Literature DB >> 26803338

An integrative modeling approach for the efficient estimation of cross sectional tibial stresses during locomotion.

Timothy R Derrick1, W Brent Edwards2, Rebecca E Fellin3, Joseph F Seay3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to utilize a series of models to estimate the stress in a cross section of the tibia, located 62% from the proximal end, during walking. Twenty-eight male, active duty soldiers walked on an instrumented treadmill while external force data and kinematics were recorded. A rigid body model was used to estimate joint moments and reaction forces. A musculoskeletal model was used to gather muscle length, muscle velocity, moment arm and orientation information. Optimization procedures were used to estimate muscle forces and finally internal bone forces and moments were applied to an inhomogeneous, subject specific bone model obtained from CT scans to estimate stress in the bone cross section. Validity was assessed by comparison to stresses calculated from strain gage data in the literature and sensitivity was investigated using two simplified versions of the bone model-a homogeneous model and an ellipse approximation. Peak compressive stress occurred on the posterior aspect of the cross section (-47.5 ± 14.9 MPa). Peak tensile stress occurred on the anterior aspect (27.0 ± 11.7 MPa) while the location of peak shear was variable between subjects (7.2 ± 2.4 MPa). Peak compressive, tensile and shear stresses were within 0.52 MPa, 0.36 MPa and 3.02 MPa respectively of those calculated from the converted strain gage data. Peak values from a inhomogeneous model of the bone correlated well with homogeneous model (normal: 0.99; shear: 0.94) as did the normal ellipse model (r=0.89-0.96). However, the relationship between shear stress in the inhomogeneous model and ellipse model was less accurate (r=0.64). The procedures detailed in this paper provide a non-invasive and relatively quick method of estimating cross sectional stress that holds promise for assessing injury and osteogenic stimulus in bone during normal physical activity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beam theory; Bone models; Finite element method; Internal bone moments; Strain gage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26803338     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Mechanical Fatigue of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Ground Reaction Force Waveforms in Running.

Authors:  Lindsay L Loundagin; Tannin A Schmidt; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Biomechanical Basis of Predicting and Preventing Lower Limb Stress Fractures During Arduous Training.

Authors:  Thomas J O'Leary; Hannah M Rice; Julie P Greeves
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Body size and lower limb posture during walking in humans.

Authors:  Martin Hora; Libor Soumar; Herman Pontzer; Vladimír Sládek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.

Authors:  Emily S Matijevich; Lauren M Branscombe; Leon R Scott; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development of a Knee Joint CT-FEM Model in Load Response of the Stance Phase During Walking Using Muscle Exertion, Motion Analysis, and Ground Reaction Force Data.

Authors:  Kunihiro Watanabe; Hirotaka Mutsuzaki; Takashi Fukaya; Toshiyuki Aoyama; Syuichi Nakajima; Norio Sekine; Koichi Mori
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Measuring femoral neck loads in healthy young and older adults during stair ascent and descent.

Authors:  Chen Deng; Jason C Gillette; Timothy R Derrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Shock Response Spectrum Analysis of Fatigued Runners.

Authors:  Daniel Benjamin; Serge Odof; Boussad Abbès; François Fourchet; Benoit Christiaen; Redha Taïar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.