael Sugrue; Conor Melly; Gearoid McGeehan; Magda Bucholc; Aileen Crawford; Paul O'Connor; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Imtiaz Wani; Zsolt J Balogh; Vishal G Shelat; Giovanni D Tebala; Belinda De Simone; Hani O Eid; Mircea Chirica; Gustavo P Fraga; Salomone Di Saverio; Edoardo Picetti; Luigi Bonavina; Marco Ceresoli; Andreas Fette; Boris Sakakushe; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Raul Coimbra; Richard Ten Broek; Andreas Hecker; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; Philip Stahel; Edward Tan; Kaoru Koike; Fausto Catena; Michele Pisano; Federico Coccolini; Alison Johnston Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.469