Literature DB >> 26803726

Stratification of predictive factors to assess resectability and surgical outcome in clinoidal meningioma.

Anil Nanda1, Subhas K Konar2, Tanmoy K Maiti2, Shyamal C Bir2, Bharat Guthikonda2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Meningiomas of the clinoidal region pose significant surgical challenges due to their close proximity and intimate relation with surrounding critical neurovascular structures. Our aim was to describe our institution's experience with the management of clinoidal meningiomas, identify predictive factors and develop a comprehensive grading system to assess the extent of resection.
METHODS: The medical records of 36 consecutive patients underwent surgery from 1995 to 2015 with clinoidal meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed. Using selected clinical features and tumor characteristics, a grading scale was devised and utilized to assess a degree of tumor resectability. The factors included: preoperative visual status(no visual loss=0, visual loss=1), tumor volume: small (<13.5 cm(3)=1), moderate (13.5-30 cm(3)=2), and large (>30 cm(3)=3),relationship with the internal carotid artery (no displacement=0, displacement=1, encasement=2, stenosis=3 and bilateral involvement=4) tumor extension into the cavernous sinus (yes=1, no=0) and invasion into the optic canal (yes=1, no=0), (defined as tumor beyond the falciform ligament). A grading system was designed using the total scores (10) in this classification and separating patients into two groups: group 1 with scores of 5 or less, group 2 with scores more than 5.
RESULTS: The patients mean age at the time of intervention was 61 years. The tumor involved the cavernous sinus in 38.9% of patients and invaded the optic canal in 36% of cases. The patient presented with visual impairment in 89% of cases. Vision improved in 28% and remained stable in 63% of cases. The mean volume of a tumor was 16.99 cm(3). The most common approach involved pterional with or without anterior clinoidectomy. After stratification, group 1 consisting of 22 patients and in group 2, 14 patients. Gross total resection (Simpson Grade I or II) was achieved in 75% of surgeries and subtotal and partial resections were achieved in 25% of cases. Group 1 patients had higher gross total resection rate than group 2 (p=0.009). Only optic canal involvement was significantly associated with the extent of resectabilty in a univariate analysis (p=0.03). Four patients developed tumor recurrence with median recurrence duration of 89 months (53-204 months). Three patients underwent GKRS and one patient underwent repeat surgery at the time of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: A grading system can be employed in patients who present with clinoidal meningiomas and serve as an aid in planning an appropriate treatment strategy and establishing the prognosis. Radical resection can be planned in patients with favorable tumor criteria (groups 1) while a less aggressive surgical approach followed by stereotactic radiosurgery may be better suited for patients with less favorable tumor characteristics (group 2). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinoidal meningioma; Extent of resection; Outcomes; Recurrence; Score

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26803726     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  7 in total

1.  Inter-observer variability of manual contour delineation of structures in CT.

Authors:  Leo Joskowicz; D Cohen; N Caplan; J Sosna
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Meningioma recurrence rates following treatment: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Victor Lam Shin Cheung; Albert Kim; Arjun Sahgal; Sunit Das
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Long-term follow-up after surgical removal of meningioma of the inner third of the sphenoidal wing: outcome determinants and different strategies.

Authors:  Andrea Talacchi; Aurel Hasanbelliu; Alberto D'Amico; Nicolò Regge Gianas; Francesca Locatelli; Alberto Pasqualin; Michele Longhi; Antonio Nicolato
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Predictive factors for surgical outcome in anterior clinoidal meningiomas: Analysis of 59 consecutive surgically treated cases.

Authors:  Ju-Hwi Kim; Woo-Youl Jang; Tae-Young Jung; In-Young Kim; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Woo Dae Kang; Seul-Kee Kim; Kyung-Sub Moon; Shin Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  D Starnoni; C Tuleasca; L Giammattei; G Cossu; M Bruneau; M Berhouma; J F Cornelius; L Cavallo; S Froelich; E Jouanneau; T R Meling; D Paraskevopoulos; H Schroeder; M Tatagiba; I Zazpe; A Sufianov; M E Sughrue; Ari G Chacko; V Benes; P González-Lopez; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy T Daniel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Anterior Clinoid Metastasis Removed Extradurally: First Case Report.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Blazej Zbytek; Kenan I Arnautović
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2018-05-31

7.  Anterior Clinoidal Meningiomas: Meningeal Anatomical Considerations and Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Tao Xu; Yong Yan; Alexander I Evins; Zhenyu Gong; Lei Jiang; Huaiyu Sun; Li Cai; Hongxiang Wang; Weiqing Li; Yicheng Lu; Ming Zhang; Juxiang Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.